The role of L1 conceptual and linguistic knowledge and frequency in the acquisition of L2 metaphorical expressions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11655819 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ebru Türker (0000-0001-5433-7184, Arizona State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 25-48 |
| Publication date | 2015-07-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Second language Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0267-6583 • E-ISSN: 1477-0326 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0267658315593336 |
| OpenAlex | W2272798350 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
| References cited | 70 |
This study investigates how figurative language is processed by learners of a second language (L2). With an experiment testing L2 comprehension of figurative expressions in three categories, each combining shared and unshared first language (L1) and L2 lexical representations and conceptual representations in a different way, the study investigates the effects of L1 conceptual knowledge, L1 linguistic knowledge and L1 frequency. I predict that in cases where the L1 and L2 share similarities in terms of conceptual knowledge (e.g. ANGER IS FIRE) and metaphorical expressions (e.g. His eyes are burning with anger), learners will better comprehend the L2 figurative expressions than in cases where the L1 and L2 share no such similarities. I further predict that when L1 and L2 share similarities in both conceptual knowledge and metaphorical expression, L1 frequency will have a positive effect on L2 metaphorical comprehension. These hypotheses are tested by examining the comprehension of advanced-level L2 Korean learners whose native language is English. The testing items are 54 Korean metaphorical expressions related to three emotion concepts (ANGER, HAPPINESS and SADNESS) presented to participants in one decontextualized and two contextualized tasks (limited and elaborated). The results demonstrate that the effects of L1 conceptual/linguistic knowledge and L1 frequency vary depending on the given context. The L2 learners performed significantly better with figurative language for which L1 and L2 show similarities at both lexical and conceptual levels, but only in the conditions of no or limited context. In the same conditions, the study also found a significant effect of L1 frequency on L2 processing of figurative language. This study suggests that the L1 has considerable influence on how L2 metaphorical expressions are processed in a nonsupportive context, even at higher levels of proficiency
Anger · Cognitive psychology · Comprehension · Context (archaeology · Language proficiency · Linguistics · Literal and figurative language · Mathematics education · Sadness · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · linguistics and terminology studies · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Social Psychology
Developing EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Repertoire Through Semantic Relations Techniques
Green and black
Conventionality and context jointly modulate the effect of inhibitory control on L2 metaphor comprehension
Conceptual metaphor activation in Chinese–English bilinguals
Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing
The effect of executive control ability on the comprehension of second language metaphor
Conceptual metaphors, plurilingualism and second language acquisition
Anadilinde ve İkinci Dilde Metaforik Dilin İşlemlenmesi
Concept-Based Language Instruction Effects for Second and Heritage Language Learners
Metaphor Comprehension of Chinese Learners of English
The potential trade-off between L3 Chinese proficiency and L1 Thai verbal fluency
Gender and proficiency effects on metaphor use among Greek learners
The role of reticence in the comprehension of metaphorical taboo expressions in the foreign language
The influence of cross-language similarity and transparency on idiom knowledge in non-immersed L2 speakers
Crossing the cultural bridge
Synergic Concepts, Lexical Idiosyncrasies, and Lexical Complexities in Bilingual Students' Translated Texts as Efforts to Resolve Conceptual Inequivalences
Unconventional Metaphor Use in the Writing of Chinese Learners of English
Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition
On Our MindSalience, Context, and Figurative Language
Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure
Formulaic Language and the Lexicon
Exemplar dynamics
The Processing of Formulaic Sequences by Second Language Speakers
The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors
Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms
Constructions, Chunking, and Connectionism
Frequency of Input and L2 Collocational Processing
How to kick the bucket and not decompose
Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming
The comprehension of idioms
Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition
Formulaic Sequences
Second Language Figurative Proficiency
Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention
Idioms
Lexical representation and development in a second language
Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax
First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition
Understanding figurative and literal language
Literal vs. figurative language
Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure
On my mind
English idioms in the first language and second language lexicon
Adding more fuel to the fire
Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners
Use and acquisition of idiomatic expressions in referring by native and non‐native speakers
Don't Put Your Leg in Your Mouth
L1 Influence on the Acquisition of L2 Collocations
Conceptual Clusters in Figurative Language Production
Memory for metaphor by nonfluent bilinguals
Crosslinguistic Influence
More than words
Crosslinguistic Influence and Conceptual Transfer
Frequency Effects in Language Processing
Dueling contexts
On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions
Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience
A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances
On the priority of salient meanings
| Unique citing works | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,13 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 17 |