Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Angry losers? The (null) effects of feeling electoral loss on anti-democratic attitudes

Bibliographic Data

ID11891747
AuthorsKatharina Lawall (0000-0002-6045-0105, University of Reading, corresponding author), Katerina Michalaki (Aston University), Manos Tsakiris (0000-0001-7753-7576, University of London)
Year2026
Volume65
Issue3
Pages1-16
Publication date2026-02-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Political Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0304-4130 • E-ISSN: 1475-6765
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1017/s1475676525100601
OpenAlexW7130507437
LanguageEN
References cited57

Peaceful transfers of power are a fundamental principle of democracy. Yet, in times of heightened affective polarisation, election losses may trigger strong negative emotional reactions in partisans, which in turn undermine support for fundamental democratic principles among partisans. We test this idea through two pre-registered survey experiments conducted after the 2022 and 2024 elections in the United States. We randomly assign partisans to receive either a placebo or an emotive reminder about the election that their party lost, containing others’ angry or worried reactions at the election outcome. Contrary to our pre-registered expectations, we do not find evidence that priming negative feelings about electoral loss affects support for political violence or democratic norms. Emotive reminders about salient political events can momentarily turn up the heat on politics, but are not enough to propel partisans to adopt extreme anti-democratic attitudes. By linking the study of emotions to democratic norms, this article contributes to our understanding of when negative emotions (fail to) radicalise partisans

Anger · Democracy · Emotive · Feeling · Politics · Power (physics · Priming (agriculture · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology

  • American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective

    Open Access•Noam Gidron, James Adams et al.•American Affective Polarization…•2020

  • American Rage

    Open Access•Steven W Webster•American Rage•2020

  • Current research overstates American support for political violence

    Open Access•Sean Westwood, Justin Grimmer et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2022

  • Digital Emotion Contagion

    Open Access•Amit Goldenberg, James J Gro et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2020

  • Confrontational and Preventative Policy Responses to Terrorism

    Linda J Skitka, Linda Skitka et al.•Basic and Applied Social Psychology•2006

  • The promise and pitfalls of cross-partisan conversations for reducing affective polarization

    Open Access•Erik Santoro, David E Broockman•Science Advances•2022

  • Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments

    Open Access•Stefan Palan, Christian Schitter•Journal of Behavioral and…•2018

  • Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks

    Open Access•Adam D I Kramer, Adam Kramer et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2014

  • Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism

    Open Access•Jennifer S Lerner, Roxana M Gonzalez et al.•Psychological Science•2003

  • Radical American Partisanship

    Nathan P Kalmoe, L Mason•Radical American Partisanship•2022

  • Losers' Consent

    Christopher Anderson, Christopher J Anderson et al.•Losers' consent•2005

  • Comparing implications of distinct emotion, network, and dimensional approaches for co-occurring emotions

    Jacob Lange, Janis H Zickfeld•Emotion•2023

  • Mixed emotions

    Julia Moeller, Zorana Ivcevic et al.•Emotion•2018

  • Priming Partisan Identities and Support for Political Violence

    Open Access•Suhan Kacholia, Fabian G Neuner•Frontiers in Political Science•2022

  • Losing Hurts

    Open Access•Lois Pierce, Todd Rogers et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2015

  • The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections

    Open Access•Nicolas Berlinski, Margaret Doyle et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2021

  • How Emotional Traits and Practices Lead to Support in Acts of Political Violence

    Natalie Anastasio, Arie Perliger et al.•Studies in Conflict and Terrorism•2021

  • The role of threat, emotions, and prejudice in promoting collective action against immigrant groups

    Open Access•Laura Shepherd, Fabio Fasoli et al.•European Journal of Social…•2018

  • Dealing in hope

    Open Access•Smadar Cohen‐chen, Smadar Cohen-Chen et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2019

  • Beyond the Turk

    Open Access•Eyal Peer, Laura Brandimarte et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2017

  • Expressive Versus Instrumental Partisanship in Multiparty European Systems

    Open Access•Leonie Huddy, Alexa Bankert et al.•Political Psychology•2018

  • Do European elections enhance satisfaction with European Union democracy

    Open Access•Carolina Plescia, Jean-François Daoust et al.•European Union Politics•2021

  • Fear and loathing across party lines’ (also) in Europe

    Open Access•Andres Reiljan•European Journal of Political…•2020

  • The Effect of Partisan Representation at Different Levels of Government on Satisfaction with Democracy in the United States

    Open Access•Julie Vandusky-Allen, Julie A Vandusky-Allen et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2021

  • How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms

    Open Access•Jon Kingzette, James N Druckman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • Affective Polarization in Comparative and Longitudinal Perspective

    Open Access•Diego Garzia, Frederico Ferreira Da Silva et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2023

  • Are People More Satisfied with Democracy When They Feel They Won the Election? No

    Open Access•Jean-François Daoust, Carolina Plescia et al.•Political Studies Review•2023

  • Does the Election Winner–Loser Gap Extend to Subjective Health and Well-Being

    Open Access•Dimiter Toshkov, Honorata Mazepus•Political Studies Review•2023

  • Winning, Losing and Satisfaction with Democracy

    Open Access•André Blais, François Gélineau•Political Studies•2007

  • Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning via the Internet

    Open Access•Nicholas A Valentino, Vincent L Hutchings et al.•Political Psychology•2008

  • How Emotional Frames Moralize and Polarize Political Attitudes

    Open Access•Clifford, Scott Clifford•Political Psychology•2019

  • Fear, Anger, and Voting for the Far Right

    Open Access•Pavlos Vasilopoulos, George E Marcus et al.•Political Psychology•2019

  • Do Partisans Make Different Investment Decisions When Their Party is in Power

    Open Access•Masha Krupenkin, Shawndra Hill et al.•Political Behavior•2024

  • Enemy Mine

    Open Access•Hannah M Ridge•Political Behavior•2022

  • Fear and Anger in Great Britain

    Open Access•Markus Wagner•Political Behavior•2014

  • Measuring Partisanship as a Social Identity in Multi-Party Systems

    Open Access•Alexa Bankert, Leonie Huddy et al.•Political Behavior•2017

  • Party Animals? Extreme Partisan Polarization and Dehumanization

    Open Access•James L Martherus, James Martherus et al.•Political Behavior•2021

  • Who Supports Political Violence

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, A M Enders•Perspectives on Politics•2024

  • Party system institutionalization, partisan affect, and satisfaction with democracy

    Open Access•Hannah M Ridge•Party Politics•2023

  • The effect of accumulated losses on perceptions of legitimacy

    Open Access•Anna Kern, Sofie Marien et al.•European Political Science Review•2024

  • The relationship between affective polarization and democratic backsliding

    Yunus Emre Orhan•Democratization•2022

  • Civic Engagements

    Open Access•Michael Mackuen, Jennifer Wolak et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • When Can Politicians Scare Citizens Into Supporting Bad Policies

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia, Jesse O Menning•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Satisfaction with Democracy and the Winner/Loser Debate

    Open Access•Luigi Curini, Willy Jou et al.•British Journal of Political…•2012

  • Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is! Explaining Collective Action Tendencies Through Group-Based Anger and Group Efficacy

    Martijn Van Zomeren, Russell Spears et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2004

  • The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States

    Sharad Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • The Emotional Underpinnings of Populism

    Open Access•Guillem Rico, Marc Guinjoan et al.•Swiss Political Science Review•2017

  • Affective polarization in multiparty systems

    Open Access•Markus Wagner•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy

    Open Access•Jennifer Mccoy, Tahmina Rahman et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2018

  • Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes

    Open Access•Jan Gerrit Voelkel, James Chu et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2022

  • Electoral outcomes and satisfaction with democracy

    Open Access•Jean-François Daoust, Hannah M Ridge et al.•Electoral Studies•2023

  • Expressive Partisanship

    Open Access•Leonie Huddy, L Mason et al.•American Political Science Review•2015

  • President Trump Stress Disorder

    Open Access•Masha Krupenkin, David Rothschild et al.•SAGE Open•2019

  • Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States

    Open Access•Matthew H Graham, Milan W Svolik•American Political Science Review•2020

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae