Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Women’s Humility and Men’s Lack of Hubris

Gender Biases in Self-Estimated Spatial Intelligence

Bibliographic Data

ID11997890
AuthorsGabriela Hofer (0000-0003-4407-1487, Graz University of Technology, corresponding author), Marla Hünninghaus (Graz University of Technology), Jana Platzer (Graz University of Technology), Sandra Grinschgl (0000-0001-6666-9426, University of Bern), Aljoscha C Neubauer (0000-0002-1326-3104, Graz University of Technology)
Year2025
Volume91
Issue4
Publication date2025-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSex Roles (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0360-0025 • E-ISSN: 1573-2762
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s11199-025-01572-8
OpenAlexW4409361260
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited90

Women tend to view themselves as less capable than men. Some have interpreted this as female underestimation and male overestimation, a phenomenon called hubris-humility effect. While such an effect could have important practical implications (e.g., on career choices), only few studies compared women's and men's self-estimates to their measured abilities. We investigated the hubris-humility effect in spatial intelligence, a domain in which many studies reported women’s and men’s abilities to differ substantially. Participants ( n = 208; 103 women and 105 men; aged 18–37) completed self-estimate and performance measures of spatial intelligence and additional questionnaires on personality and interests. Surprisingly, women and men performed similarly well in the spatial tests. Still, women, on average, provided more negative self-estimates of their overall spatial intelligence and concrete test performance than men. This constituted female humility but not male hubris: Women underestimated themselves, but men did not overestimate themselves. To contextualize the effect, we tested associations between misestimation and specific personality traits (narcissism and honesty-humility). Especially people higher in grandiose narcissism provided overly positive self-estimates. However, even when we accounted for individual differences in grandiose narcissism, women still underestimated themselves more than men. We further investigated interests in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers. Women reported lower STEM interests than men—interests that, in turn, showed stronger associations to self-estimated than measured spatial intelligence. Our findings suggest that improving women’s self-views in the spatial domain might contribute towards greater gender equality in STEM

Developmental psychology · Egocentrism · Hubris · Humility · Theology · Geography Education and Pedagogy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Spatial Cognition and Navigation

  • Gender stereotypes and the construction of self-beliefs in spatial cognition

    Open Access•Linda Arrighi, Markus Hausmann•Psychological Research•2026

  • How people estimate the prevalence of aphantasia and hyperphantasia in the population

    Open Access•Olesya Blazhenkova, Alexey Kotov et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2025

  • Cognitive Sex/Gender Differences and the Beliefs in Own Spatial Abilities

    Open Access•Linda Arrighi, Anna A Matejko et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2026

  • Human Cognitive Abilities

    Open Access•John B Carroll•Human Cognitive Abilities•1993

  • Spatial Thinking and STEM Education

    Open Access•David H Uttal, Cheryl A Cohen•The Psychology of learning and…•2012

  • Spatial ability for STEM domains

    Jonathan Wai, David Lubinski et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2009

  • Thinking Clearly About Correlations and Causation

    Open Access•Julia M Rohrer•Advances in Methods and Practices…•2018

  • Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)

    Open Access•Ming-Te Wang, Jessica L Degol•Educational Psychology Review•2017

  • A 21 Word Solution

    Open Access•Joseph P Simmons, Leif D Nelson et al.•SSRN Electronic Journal•2012

  • Do People Have Insight Into Their Abilities? A Metasynthesis

    Open Access•Ethan Zell, Zlatan Krizan•Perspectives on Psychological…•2014

  • I Like to Do It, I'm Able, and I Know I Am

    Open Access•Jaap J A Denissen, Nicole Zarrett et al.•Child Development•2007

  • The Narcissism Spectrum Model

    Open Access•Zlatan Krizan, Anne D Herlache•Personality and Social Psychology…•2018

  • Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis.

    Ethan Zell, Zlatan Krizan et al.•American Psychologist•2015

  • The Hexaco-60

    Michael C Ashton, Michael Ashton et al.•Journal of Personality Assessment•2009

  • The Gender Gap in STEM Fields

    Open Access•Elena Makarova, Belinda Aeschlimann et al.•Frontiers in Education•2019

  • A theory of vocational choice.

    John L Holland•Journal of Counseling Psychology•1959

  • The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on the Self-Concept of Female Students in STEM Subjects with an Under-Representation of Females

    Open Access•Bernhard Ertl, Silke Luttenberger et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2017

  • The gender similarities hypothesis.

    Janet Shibley Hyde•American Psychologist•2005

  • Sex/Gender Differences in Verbal Fluency and Verbal-Episodic Memory

    Open Access•Marco Hirnstein, Josephine Stuebs et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2023

  • Influence of the stimulus material on gender differences in a mental-rotation test

    Open Access•Martina Rahe, Vera Ruthsatz et al.•Psychological Research•2021

  • Note on a Confidence Interval for the Squared Semipartial Correlation Coefficient

    Open Access•James Algina, Harvey J Keselman et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2008

  • The truth and bias model of judgment

    Tessa V West, D A Kenny•Psychological Review•2011

  • The Problem of Units and the Circumstance for Pomp

    Patricia Cohen, Jacob Cohen et al.•Multivariate Behavioral Research•1999

  • Sex differences in Hexaco personality characteristics across countries and ethnicities

    Open Access•Kibeom Lee, Michael C Ashton•Journal of Personality•2020

  • Riasec interests and the Big Five personality traits matter for life success—But do they already matter for educational track choices

    Open Access•Nele Usslepp, Nicolas Hübner et al.•Journal of Personality•2020

  • What do highly narcissistic people think and feel about (their) intelligence

    Open Access•Marcin Zajenkowski, Anna Z Czarna et al.•Journal of Personality•2020

  • What is gender, anyway

    Open Access•Anna Lindqvist, Marie Gustafsson Sendén et al.•Psychology and Sexuality•2021

  • The development of gender differences in spatial reasoning

    Jillian E Lauer, Eukyung Yhang et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2019

  • Gender differences in narcissism

    Emily Grijalva, Daniel A Newman et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2015

  • Parents’ Beliefs about High School Students’ Spatial Abilities

    Open Access•Katherine Muenks, Emily Grossnickle Peterson et al.•Sex Roles•2019

  • What Explains Boys’ Stronger Confidence in their Intelligence

    Open Access•Ricarda Steinmayr, Birgit Spinath•Sex Roles•2009

  • Spatial Skills and Self-Perceived Masculinity

    Open Access•Donald P Kelly, Adriene M Beltz•Sex Roles•2022

  • Mind the gender gap

    Open Access•Erin Young, Erin S Young et al.•New Technology Work and Employment•2023

  • Assessing Hypersensitive Narcissism

    Open Access•Holly M Hendin, Jonathan M Cheek•Journal of Research in Personality•1997

  • Love is not blind

    Open Access•Gabriela Hofer, Silvia Macher et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•2022

  • The “other” relationships of self-assessed intelligence

    Open Access•M C Howard, Joshua E Cogswell•Journal of Research in Personality•2018

  • The prediction of Honesty–Humility-related criteria by the Hexaco and Five-Factor Models of personality

    Open Access•Michael C Ashton, Kibeom Lee•Journal of Research in Personality•2008

  • Who knows what we are good at? Unique insights of the self, knowledgeable informants, and strangers into a person’s abilities

    Open Access•Gabriela Hofer, Laura Langmann et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•2022

  • The Dark Triad of personality

    Open Access•Delroy L Paulhus, Kevin M Williams•Journal of Research in Personality•2002

  • Is the Dark Triad common factor distinct from low Honesty-Humility

    Open Access•Gordon Hodson, Angela Book et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•2018

  • Narcissistic admiration and rivalry

    Mitja D Back, Albrecht C P Küfner et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2013

  • Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities

    Daniel Voyer, Susan D Voyer et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1995

  • Emergence and Characterization of Sex Differences in Spatial Ability

    Marcia C Linn, Anne C Petersen•Child Development•1985

  • Decomposing self-estimates of intelligence

    Open Access•Sophie Von Stumm, Tomas Chamorro‐premuzic et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2009

  • Men and things, women and people

    Rong Su, James Rounds et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2009

  • Women's underrepresentation in science

    Stephen J Ceci, W M Williams et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2009

  • Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics

    Nicole M Else-Quest, Janet Shibley Hyde et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2010

  • A power primer

    Jacob Cohen•Psychological Bulletin•1992

  • How smart do you think you are? A meta-analysis on the validity of self-estimates of cognitive ability

    Philipp Alexander Freund, Nadine Kasten•Psychological Bulletin•2012

Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae