Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Women Are More Likely Than Men to Use Tentative Language, Aren’t They? A Meta-Analysis Testing for Gender Differences and Moderators

Bibliographic Data

ID12005249
AuthorsCampbell Leaper (0000-0002-8670-8848, Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, corresponding author), Rachael D Robnett (0000-0003-3478-5814, Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA)
Year2011
Volume35
Issue1
Pages129-142
Publication date2011-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychology of Women Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0361-6843 • E-ISSN: 1471-6402
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0361684310392728
OpenAlexW2102636151
LanguageEN
Citations received37
References cited54

Robin Lakoff proposed that women are more likely than men to use tentative speech forms (e.g., hedges, qualifiers/disclaimers, tag questions, intensifiers). Based on conflicting results from research testing Lakoff’s claims, a meta-analysis of studies testing gender differences in tentative language was conducted. The sample included 29 studies with 39 independent samples and a combined total sample of 3,502 participants. Results revealed a statistically significant but small effect size ( d = .23), indicating that women were somewhat more likely than men to use tentative speech. In addition, methodological moderators (operational definition, observation length, recording method, author gender, and year of study) and contextual moderators (gender composition, familiarity, student status, group size, conversational activity, and physical setting) were tested. Effect sizes were significantly larger in studies that (a) observed longer (vs. shorter) conversations, (b) sampled undergraduates (vs. other adults), (c) observed groups (vs. dyads), and (d) occurred in research labs (vs. other settings). The moderator effects are interpreted as supporting proposals that women's greater likelihood of tentative language reflects interpersonal sensitivity rather than a lack of assertiveness. In addition, the influence of self-presentation concerns in the enactment of gender-typed behavior is discussed

Assertiveness · Developmental psychology · Interpersonal communication · Meta-analysis · Moderation · Digital Communication and Language · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Gender Differences in Personality and Social Behavior

    Open Access•Marco Del Giudice•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Gender Similarities and Differences

    Janet Shibley Hyde•Annual Review of Psychology•2014

  • The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences

    Open Access•Jeff Archer•Biological Reviews•2019

  • A Study on Gender Differences in the Incorporation of Pragmatic Strategies of Self-Praise in China's Online Social Media

    Xuyue Liu•East Asian Pragmatics•2026

  • Gender and communication in children and school

    Open Access•Ben Kilby•SN Social Sciences•2023

  • Tentative Language in Mixed-Gender Conversations of Jordanians

    Open Access•Moh’d A Al-Omari, Wael M S Zuraiq et al.•Humanities & Social Sciences…•2020

  • Gender stereotypes and communication styles

    Ayah Alnajjar, Aseel Zibin•Lodz Papers in Pragmatics•2025

  • Female Audit Partners and Extended Audit Reporting

    Open Access•Tarek Abdelfattah, Mohamed Elmahgoub et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2021

  • Alone or together

    Open Access•Øystein O Skaar, Rolf Reber•Scandinavian Journal of Psychology•2023

  • Making Design Moves

    Open Access•Alexandra Powell, Abbey K Mann et al.•The Journal of Creative Behavior•2024

  • El Efecto Matilda en la red de coautorías Hispanoamericana en Comunicación

    Open Access•Francisco Segado-Boj, Juan José Prieto Gutiérrez et al.•Revista Mediterranea de…•2021

  • Examining Graduate Student Engagement in Counseling Services with Diverse Populations in P-12 Education

    Open Access•Shyrea J Minton•International Journal of…•2017

  • Interviews with Experts

    Elizabeth A Moorhouse•Feminist Economics•2026

  • Teaching creative thinking

    R K Sawyer•Mind Culture and Activity•2022

  • “This is perplexing because…”

    Open Access•Qian Wang, G Hu•Language Sciences•2024

  • The Financial Language of Gender

    Open Access•Andrzej Cwynar, Kamil Filipek et al.•SAGE Open•2025

  • When Gender Matters in Scientific Communication

    Open Access•Jasmine M DeJesus, Valerie A Umscheid et al.•Sex Roles•2021

  • Nature of Science Views and Epistemological Views of College Biology Students

    Open Access•Lisa A Borgerding, Hasan Deniz•Canadian Journal of Science…•2019

  • Female Politicians’ Gendered Communicative Structures

    Tsfira Grebelsky-Lichtman, Keren Mabar•Israeli Studies Review•2021

  • Female physicians in senior management positions during a crisis

    Open Access•Tsfira Grebelsky-Lichtman, Michal Gur-Dick•Gender in Management An…•2024

  • Under-represented, cautious, and modest

    Open Access•Julia Bettecken, Ann-Cathrin Klöckner et al.•European Political Science•2022

  • Impoliteness in women’s specialised writing in seventeenth-century English

    Open Access•Francisco J Alonso-Almeida, Francisco J Álvarez-Gil•Journal of Historical Pragmatics•2021

  • Love without borders

    Open Access•Marybeth Mercer, Souha Ezzedeen et al.•International Journal of Cross…•2025

  • Who dominates the conversation? The effect of gender, discussion medium, and controversy on political discussion

    Mary Herring, Jennie Sweet-Cushman et al.•Feminist Media Studies•2020

  • Speakers’ expressions before and in a public presentation. Pleasantness, emotional valence, credibility, and comprehension effects

    Open Access•Emma Rodero, Olatz Larrea et al.•El Profesional de la Informacion•2022

  • Social dominance orientation, nonnative accents, and hiring recommendations

    Karolina Hansen, John F Dovidio•Cultural Diversity & Ethnic…•2016

  • From Online Political Posting to Mansplaining

    Open Access•Karolina Koc-Michalska, Anya Schiffrin et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2019

  • Reexamining the Use of Tentative Language in Emails

    Open Access•Rong Ma, Anita Atwell Seate•Journal of Language and Social…•2017

  • Aggression, Disempowerment, and Feminism in the “Scum Men” Discourse on Chinese Social Media

    Du Yiwei•Critical Arts•2025

  • Dialogic Status in Design Education

    Open Access•R K Sawyer•Social Psychology Quarterly•2019

  • Contextual Variables as Predictors of Verb Form

    Open Access•Lori Czerwionka, Bruno Staszkiewicz et al.•Languages•2023

  • Talk like a man, walk like a woman

    Tsfira Grebelsky-Lichtman, Liron Bdolach•Journal of Legislative Studies•2017

  • Intellectual humility's effects on political polarization and engagement

    Open Access•Natalie Jomini Stroud, Caroline Murray•Human Communication Research•2025

  • Reconceptualizing interruptions in talk-in-interaction

    Phalangchok Wanphet•Langage et société•2020

  • The use of the discourse markers yaʕni and ʔinnu

    Open Access•Rishad Habib•Journal of Pragmatics•2021

  • When a man debates a woman

    Tsfira Grebelsky-Lichtman, Roy Katz•Journal of Gender Studies•2019

  • Social class and gender impacting change in bilingual settings

    Open Access•Naomi Lapidus Shin, Naomi Shin et al.•Language in Society•2013

  • ‘Women’s Language’ or ‘Powerless Language’?

    Open Access•William M O’barr, Bowman K Atkins•The New Sociolinguistics Reader•2009

  • Men and Women in Interaction

    Elizabeth Aries•Men and women in interaction•1996

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Variations in Adults' Language Use

    Open Access•Campbell Leaper, Melanie M Ayres•Personality and Social Psychology…•2007

  • Trim and Fill

    Open Access•Sue Duval, Richard Tweedie et al.•Biometrics•2000

  • Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

    Open Access•Matthias Egger, Gregory D Smith et al.•BMJ•1997

  • The gender similarities hypothesis.

    Janet Shibley Hyde•American Psychologist•2005

  • Gendered Lives

    Beschara Karam•Gender questions•2016

  • Putting gender into context

    Kay Deaux, Brenda Major•Psychological Review•1987

  • The science and politics of comparing women and men

    Alice H Eagly•American Psychologist•1995

  • Men's and Women's Use of Intensifiers and Hedges in Problem-Solving Interaction

    James J Bradac, Anthony Mulac et al.•Research on Language and Social…•1995

  • Male/female language differences and effects in same‐sex and mixed‐sex dyads

    Anthony Mulac, John M Wiemann et al.•Communication Monographs•1988

  • Male/female language differences and attributional consequences in a public speaking situation

    Anthony Mulac, Torborg Louisa Lundell et al.•Communication Monographs•1986

  • A cautionary note

    Open Access•Beverly I Fagot•Sex Roles•1985

  • Women's language

    Open Access•Julie R McMillan, A Kay Clifton et al.•Sex Roles•1977

  • Meta-Analyses of Gender Effects on Conversational Interruption

    Open Access•Kristin J Anderson, Campbell Leaper•Sex Roles•1998

  • Organizational Contexts and Conversation Patterns

    Cathryn Johnson, Stephanie J Funk et al.•Social Psychology Quarterly•1998

  • Two's Company

    Cecilia H Solano, Mina Dunnam•Social Psychology Quarterly•1985

  • Gender Differences in Language Use

    Matthew L Newman, Carla J Groom et al.•Discourse Processes•2008

  • Language, the Sexes, and Society

    Nora Cate Schaeffer, Philip M Smith•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1986

  • Division of labor in conversations

    Open Access•Linda M Mcmullen, Anne E Vernon et al.•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•1995

  • Multiple Determinants of a Stigmatized Speech Style

    Open Access•D L Rubin, Marie Wilson Nelson•Language and Speech•1983

  • Goals as a mediator of gender differences in high-affiliation dyadic conversations

    Jonell Strough, Cynthia A Berg•Developmental Psychology•2000

  • A variance explanation paradox

    Robert P Abelson•Psychological Bulletin•1985

  • Changes in women's assertiveness in response to status and roles

    J M Twenge•Journal of Personality and Social…•2001

  • Gender Preferential Responses to Speech

    Open Access•Annette Hannah, Tamar Murachver•Journal of Language and Social…•2007

  • Gender, language, and influence

    Linda L Carli•Journal of Personality and Social…•1990

  • A comparative analysis of mother-father speech in the naturalistic home environment

    Open Access•Ellen G Hladik, H T Edwards•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•1984

  • Gender and Hedging

    Open Access•John A Dixon, John Dixon et al.•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•1997

  • Gender, Legitimate Authority, and Leader-Subordinate Conversations

    Cathryn Johnson•American Sociological Review•1994

  • Sex and Power in Interaction

    Peter Kollock, Philip Blumstein et al.•American Sociological Review•1985

  • Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability

    Alice H Eagly, Linda L Carli•Psychological Bulletin•1981

  • Language and woman's place

    Open Access•Lenora A Timm•Lingua•1976

  • Sex similarities and differences in stance in informal American conversation1

    Open Access•Kristen Precht•Journal of Sociolinguistics•2008

  • The female register

    Open Access•Faye Crosby, Faye J Crosby et al.•Language in Society•1977

  • Speech differences between women and men on the wrong track

    Open Access•Dede Brouwer, Marinel Gerritsen et al.•Language in Society•1979

  • Language and woman's place

    Open Access•Robin Lakoff, Robin Tolmach Lakoff•Language in Society•1973

  • Interaction

    Pamela M Fishman•Social Problems•1978

  • Language, Gender Salience, and Social Influence

    Open Access•Scott A Reid, Natasha Keerie et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2003

  • Female and Male Managers' and Professionals' Criticism Giving

    Open Access•Anthony Mulac, David R Seibold et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2000

Unique citing works37
Citations per year2,85
Citation span2013 - 2026 (14)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 37

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae