Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research

I. Theoretical and Epistemological Issues

Bibliographic Data

ID12005457
AuthorsNicole M Else-Quest (0000-0002-4177-2395, Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA, corresponding author), Janet Shibley Hyde (0000-0001-7372-3902, University of Wisconsin–Madison)
Year2016
Volume40
Issue2
Pages155-170
Publication date2016-02-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychology of Women Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0361-6843 • E-ISSN: 1471-6402
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0361684316629797
OpenAlexW2393537175
LanguageEN
Citations received182
References cited79

Intersectionality has become something of a buzzword in psychology and is well-known in feminist writings throughout the social sciences. Across diverse definitions of intersectionality, we find three common assumptions: (1) There is a recognition that all people are characterized simultaneously by multiple social categories and that these categories are interconnected or intertwined. (2) Embedded within each of these categories is a dimension of inequality or power. (3) These categories are properties of the individual as well as characteristics of the social context inhabited by those individuals; as such, categories and their significance may be fluid and dynamic. Understanding intersectionality as an approach and critical theory, rather than as a falsifiable theory, we consider its potential within research using quantitative methods. We discuss positivism, social constructionism, and standpoint epistemology in order to examine the implications of these epistemologies for research methods and to explore how compatible an intersectional approach may be with each. With an eye toward expanding the incorporation of intersectional approaches in the psychology of women, we discuss both the challenges and the potential of combining quantitative methods and intersectionality. We contend that quantitative methods can be used within an intersectional approach and that doing so will expand and develop the study of intersectionality, insofar as more research tools will be available to intersectionality researchers. We also contend that quantitative researchers should incorporate an intersectional approach into their work and that doing so will enrich and deepen our understanding of psychological constructs and processes

Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Intersectionality · Positivism · Sociology · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Gender Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub