Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Perceived Value of Direct and Indirect Influence Strategies

A Cross-Cultural Comparison

Bibliographic Data

ID12005679
AuthorsJanice M Steil (The Derner Institute, Adelphi University, corresponding author), Jennifer Hillman (0000-0003-1435-1971, Adelphi University), Jennifer L Hillman (The Derner Institute, Adelphi University)
Year1993
Volume17
Issue4
Pages457-462
Publication date1993-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychology of Women Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0361-6843 • E-ISSN: 1471-6402
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1111/j.1471-6402.1993.tb00655.x
OpenAlexW2010295930
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited5

In this study, we assessed the generalizability of the Western preference for direct versus indirect influence strategies and its relation to participant sex, perceptions of participant power, and concerns for politeness among a sample of 138 American, 41 Japanese, and 44 Korean female and male college students. Regardless of cultural group or participant sex, direct strategies were reported as first choice strategies, whereas indirect strategies were cited as strategies of last resort. Participant power, not participant sex, was predictive of the students' reported strategy use. Although the American, Japanese, and Korean students were more similar than different on measures of perceived power and frequency of strategy use, concerns for politeness were reflected in the Japanese and Korean students' less confrontational strategy style

Developmental psychology · Generalizability theory · Perception · Politeness · Power (physics · Preference · Sample (material · Style (visual arts · Value (mathematics · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Cultural Beliefs About Social Influence Strategies of Mexican Immigrant Women and Their Heterosexual Partners

    Open Access•Linda J Beckman, Linda Beckman et al.•Sex Roles•1999

  • Power Distance and Facework Strategies

    Rebecca S Merkin•Journal of Intercultural…•2006

  • Powerlessness and the Use of Indirect Aggression in Friendships

    Open Access•Lauren Duncan, Lauren E Duncan et al.•Sex Roles•2006

  • Gender, Interpersonal Power, and Social Influence

    Open Access•Linda L Carli•Journal of Social Issues•1999

  • Reactions of Heterosexual African American Men to Women's Condom Negotiation Strategies

    Laura L Otto-Salaj, Laura L Otto‐salaj et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•2009

  • Offering and Asking for Help with Domestic Chores in Couple Relationships

    Open Access•Marius Marici, Otilia Clipa et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Cross-cultural influence on communication effectiveness and user interface design

    Open Access•Anping Xie, Pei‐Luen Patrick Rau et al.•International Journal of…•2009

  • Sex effects in the evaluation of influence tactics

    Open Access•Dafna N Izraeli•Journal of Organizational Behavior•1987

  • Gender and Influence Strategies of First Choice and Last Resort

    Open Access•Jacquelyn W White, Mary Roufail•Psychology of Women Quarterly•1989

  • Power strategies in intimate relationships

    Toni Falbo, Letitia Anne Peplau•Journal of Personality and Social…•1980

  • Influence Strategies at Home and at Work

    Open Access•Janice M Steil, Karen Weltman•Journal of Social and Personal…•1992

  • An Investigation of Compliance-Gaining as Politeness

    Open Access•Leslie A Baxter•Human Communication Research•1984

Citations per year0.26
Citation span1999 - 2023 (25)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae