I Just Don’t Get It”
Teachers’ and Students’ Conceptions of Confusion and Implications for Teaching and Learning in the High School English Classroom
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12010020 |
|---|---|
| Authors | S Michael Plaut (corresponding author), Suzanne Plaut |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 391-421 |
| Publication date | 2006-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Curriculum Inquiry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0362-6784 • E-ISSN: 1467-873X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-873x.2006.00364.x |
| OpenAlex | W2077855120 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 22 |
Teachers must gauge students’ understandings and confusions. Yet most research about teacher thinking neglects teachers’ ideas about confusion and students’ perspectives about their interactions with their teacher when they are confused. This study examines two high school English teachers’ and six of their students’ thinking about confusion, addressing two research questions: What sources of information do participants rely on to identify student confusion when students are learning to write about literature? And what do participants’ interpretations of that information reveal about their conceptions of confusion, and of teaching and learning? The author used Stimulated Recall Interview method—videotaping two interactive writing lessons and then interviewing each participant about video segments. Analysis involved grounded theory to develop a two-part theoretical framework. Part I examines information sources participants rely on to identify student confusion (including students’ unconscious nonverbal cues, intentional signals, written work, and private thoughts). Part II examines four interrelated facets of confusion: the nature of confusion (participants’ metaphorical models), types, causes of, and responses to confusion (including who participants felt had agency). Using this framework, the author presents case studies to depict eight participants’ unique conceptions of confusion. Two findings emerged: (1) Participants’ interpretations of confusion revealed their underlying conceptions of understanding, teaching, and learning; (2) Some students’ conceptions of confusion matched their teacher’s conception; others mismatched or were in conflict. Implications for teaching practice and student learning are discussed, including the need for teachers to understand how students understand the role confusion plays in learning
Confusion · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Teacher education · Teaching method · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
How we think.
Research on Teachers’ Pedagogical Thoughts, Judgments, Decisions, and Behavior
Student Argumentative Writing Knowledge and Ability at Three Grade Levels
Classroom discourse. The language of teaching and learning
Opening Dialogue
The Roots of Literacy
Teachers’ Reports of Their Cognitive Processes During Teaching
Integrity in Teaching
The psychology of intelligence
Knowledge and Teaching
Stimulated Recall
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2023 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |