Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From lived experience to lived expertise

How donor-conceived witnesses claim and sustain epistemic authority

Bibliographic Data

ID12023360
AuthorsGiselle Newton (0000-0002-2883-335X, The University of Queensland, corresponding author), Michele Zappavigna (0000-0003-4004-9602, UNSW Sydney), K Drysdale (0000-0001-5545-290X, UNSW Sydney), Christy E Newman (0000-0002-5482-2822, UNSW Sydney)
Year2024
Volume221
Pages89-104
Publication date2024-01-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Pragmatics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0378-2166 • E-ISSN: 1879-1387
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.pragma.2023.12.006
OpenAlexW4390802405
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited33

Scholars in pragmatics have long been interested in how knowledge is construed, contested and legitimised. Much recent work in pragmatics has focused on developing more detailed theoretical understandings of epistemic positioning and epistemic authority, including in institutional contexts which are typically characterised by knowledge asymmetries and power inequalities. Yet the relational consequences of epistemic positioning have received little attention, therefore, this article aimed to investigate how authority and community are simultaneously negotiated in interaction, turn by turn. Taking a social semiotic approach, combining analysis using exchange structure, evidence and epistemic stance frameworks, this article examines a public hearing of the 2010 Senate Committee Inquiry into Donor Conception in Australia. Findings reveal four cumulative discursive patterns: donor-conceived witnesses positioned their lived experience as non-negotiable, cast doubt on fertility practitioners' expertise, layered opinions upon experience and employed recognised knowledges to bolster authority. This article introduces the concept of ‘lived expertise’; that is, authority grounded in experience and sustained through awareness of additional forms of experiential and institutional knowledges. Empirically, this study sheds light on how donor-conceived people – as people with lived experience – expand the subject positions afforded to them in institutional contexts, inviting legitimacy and belonging

Epistemology · Lived experience · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Intra-familial dynamics of knowledge and ignorance experienced by donor-conceived adults in Germany

    Open Access•Tobias Bauer, Anne Meier-Credner•SN Social Sciences•2024

  • Towards work-integrated learning for social justice

    Open Access•Amani Bell, Minahil Khan et al.•Studies in Continuing Education•2026

  • Between discovery and responsibility

    Open Access•Giselle Newton, Emma Kirby et al.•Sociology•2026

  • Conspiracy Thinking in Psychotherapy

    Open Access•Manuel Jakab•Human Arenas•2026

  • Experiencias de personas trans en salud mental. Encuentros, moralidad y pugnas en el dispositivo terapéutico

    Open Access•Édel Granda Viñuelas•Política y Sociedad•2026

  • Survey as an instrument of power

    Open Access•Aswar Aswar, Mutiullah Mutiullah et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2026

  • Donor conception law reform in Queensland

    Open Access•Katharine Gelber•Australian Journal of Political…•2026

  • Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science

    Open Access•C Hart•Critical Discourse Analysis and…•2010

  • Territories of knowledge, territories of experience

    Open Access•J Heritage•Morality of Knowledge in…•2011

  • Beyond Exchange

    Joe Martin, J R Martin•Evaluation in text•2000

  • Evidentiality

    Johanna Nichols, Wallace L Chafe•Evidentiality•1986

  • An Introduction to Functional Grammar

    M A K Halliday, Μ Α Κ Halliday et al.•Introduction to Functional Grammar•2014

  • The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation

    Open Access•Tanya Stivers, L Mondada et al.•Morality of Knowledge in…•2011

  • Relations in Public. Microstudies of the Public Order

    Open Access•Michael Dellwing•Goffman-Handbuch•2022

  • Evidentiality and Epistemic Space

    T Givón•Studies in Language•1982

  • Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse

    Monika Bednarek•Text and Talk•2006

  • Making legitimacy

    Open Access•Annie Madden, K Lancaster et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2021

  • Patient-centredness

    Open Access•Nicola Mead, Peter Bower•Social Science & Medicine•2000

  • Discourse and diversionary justice

    Wen Li•Social Semiotics•2018

  • Experience as Evidence

    Open Access•Kylie Valentine, A Persson et al.•Contemporary Drug Problems•2020

  • The Terms of Agreement

    Open Access•J Heritage, G Raymond•Social Psychology Quarterly•2005

  • Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds

    Open Access•J Heritage•Discourse Studies•2013

  • Legitimizing assertions and the logico-rhetorical module

    Open Access•C Hart•Discourse Studies•2011

  • Epistemics in social interaction

    Open Access•Paul Drew•Discourse Studies•2018

  • Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction

    Open Access•L Mondada•Discourse Studies•2013

  • The field of Epistemic Discourse Analysis

    T A Van Dijk•Discourse Studies•2013

  • The productive techniques and constitutive effects of 'evidence-based policy' and 'consumer participation' discourses in health policy processes

    Open Access•K Lancaster, Kate Seear et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2017

  • Giving a source or basis

    Open Access•A Pomerantz, Anita M Pomerantz•Journal of Pragmatics•1984

  • Inequalities in status

    Open Access•Margaret Berry•Lingua•2021

  • Sociological perspectives on the politics of knowledge in health care

    Caragh Brosnan, Emma Kirby•Health Sociology Review•2016

  • The epistemics of social relations in Murrinhpatha, Garrwa and Jaru conversations

    Open Access•J Blythe, Ilana Mushin et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2022

  • The epistemic grounds of face in institutional argumentative talk-in-interaction

    Open Access•Ahmad Izadi•Journal of Pragmatics•2018

  • Whose decision? Negotiating epistemic and deontic rights in medical treatment decisions

    Open Access•Anne Marie Dalby Landmark, Pål Gulbrandsen et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2015

  • The epistemics of social relations

    Open Access•G Raymond, J Heritage•Language in Society•2006

  • Truth, Proof, Sleuth

    Open Access•Giselle Newton, K Drysdale et al.•Sociology•2023

Unique citing works7
Citations per year3,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae