From lived experience to lived expertise
How donor-conceived witnesses claim and sustain epistemic authority
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12023360 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Giselle Newton (0000-0002-2883-335X, The University of Queensland, corresponding author), Michele Zappavigna (0000-0003-4004-9602, UNSW Sydney), K Drysdale (0000-0001-5545-290X, UNSW Sydney), Christy E Newman (0000-0002-5482-2822, UNSW Sydney) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 221 |
| Pages | 89-104 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Pragmatics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0378-2166 • E-ISSN: 1879-1387 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.12.006 |
| OpenAlex | W4390802405 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 33 |
Scholars in pragmatics have long been interested in how knowledge is construed, contested and legitimised. Much recent work in pragmatics has focused on developing more detailed theoretical understandings of epistemic positioning and epistemic authority, including in institutional contexts which are typically characterised by knowledge asymmetries and power inequalities. Yet the relational consequences of epistemic positioning have received little attention, therefore, this article aimed to investigate how authority and community are simultaneously negotiated in interaction, turn by turn. Taking a social semiotic approach, combining analysis using exchange structure, evidence and epistemic stance frameworks, this article examines a public hearing of the 2010 Senate Committee Inquiry into Donor Conception in Australia. Findings reveal four cumulative discursive patterns: donor-conceived witnesses positioned their lived experience as non-negotiable, cast doubt on fertility practitioners' expertise, layered opinions upon experience and employed recognised knowledges to bolster authority. This article introduces the concept of ‘lived expertise’; that is, authority grounded in experience and sustained through awareness of additional forms of experiential and institutional knowledges. Empirically, this study sheds light on how donor-conceived people – as people with lived experience – expand the subject positions afforded to them in institutional contexts, inviting legitimacy and belonging
Epistemology · Lived experience · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Philosophy · Psychology
Intra-familial dynamics of knowledge and ignorance experienced by donor-conceived adults in Germany
Towards work-integrated learning for social justice
Between discovery and responsibility
Conspiracy Thinking in Psychotherapy
Experiencias de personas trans en salud mental. Encuentros, moralidad y pugnas en el dispositivo terapéutico
Survey as an instrument of power
Donor conception law reform in Queensland
Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science
Territories of knowledge, territories of experience
Beyond Exchange
Evidentiality
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation
Relations in Public. Microstudies of the Public Order
Evidentiality and Epistemic Space
Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse
Making legitimacy
Patient-centredness
Discourse and diversionary justice
Experience as Evidence
The Terms of Agreement
Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds
Legitimizing assertions and the logico-rhetorical module
Epistemics in social interaction
Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction
The field of Epistemic Discourse Analysis
The productive techniques and constitutive effects of 'evidence-based policy' and 'consumer participation' discourses in health policy processes
Giving a source or basis
Inequalities in status
Sociological perspectives on the politics of knowledge in health care
The epistemics of social relations in Murrinhpatha, Garrwa and Jaru conversations
The epistemic grounds of face in institutional argumentative talk-in-interaction
Whose decision? Negotiating epistemic and deontic rights in medical treatment decisions
The epistemics of social relations
Truth, Proof, Sleuth
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |