Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds

Bibliographic Data

ID5966547
AuthorsJ Heritage (0000-0002-8603-6447, University of California, Los Angeles, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume15
Issue5
Pages551-578
Publication date2013-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDiscourse Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1461-4456 • E-ISSN: 1461-7080
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1461445613501449
OpenAlexW4242089161
LanguageEN
Citations received165
References cited67

This article reviews arguments that, in the process of action formation and ascription, the relative status of the participants with respect to a projected action can adjust or trump the action stance conveyed by the linguistic form of the utterance. In general, congruency between status and stance is preferred, and linguistic form is a fairly reliable guide to action ascription. However incongruities between stance and status result in action ascriptions that are at variance with the action stance that is otherwise conveyed in the turn. This argument is presented, first, in relation to epistemic status and stance where the process is argued to be both fundamental and universal across all declarative and interrogative utterances. Some consequences of this way of viewing action are discussed. The argument is then briefly extended to deontics and benefactives

Ascription · Epistemology · Interrogative · Linguistics · Presupposition · Utterance · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Therapeutic change and the emergence of common ground over interactional history

    Open Access•Arnulf Deppermann, Alexandra Gubina•Research on Language and Social…•2026

  • Interactional histories

    Open Access•Arnulf Deppermann, Pentti Haddington•Research on Language and Social…•2026

  • Taking care of inpatients’ relatives

    Open Access•L Caronia, Federica Ranzani et al.•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2026

  • Mitigation and facework

    Open Access•Jessica Marsh•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2026

  • Expertises partagées en médecine générale

    Open Access•Xavier Gradoux•Cahiers du Centre de Linguistique…•2015

  • A Systematic Review of Second-Person Knowledge Acquisition in First-Encounter Interactions

    Open Access•Xuehua Lai, Mei-Yuit Chan et al.•Theory and Practice in Language…•2023

  • The negotiation of epistemic and deontic rights in child-adult interactions in colloquial Jakartan Indonesian

    Open Access•Rika Mutiara•Language Sciences•2022

  • The epistemic affordance of experiential knowledge

    Open Access•Bin Wang•Applied Linguistics•2026

  • A Longitudinal Perspective on Turn Design

    Open Access•H T Nguyen•Longitudinal Studies on the…•2018

  • Turn design and progression

    Ruey-Jiuan Regina Wu•Chinese Language and Discourse An…•2016

  • Indexing epistemic authority/primacy in Mandarin conversation

    Open Access•Ruey-Jiuan Regina Wu•Journal of Pragmatics•2018

  • Indexing epistemic incongruence

    Open Access•Amparo García-Ramón•Journal of Pragmatics•2018

  • Wartime Language Choice Among Ukrainians in Ukraine and Finland

    Open Access•Yan Kapranov, Maria Frick et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Co-énonciation et mise en circulations des savoirs dans des contextes de travail

    Open Access•Gustavo Ximenes Cunha, Marianne Zogmal•Travaux neuchâtelois de…•2024

  • Contrasting Marked and Unmarked Questions

    Open Access•Rika Mutiara•Linguistik Indonesia•2021

  • Three Multimodal Action Packages in Responses to Proposals During Joint Decision-Making

    Open Access•M Stevanovic•Frontiers in Communication•2021

  • Multimodal signals of high commitment in expert-to-expert contexts

    Open Access•Laura Vincze, Isabella Poggi•Discourse & Communication•2022

  • Constructing young citizens’ deontic authority in participatory democracy meetings

    Open Access•Simon Magnusson•Discourse & Communication•2020

  • Mapping the knowledge structure of pragmatics (1977–2022)

    Qingrong Liu, Jing Liu et al.•Southern African Linguistics and…•2025

  • Unmasking Tension

    Xin Li, Yinong Tian et al.•Health Communication•2026

  • Request for permission to Switch to L1

    Open Access•M Ishino•Linguistics and Education•2022

  • “I like how you begin…” Compliment or feedback? TEs’ subjective positive assessments of student teachers’ microteaching

    Open Access•M Ishino, Eunseok Ro•Linguistics and Education•2025

  • Epistemic trespassing and disagreement

    Open Access•Rachel Bristol, Federico Rossano•Journal of Memory and Language•2020

  • Kedo -ending turn format as a formula for a problem statement with a deontic implication

    Daisuke Yokomori•Journal of Japanese Linguistics•2023

  • L2 Classroom Input and L2 Positionally Sensitive Grammars

    Open Access•Joan Kelly Hall•Modern Language Journal•2022

  • Between Turn and Sequence

    Open Access•Scott Saft•Contrastive Pragmatics•2022

  • Affordances and Actions

    Open Access•Uwe-A Küttner, Oliver Ehmer•Contrastive Pragmatics•2023

  • “Tú sabes lo que le pasa a él?”

    Open Access•Andrea Rodríguez, Valeria Sinkeviciute•Contrastive Pragmatics•2023

  • How grammar grows out of social interaction

    Open Access•Simona Pekarek Doehler•Open Linguistics•2021

  • Rhetorical questions and epistemic stance in an Italian Facebook corpus during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Ilaria Riccioni, Andrzej Zuczkowski et al.•Open Linguistics•2025

  • Questions and epistemic stance

    Open Access•Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni et al.•Ampersand•2018

  • Recruiting help in everyday research work

    Open Access•Fabíola Stein•Learning Culture and Social…•2025

  • An epistemic interpretation of responses to advice resistance on Chinese phone-ins of family problem counseling

    Open Access•Zhuo Peng•Pragmatics and Society•2023

  • When TCM debate meets Covid-19 discourse

    Open Access•Yun Pan, Altman Yuzhu Peng•Pragmatics and Society•2025

  • Searching for the unit of meaning

    Open Access•Yun Pan•Applied Linguistics Review•2022

  • Achieving epistemic alignment in a psycholinguistic experiment

    Kyoko Kobayashi Hillman, Steven J Ro et al.•Applied Linguistics Review•2018

  • Exploring the intersection between collective and hierarchical leadership in online team meetings in Turkey

    Open Access•Özlem Özbakış, Hale Işık Güler et al.•Discourse & Communication•2026

  • Throwing the baby out with the bath water? Commentary on the criticism of the ‘Epistemic Program’

    Open Access•Jakob Steensig, T Heinemann•Discourse Studies•2016

  • The ‘parent’ category as an interactional resource in a sibling dispute over sharing

    Open Access•Valeria Sinkeviciute•Discourse Studies•2025

  • A different perspective on epistemics and deontics

    Open Access•Dorien Van De Mieroop, M Stevanovic et al.•Narrative Inquiry•2024

  • Accomplishing irony

    Open Access•Carolus H C J van Nijnatten, Maureen T Matarese et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2017

  • Children’s involvement in interpreter-mediated parent–teacher conferences

    Federica Ceccoli•Perspectives•2024

  • The Organization of the Treatment Recommendation Phase in Routine Psychiatric Visits

    G B Bolden, Beth Angell•Research on Language and Social…•2017

  • Aphasia and Open Format Other-Initiation of Repair

    Barne•Research on Language and Social…•2016

  • Interaction at the Boundaries of a World Known in Common

    G Raymond, Jack Sidnell•Research on Language and Social…•2019

  • At the Intersection of Epistemics and Action

    L Mikesell, G B Bolden et al.•Research on Language and Social…•2017

  • Calculating Costs or Weighing Social Relations? The Basis of the ‘Benefactive Order’ in Interaction

    Open Access•Ibi Baxter-Webb•Research on Language and Social…•2025

  • The First Step in Triadic Decision-Making Involving People with Dementia

    Open Access•Isabel Windeatt-Harrison, Thomas Walker et al.•Research on Language and Social…•2024

  • The Alignment of Manual and Verbal Displays in Requests for the Repair of an Object

    Barbara A Fox, T Heinemann•Research on Language and Social…•2015

  • Fill-in-the-Blank Questions in Interaction

    Rasmus Persson•Research on Language and Social…•2017

  • Invoking the Complainer’s Past Transgressions

    M Pino•Research on Language and Social…•2018

  • Coding actions in social interaction

    Open Access•Arnulf Deppermann, Alexandra Gubina•Research on Language and Social…•2025

  • Epistemics in post‐match interviews

    Open Access•Antje Wilton•International Journal of Applied…•2021

  • Evidential Strategies in Chinese Social‐Mediated Communication

    Open Access•Yun Pan•International Journal of Applied…•2025

  • Stance in [in]action

    Katharine Parton, G Edwards•Australian Journal of Linguistics•2025

  • Textual Relations as Procedures for Action Ascription in Interaction

    Open Access•Gustavo Ximenes Cunha•Alfa•2024

  • As Relações Textuais Como Procedimentos Para a Atribuição De Ações Na Interação

    Open Access•Gustavo Ximenes Cunha•Alfa•2024

  • Beyond language fluidity

    Lupe Rincon-Mendoza•International Journal of…•2023

  • Meaning construction in interactive academic talk

    Open Access•Yun Pan•Pragmatics & Cognition•2019

  • Practices of indexing discrepant assumptions with German ich dachte (‘I thought’) in talk-in-interaction

    Open Access•Arnulf Deppermann, Silke Reineke•Functions of Language•2020

  • The epistemic stance between the author and reader

    Open Access•D S Mcnamara•Discourse Studies•2013

  • Preference and embodiment in an oral preschool classroom

    Kristella Montiegel•Research on Children and Social…•2023

  • ‘I was just thinking’

    I Hutchby, Michelle O’reilly et al.•Research on Children and Social…•2021

  • Centering a Young Child through Care and Trust to Lead a Co-Observation Relational Learning Ecology

    D Teo Keifert, Team Poof•Research on Children and Social…•2026

  • Online forum advice for carers of people living with dementia

    Felicity Slocombe•QMiP Bulletin•2021

  • Morphosyntactic Resources in Action Formation

    Open Access•Yingsheng Liu•Languages•2026

  • Strategies of marking epistemic commitment with discourse markers and prosodic features by native and non-native Chinese speakers

    Open Access•Lin Zhu•Ampersand•2026

  • Co-constituting face in doctor-patient interactions

    Open Access•Ahmad Izadi•Journal of Pragmatics•2026

  • Addressing information discrepancies in conversation

    Open Access•Yaxin Wu, Zhou Xiao-li et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2020

  • Simultaneity of certainty in Turkish Sign Language (TİD)

    Open Access•Serpil Karabüklü•Journal of Pragmatics•2024

  • From lived experience to lived expertise

    Open Access•Giselle Newton, Michele Zappavigna et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2024

  • Epistemic independence and speaker roles

    Open Access•Amparo García-Ramón•Journal of Pragmatics•2021

  • Competitive points in Mandarin-speaking multiparty interaction

    Open Access•Jessie Chen, Barne et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2024

  • The encoding of epistemic operations in two Romance languages

    Open Access•Pilar Prieto, Paolo Roseano•Journal of Pragmatics•2021

  • I think and I know

    Open Access•Jilan Wei•Journal of Pragmatics•2024

  • Epistemic asymmetries in psychotherapy interaction

    Open Access•Elina Weiste, L Voutilainen et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2016

  • Fact Construction and Categorization in Assessment

    Eunjung Lee•Social Service Review•2022

  • The more we verify it, the more truth there is’

    Open Access•Karel Čada, Petra A Honová•International Review of Public…•2021

  • Conversation analysis and power

    Open Access•Mats Ekström, M Stevanovic•Frontiers in Sociology•2023

  • Negotiating Renditions in and through Talk

    Open Access•Laura Gavioli•Lingue Culture Mediazioni -…•2015

  • Pupils’interactions and decision-making in an educational game

    Open Access•Senja Celius, Fredrik Rusk et al.•Education Inquiry•2025

  • Group work as an arena for learning in STEM education

    Open Access•Fredrik Rusk, Wenche Rønning•Education Inquiry•2019

  • Hermeneutic injustice and troubling experiences of interactional inequality

    Open Access•M Stevanovic, Minna Leinonen et al.•Text and Talk•2026

  • Nǐ kànzhe bàn ba

    Xu Huang, Yaxuan Ran•Text and Talk•2023

  • Narratives about epistemic trespassing

    Rachel Bristol, Samar Alhaqab et al.•Text and Talk•2024

  • Epistemic engine, deontic driver

    Open Access•Ahmad Reza Izadi•Discourse & Communication•2026

  • A deontic perspective on the collaborative, multimodal accomplishment of leadership

    Open Access•Dorien Van De Mieroop•Leadership•2019

  • Being Heard, Exerting Influence, or Knowing How to Play the Game? Expectations of Client Involvement among Social and Health Care Professionals and Clients

    Open Access•Elina Weiste, Sari Käpykangas et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Voicing experiences of ageist nonrecognition in performance appraisal interaction

    Open Access•Antero Olakivi, M Stevanovic et al.•Culture and Organization•2024

  • Relações Epistêmicas E Impolidez Linguística Em Comentários Do Twitter/X Sobre Um Debate Presidencial

    Open Access•Ana Larissa Adorno Marciotto Oliveira, Gustavo Ximenes Cunha•Linguagem em (Dis)curso•2024

  • Stories of Change

    Open Access•Aija Logren, Johanna Ruusuvuori et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2020

  • Vicissitudes of laughter

    Open Access•Kevin Mckenzie•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2022

  • Framing in interactive academic talk

    Open Access•Yun Pan•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2022

  • The epistemic marking of questions in Colloquial Jakartan Indonesian

    Open Access•Rika Mutiara•Language Sciences•2026

  • Beyond definiteness

    Open Access•Ahmad Izadi•Language Sciences•2025

  • The Problem of Context in the Analysis of Social Action

    Open Access•Kevin A Whitehead•Social Psychology Quarterly•2020

  • When hedging helps, rather than impedes, communication

    Delphine Dahan•Discourse Processes•2025

  • Same and Different

    Marie Tanner, Fritjof Sahlström•Discourse Processes•2018

  • Making a Case for Client Insistence in Social Work Interaction

    Maureen T Matarese, Carolus Van Nijnatten•Discourse Processes•2015

  • Communicating Epistemic Stance

    Paolo Roseano, Montserrat González et al.•Discourse Processes•2016

  • Using Language

    Open Access•Herbert H Clark•Using Language•1996

  • Beyond Rhetorical Questions

    Irene Koshik•Beyond Rhetorical Questions•2005

  • Presumptive Meanings

    C Levinson, Stephen C Levinson•Presumptive Meanings•2000

  • Power

    Open Access•Steven Lukes•Power•1974

  • Talk in Action

    Open Access•J Heritage, E Clayman et al.•Talk in Action•2010

  • The System of Professions

    Andrew Abbott•System of Professions•1988

  • Territory of Information

    Akio Kamio•Territory of Information•1997

  • Territories of knowledge, territories of experience

    Open Access•J Heritage•Morality of Knowledge in…•2011

  • V.—indexical Expressions

    Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua Bar‐hillel•Mind•1954

  • Assertion

    Robert C Stalnaker•Pragmatics•1978

  • Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement

    J Heritage•The language of turn and sequence•2002

  • Sequence Organization in Interaction

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•Sequence Organization in…•2007

  • Hegel

    Open Access•G W F Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Fredrich Hegel et al.•Hegel•1991

  • Person Reference in Interaction

    Open Access•N J Enfield, Tanya Stivers•Person Reference in Interaction•2007

  • Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction

    Open Access•T Stivers, L Mondada et al.•Morality of Knowledge in…•2011

  • Origins of Human Communication

    M Tomasello•Origins of human communication•2008

  • Epistemic Vigilance

    Open Access•Dan Sperber, Fabrice Clément et al.•Mind & Language•2010

  • Managing participation in interaction

    M Stevanovic•Text and Talk•2013

  • Rights and Responsibilities in Calls for Help

    G Raymond, Don H Zimmerman•Research on Language and Social…•2007

  • Deontic Authority in Interaction

    M Stevanovic, Anssi Peräkylä•Research on Language and Social…•2012

  • Contingency and Action

    Traci S Curl, Paul Drew•Research on Language and Social…•2008

  • Motherhood, Medicine, and Morality

    J Heritage, Anna Lindström et al.•Research on Language and Social…•1998

  • Modified Repeats

    T Stivers•Research on Language and Social…•2005

  • Epistemics in Action

    J Heritage•Research on Language and Social…•2012

  • The Terms of Agreement

    Open Access•J Heritage, G Raymond•Social Psychology Quarterly•2005

  • The Epistemic Engine

    J Heritage•Research on Language and Social…•2012

  • Mobilizing Response

    T Stivers, Federico Rossano•Research on Language and Social…•2010

  • Prosodic salience and the emergence of new decisions

    Open Access•M Stevanovic•Journal of Pragmatics•2012

  • An overview of the question–response system in American English conversation

    Open Access•T Stivers•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

  • Establishing joint decisions in a dyad

    Open Access•M Stevanovic•Discourse Studies•2012

  • Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling

    T Stivers•Research on Language and Social…•2008

  • Mundane Reasoning

    Open Access•Melvin Pollner•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•1974

  • Evidentiality

    Alexandra Y Aikhenvald, A I͡U Aĭkhenvalʹd•Evidentiality•2004

  • The Very Coinage of Your Brain

    Open Access•Melvin Pollner•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•1975

  • Questioning and responding in Italian

    Open Access•Federico Rossano•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

  • Opening up Closings

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff, Harvey Sacks•Semiotica•1973

  • Grammar and Social Organization

    G Raymond•American Sociological Review•2003

  • A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions

    Open Access•Irene Koshik•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

  • Presequences and indirection

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•Journal of Pragmatics•1988

  • On the myth of rising intonation in polar questions

    Open Access•Ronald Geluykens•Journal of Pragmatics•1988

  • The limits of questioning

    Open Access•J Heritage•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

  • Will you or can't you

    Open Access•T Heinemann•Journal of Pragmatics•2006

  • A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation

    Open Access•Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A Schegloff et al.•Language•2025

  • Selecting next speaker

    Open Access•Gene H Lerner•Language in Society•2003

  • Transformative answers

    Open Access•T Stivers, Makoto Hayashi•Language in Society•2010

  • The epistemics of social relations

    Open Access•G Raymond, J Heritage•Language in Society•2006

  • Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences

    Open Access•J Heritage, Marja-Leena Sorjonen•Language in Society•1994

  • Mood and Modality

    Open Access•F R Palmer•Mood and Modality•2001

  • When Words Fail

    Jack Whalen, Don H Zimmerman et al.•Social Problems•1988

  • Telling My Side

    Open Access•A Pomerantz•Sociological Inquiry•1980

  • Confirming Allusions

    Emanuel A Schegloff•American Journal of Sociology•1996

  • Repair After Next Turn

    Emanuel A Schegloff•American Journal of Sociology•1992

  • Speech Acts

    Open Access•John R Searle•Speech acts•1969

Unique citing works165
Citations per year12,69
Citation span2013 - 2026 (14)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 157

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae