Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Beyond Rhetorical Questions

Assertive questions in everyday interaction

Bibliographic Data

ID23397910
AuthorsIrene Koshik (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, corresponding author)
Year2005
Publication date2005-05-26
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueBeyond Rhetorical Questions (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/sidag.16
OpenAlexW612493583
Open LibraryOL38638724M
ISBN9789027226266
LanguageEN
Citations received122

This book uses Conversation Analysis methodology to analyze rhetorical and other questions that are designed to convey assertions, rather than seek new information. It shows how these question sequences unfold interactionally in naturally-occurring talk in a variety of settings, e.g., friends arguing over the phone, parents disciplining children, news interviews, and second language writing conferences. The questions are used across these widely different contexts to perform a number of related social actions such as accusations, challenges to prior turns, and complaints. Those used in institution settings, such as teacher-student conferences, orient to institutional norms and roles and can help accomplish institutional goals, e.g., eliciting student error correction. Both the interactional context in which these questions are embedded and the known epistemic authority of the questioner play a role in our understanding of these questions, i.e., what social actions the question is accomplishing in a particular interaction.

Context (archaeology) · Conversation · Conversation analysis · Discourse analysis · Institution · Linguistics · Phone · Rhetorical question · Social science · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics) · Communication · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Psychology · Social Psychology · Questioning

  • Trust in Social Robots

    Open Access•Gustav Lymer, Silvia Kunitz et al.•Symbolic Interaction•2026

  • An interactional history of categorization and reference to an embodied action

    Open Access•Arnulf Deppermann, Axel Schmidt•Research on Language and Social…•2026

  • Affordances and Actions

    Open Access•Uwe-A Küttner, Oliver Ehmer•Contrastive Pragmatics•2023

  • The public loneliness of endurance athletes

    Open Access•Alla V Tovares•Discourse Context & Media•2020

  • Agency, accountability and evaluations of impoliteness

    Natalie Mitchell, Michael Haugh•Journal of Politeness Research•2015

  • This is not an interrogative

    Open Access•Pavel Ozerov•Language Sciences•2019

  • A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring

    Open Access•Mi-Suk Seo, Irene Koshik•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

  • Short replies in Italian

    Open Access•Cecilia Andorno, Fabiana Rosi•Journal of Pragmatics•2015

  • Pursuing a question

    Open Access•Alan Zemel, Timothy Koschmann•Journal of Pragmatics•2011

  • They are so stupid, so stupid. Emotional affect in Estonian school-related complaints

    Open Access•Andriela Rääbis, Tiit Hennoste et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2019

  • When suspects ask questions

    Open Access•Marijana Cerović•Journal of Pragmatics•2016

  • Beyond answering

    Open Access•Lena Gialabouki, Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou•Journal of Pragmatics•2019

  • Questions and their responses in Tzeltal

    Open Access•Penelope Brown•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

  • Answering questions about the unquestionable in Korean conversation

    M S Kim•Journal of Pragmatics•2013

  • From turn-taking to stance-taking

    Open Access•Chen-Yu Chester Hsieh, Chen‐yu Hsieh•Journal of Pragmatics•2018

  • Questions and responses in Korean conversation

    Open Access•Kyung-Eun Yoon•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

  • Negatively valenced questions with the Korean subject particle ka

    Open Access•M S Kim•Journal of Pragmatics•2021

  • Assertive questions in Máíhĩki

    Open Access•Amalia Skilton•Journal of Pragmatics•2017

  • An overview of the question–response system in Japanese

    Open Access•Makoto Hayashi•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

  • Addressing information discrepancies in conversation

    Open Access•Yaxin Wu, Zhou Xiao-li et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2020

  • Requests

    Open Access•I Park•Language & Communication•2015

  • Talk from the top down

    Open Access•D Cameron•Language & Communication•2008

  • Vestluskaaslase reaktsioonid kurtmisele kooliteemalistes argivestlustes

    Open Access•Andriela Rääbis, Tiit Hennoste et al.•The Yearbook of the Estonian…•2020

  • Comment ne pas perdre le tête

    Pierre Larrivée, Estelle Moline•Bulletin de la Société de…•2009

  • Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition

    D Atkinson•Alternative approaches to second…•2011

  • Indexing Uncertainty

    Veronika Drake•Research on Language and Social…•2015

  • ‘The benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks… they say’

    Open Access•Ilaria Riccioni, Alessia Bertolazzi et al.•Language and Dialogue•2024

  • The interactional functions of the news response token A (啊) in Mandarin conversation

    Open Access•Hongyuan Liu, Shuangyun Yao•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • Trudne pytania o los Ojczyzny. Konstrukcje pytające na transparentach z ukraińskich protestów ulicznych w lipcu 2025 roku

    Open Access•Alan Tułacz•Studia Ukrainica Posnaniensia•2025

  • The ubiquity of word-internal pauses

    Open Access•Ludger Paschen•Linguistic Typology•2026

  • Students’ Questions in Writing Center Conferences

    Open Access•Jo Mackiewicz, Isabelle Thompson•Written Communication•2022

  • How an utterance is regarded as implying disagreement

    Jiayu Feng•Journal of Japanese Linguistics•2022

  • Rhetorical questions and epistemic stance in an Italian Facebook corpus during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Ilaria Riccioni, Andrzej Zuczkowski et al.•Open Linguistics•2025

  • Request for confirmation sequences in Low German

    Open Access•Kathrin Weber•Open Linguistics•2024

  • Rhetorical questions as reproaching devices

    Open Access•Marta Albelda Marco•Journal of Language Aggression…•2023

  • Attending to a possible complaint

    Eleni Karafoti•Journal of Language Aggression…•2019

  • Single episode analysis of extended conflict talk sequences in second language classroom discussion

    Yuri Hosoda, David Aline•Journal of Language Aggression…•2015

  • Accusations and interpersonal conflict in televised multi-party interactions amongst speakers of (Argentinian and Peninsular) Spanish

    Michael Haugh, Valeria Sinkeviciute•Journal of Language Aggression…•2018

  • Gestural strategies in questions during monological discourse

    Manon Lelandais•Linguistics Vanguard•2025

  • Culture-generality and culture-specificity of face

    Ahmad Izadi•Pragmatics and Society•2017

  • Withholding consent

    Open Access•Lotte Van Burgsteden, Hedwig Te Molder•Pragmatics and Society•2021

  • A contrastive study of Chinese and American online complaints

    Open Access•Ming Wei•Pragmatics and Society•2024

  • When questioners count on recipients’ lack of knowledge

    Anna-Claudia Ticca, Véronique Traverso•Pragmatics and Society•2016

  • Challenges of Interviewers' Institutional Positionings

    Karen Tracy, J S Robles•Communication Methods and Measures•2010

  • Sequential organization of hinting in online task-oriented L2 interaction

    Ufuk Balaman•Text and Talk•2019

  • Divergence in uncertainty

    Don Lee•Text and Talk•2022

  • The word isn't there!’

    Shiao‐yun Chiang•Critical Discourse Studies•2013

  • The case of question-based exclamatives

    Open Access•Ruti Bardenstein•Intercultural Pragmatics•2022

  • Porridge and misogyny

    Open Access•Anna Mae Ridley, Anna Ridley et al.•Feminism & Psychology•2023

  • The interactional negotiation of group membership and ethnicity

    Open Access•Dorien Van De Mieroop, Jonathan Clifton•Discourse & Society•2012

  • Does gender matter? A cross-national investigation of primary class-room discipline

    Joanne Mcdowell, Revert Klattenberg•Gender and Education•2018

  • Responses to Wh -Questions in English Conversation

    Barbara A Fox, Scott A Thompson•Research on Language and Social…•2010

  • Revisiting Preference Organization in Context

    Jeffrey D Robinson•Research on Language and Social…•2020

  • Remembering Relevant Information and Withholding Relevant Next Actions

    Elisabeth Betz, Andrea Golato•Research on Language and Social…•2008

  • Imperative Directives

    Alexandra Kent, Kobin H Kendrick•Research on Language and Social…•2016

  • Interaction at the Boundaries of a World Known in Common

    G Raymond, Jack Sidnell•Research on Language and Social…•2019

  • Countering Prior Interactional Conduct with Responsive doch in German Talk-in-Interaction

    Open Access•Alexandra Gubina•Research on Language and Social…•2025

  • Noticing Breaches with Nonpolar Interrogatives

    Kirsi Laanesoo, Kirsi Laanesoo-Kalk et al.•Research on Language and Social…•2017

  • Hebrew ken ? (Yes?)

    Open Access•Michal Marmorstein, Nadav Matalon•Research on Language and Social…•2025

  • Who Knew

    R Clift•Research on Language and Social…•2012

  • Student-Initiated Advice in Academic Supervision

    Sanna Vehviläinen•Research on Language and Social…•2009

  • Responding With Resistance to Wh -Questions in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction

    Makoto Hayashi, Shuya Kushida•Research on Language and Social…•2013

  • Epistemics in Action

    J Heritage•Research on Language and Social…•2012

  • What Do Newsmark-Type Responses Invite? The Response Space After German echt

    Open Access•Alexandra Gubina, Elisabeth Betz•Research on Language and Social…•2021

  • Polar Questions, Response Preference, and the Tasks of Political Positioning in Journalism

    E Clayman, Laura Loeb•Research on Language and Social…•2018

  • When Claims of Understanding Are Less Than Affiliative

    Ann Weatherall, L Keevallik•Research on Language and Social…•2016

  • Sighing in Interaction

    Open Access•Elliott M Hoey•Research on Language and Social…•2014

  • One Type of Polar, Information-Seeking Question and Its Stance of Probability

    Jeffrey D Robinson•Research on Language and Social…•2020

  • Tools of Engagement

    J Blythe, R Gardner et al.•Research on Language and Social…•2018

  • Action categorization in Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics

    Arnulf Deppermann, Alexandra Gubina•Research on Language and Social…•2026

  • Pursuing Common Ground

    Wei Wang•Research on Language and Social…•2021

  • Initiating Repair With and Without Particles

    M S Kim, Stephanie Hyeri Kim•Research on Language and Social…•2014

  • It's Training Man’! Membership Categorization and the Institutional Moral Order of Basketball Training

    Bryn Evans, Richard Fitzgerald•Australian Journal of Linguistics•2016

  • When language bites

    Sabina Tabacaru•Pragmatics & Cognition•2017

  • Alternatives to QUD

    Open Access•Pavel Ozerov•Functions of Language•2022

  • Soliciting Accounts With Why-Interrogatives in Conversation

    Open Access•G B Bolden, Jeffrey D Robinson•Journal of Communication•2011

  • Who’s speaking for whom

    Open Access•Mingjian Xiang, Esther Pascual et al.•Journal of Historical Pragmatics•2022

  • Constructionalized rhetorical questions from negatively biased to negation polarity

    Open Access•Ruti Bardenstein•Journal of Historical Pragmatics•2022

  • Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds

    Open Access•J Heritage•Discourse Studies•2013

  • Turn-initial ki ‘because’-clauses as a rhetorical responsive practice in Hebrew Facebook comments

    Open Access•Leon Shor, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar et al.•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2026

  • Conversation Analysis in Applied Linguistics

    Open Access•G Kasper, Johannes Wagner•Annual Review of Applied…•2014

  • Negotiating Post-Consultation ‘Homework’ Tasks Between Counselors and Clients

    Open Access•Tom Strong, Helen Massfeller et al.•International Journal for the…•2010

  • Second/Foreign Language Learning as a Social Accomplishment

    Open Access•Alan Firth, Johannes Wagner•Modern Language Journal•2007

  • Polar answers

    Open Access•N J Enfield, T Stivers et al.•Journal of Linguistics•2018

  • What Does “Resistance” Actually Look Like? The Respecification of Resistance as an Interactional Accomplishment

    Open Access•Bogdana Humă, J B Joyce et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2023

  • The Task of the Chinese Translator

    Shawn Normandin•ANQ A Quarterly Journal of Short…•2024

  • Pragmatic functions of lê ‘what’ in Longxi Qiang

    Open Access•Wuxi Zheng•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2025

  • The discursive management of identity in interviews with female former colonials of the Belgian Congo

    Open Access•Dorien Van De Mieroop, Jonathan Clifton•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2015

  • The pragmeme of disagreement and its allopracts in English and Serbian political interview discourse

    Open Access•Milica Radulović, Vladimir Ž Jovanović•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2020

  • Alternative questions and their responses in English interaction

    Open Access•Veronika Drake•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2021

  • Pragmatics and cultural institutions

    Open Access•María Isabel Hernández Toribio•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2025

  • Reported Thought as a Stance-Taking Device in Korean Conversation

    M S Kim•Discourse Processes•2014

  • Initiating Repair and Beyond

    Ruey-Jiuan Regina Wu•Discourse Processes•2006

  • Reflecting on the Research Interview as a Socializing Interaction

    Open Access•Debra A Friedman•TESOL Quarterly•2020

  • Layers of Oriented‐to Identities in Language Learner Peer Discussion Tasks

    Open Access•David Aline, Yuri Hosoda•TESOL Quarterly•2024

  • Analyzing Storytelling In Tesol Interview Research

    Open Access•G Kasper, Matthew T Prior•TESOL Quarterly•2015

  • I’m not going to have a conversation with you

    James Pérez•Communication and Democracy•2022

  • The Assertoric Nod

    Open Access•Ruey-Jiuan Regina Wu, J Heritage•Discourse Studies•2025

  • Asking different types of polar questions

    Open Access•I Park•Discourse Studies•2012

  • Justifying the jihad

    Jonathan Clifton•Journal of Language and Politics•2017

Unique citing works122
Citations per year5,81
Citation span2005 - 2026 (22)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 98

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae