Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Examining how AI capabilities can foster organizational performance in public organizations

Bibliographic Data

ID12080022
AuthorsPatrick Mikalef (0000-0002-6788-2277, SINTEF, corresponding author), Kristina Lemmer (0000-0003-1477-6232, Leuphana University of Lüneburg), Cindy Schaefer (0000-0003-3262-745X, University of Siegen), Maija Ylinen (Tampere University), Siw Olsen Fjørtoft (0000-0002-0781-4010, SINTEF), Hans Torvatn (0000-0002-0996-4805, SINTEF Digital), Hans Yngvar Torvatn, Manjul Gupta (0000-0002-6289-4842, Florida International University), Björn Niehaves (0000-0002-2682-6009, Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen), Bjoern Niehaves
Year2023
Volume40
Issue2
Pages101797-101797
Publication date2023-01-04
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGovernment Information Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0740-624X • E-ISSN: 1872-9517
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.giq.2022.101797
OpenAlexW4313594144
LanguageEN
Citations received26
References cited51

Developing the capacity to digitally transform through AI is becoming increasingly important for public organizations, as a constantly growing number of their activities is now becoming AI-driven. This prompts an understanding of how public organizations should organize in order to derive value from AI, as well as in which forms can value be realized. Against this background, this paper examines how AI capabilities can lead to organizational performance by inducing change in key organizational activities. Using a survey-based study, we collected data from European public organizations regarding the indirect effect AI capabilities have on organizational performance. Data was collected from 168 municipalities from three European countries (Norway, Germany, and Finland) and analyzed by means of structural equation modeling. Our findings show that AI capabilities have a positive effect on process automation, cognitive insight generation, and cognitive engagement. While process automation and cognitive insights are having a positive effect on organizational performance, we found that cognitive engagement negatively affects organizational performance. Our findings document the key resources that constitute an AI capability and showcase the effects of fostering such capabilities on key organizational activities, and in turn organizational performance

Automation · Business · Cognition · Knowledge management · Organizational commitment · Organizational learning · Organizational performance · Organizational studies · Political science · Process (computing · Public relations · Structural equation modeling · Survey data collection · Value (mathematics · Big Data and Business Intelligence · Computer Science · Digital Transformation in Industry · Engineering · Information Technology Governance and Strategy · Psychology

  • Strategic Intelligence

    Open Access•Omar Abdeljaber, Sultan Al-Masaeed et al.•Human Behavior and Emerging…•2025

  • The Adoption of Open Source Software Among Universities in Iraq

    Open Access•Mustafa Moosa Qasim, Ali Raad Abdulkareem et al.•Human Behavior and Emerging…•2025

  • AI street-level bureaucracy

    Jianxiang Tan, Yanto Chandra•International Public Management…•2026

  • AI-enabled workforce

    Wei Zhang, Yili Yu et al.•Public Management Review•2025

  • Serving a greater purpose

    Open Access•Justine Marienfeldt•Public Management Review•2025

  • One capability, many outcomes

    Open Access•Liyun Hu, Zhaopeng Li et al.•Scientometrics•2026

  • Deploying explainable AI in entrepreneurial organizations

    Open Access•Sanjay Chaudhary, Ashraf Khalil et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2025

  • Integrating the circular economy into public organisations

    Open Access•U Awan, Saqib Shamim et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2026

  • Policing in service innovation

    Open Access•Khalizani Khalid, Syed Zamberi Ahmad et al.•The Police Journal Theory…•2026

  • Explore and integrate

    Open Access•Friso Selten•Public Management Review•2026

  • Pathways to sustainable competitive performance

    Open Access•C K John Wang, Qingpu Zhang et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • Harnessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) for enhanced organizational performance in public sectors

    Open Access•Nhon Hoang Thanh, Bac Truong Cong•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • Digital transformation decoupling

    Open Access•Jonathan Crusoe, Johan Magnusson et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2024

  • Automation bias in public administration – an interdisciplinary perspective from law and psychology

    Open Access•Hannah Ruschemeier, Lukas J Hondrich•Government Information Quarterly•2024

  • IT-embedded dynamic capabilities for public institutions coping with disinformation – The case of financial fake news

    Open Access•Oliver Rath, Fabian Haase et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2025

  • AI-augmented government transformation

    Open Access•Luca Tangi, A Paula Rodriguez Müller et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2025

  • Governing Ethics for the Digital Transformation

    Open Access•Emma Pullen, Erna Ruijer et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2026

  • Understanding the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Local Government Decision‐Making

    Open Access•A Paula Rodriguez Müller, Luca Tangi et al.•Public Administration•2025

  • Overcoming e-learning hurdles

    Sampson Agyapong Atuahene, Qian Xusheng•Studies in Higher Education•2024

  • The dynamics of AI capability and its influence on public value creation of AI within public administration

    Open Access•Colin van Noordt, Luca Tangi•Government Information Quarterly•2023

  • Hybrid images of generative AI

    Open Access•Liang Zhu, Tianyi Gao•Government Information Quarterly•2026

  • Whether AI adoption challenges matter for public managers? The case of Polish cities

    Open Access•Katarzyna Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek•Government Information Quarterly•2023

  • Bridging trust in AI and its adoption

    Open Access•Seongkyung Cho, Joon-Young Hur et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2025

  • How does AI awareness enhance the innovative performance of employees

    Open Access•Yaobin Wang, Haopeng Niu et al.•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • Cybersecurity in governing artificial intelligence – the case of Polish cities

    Katarzyna Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek•Journal of Information…•2026

  • Enhancing citizen experience with anthropomorphic chatbots in public services

    Open Access•Lina Shangguan, Shuning Wang et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2025

  • Artificial Intelligence

    Nils J Nilsson•Artificial Intelligence•1998

  • Why PLS-SEM is suitable for complex modelling? An empirical illustration in big data analytics quality

    Shahriar Akter, Samuel Fosso Wamba et al.•Production Planning & Control•2017

  • A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research

    Claudia Binz Astrachan, Vijay K Patel et al.•Journal of Family Business Strategy•2014

  • Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges

    Bernd W Wirtz, Jan C Weyerer et al.•International Journal of Public…•2019

  • PLS path modeling

    Open Access•Michel Tenenhaus, Vincenzo Esposito Vinzi et al.•Computational Statistics & Data…•2005

  • Toward the development of a big data analytics capability

    Open Access•Manjul Gupta, Joey F George•Information & Management•2016

  • A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance

    Anandhi S Bharadwaj, Anandhi Bharadwaj•MIS Quarterly•2000

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI)

    Open Access•Yogesh K Dwivedi, Laurie Hughes et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research1

    Stacie Petter, Detmar Straub et al.•MIS Quarterly•2007

  • Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants.

    Nanda Kumar, Louis W Stern et al.•Academy of Management Journal•1993

  • Validation Guidelines for Is Positivist Research

    Detmar W Straub, Detmar Straub et al.•Communications of the Association…•2004

  • Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research

    Scott B Mackenzie, Mackenzie Mackenzie et al.•MIS Quarterly•2011

  • Interpretation of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research1

    Ronald T Cenfetelli, Geneviève Bassellier•MIS Quarterly•2009

  • Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models

    Martin Wetzels, Odekerken-Schröder Odekerken-Schröder et al.•MIS Quarterly•2009

  • Artificial intelligence capability

    Open Access•Patrick Mikalef, Manjul Gupta•Information & Management•2021

  • Digitalization

    Open Access•Christine Legner, Torsten Eymann et al.•Business & Information Systems…•2017

  • An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research

    Open Access•Joe F Hair, Marko Sarstedt et al.•Journal of the Academy of…•2012

  • PLS-Sem

    Joe F Hair, Christian M Ringle et al.•Journal of Marketing Theory and…•2011

  • Common method biases in behavioral research

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • Using PLS path modeling in new technology research

    Open Access•Jörg Henseler, Geoffrey Hubona et al.•Industrial Management & Data…•2016

  • A new health care system enabled by machine intelligence

    Open Access•Mahmud Akhter Shareef, Vinod Kumar et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Artificial Discretion as a Tool of Governance

    Open Access•Matthew Young, Justin B Bullock et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2019

  • Implementing challenges of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Manu Sharma, Shreya Luthra et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Government Information Networks - Mapping Electronic Governance cases through Public Administration concepts

    Open Access•Tomasz Janowski, Theresa A Pardo et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2011

  • IoT and AI for Smart Government

    Open Access•Atreyi Kankanhalli, Yannis Charalabidis et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector

    Open Access•Tara Qian Sun, Rony Medaglia•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • How does open government data driven co-creation occur? Six factors and a ‘perfect storm’; insights from Chicago's food inspection forecasting model

    Open Access•Keegan Mcbride, Gerli Aavik et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • Citizens' intentions to participate in governmental co-creation initiatives

    Open Access•Menno D T De Jong, Sharon Neulen et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Enabling AI capabilities in government agencies

    Open Access•Patrick Mikalef, Kristina Lemmer et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Artificial intelligence-based public healthcare systems

    Open Access•Omar A Nasseef, Abdullah M Baabdullah et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • The perils and pitfalls of explainable AI

    Open Access•Hans De Bruijn, Martijn Warnier et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Adaptive governance

    Open Access•Marijn Janssen, Haiko Van Der Voort•Government Information Quarterly•2016

  • Design principles for creating digital transparency in government

    Open Access•Ricardo Matheus, Marijn Janssen et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2020

  • Can twitter analytics predict election outcome? An insight from 2017 Punjab assembly elections

    Open Access•Prabhsimran Singh, Yogesh K Dwivedi et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2020

  • Transforming the communication between citizens and government through AI-guided chatbots

    Open Access•Aggeliki Androutsopoulou, Nikos Karacapilidis et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • Community matters

    Sara Douglas, Roxanne B Raine et al.•Information Polity•2015

Citations per year8.67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae