Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Effects of investment in information and communication technologies on productivity of courts in Brazil

Bibliographic Data

ID12080107
AuthorsAndré De Oliveira Gomes (0000-0001-9000-3296, Universidade de Brasília, corresponding author), Adalmir Oliveira Gomes, Simone Tiêssa De Jesus Alves (0000-0001-9686-066X, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros), Simone Tiêssa Alves, Jéssica Traguetto Silva (Universidade de Brasília)
Year2018
Volume35
Issue3
Pages480-490
Publication date2018-06-24
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGovernment Information Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0740-624X • E-ISSN: 1872-9517
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.giq.2018.06.002
OpenAlexW2811327249
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited43

Adjudication · Business · Econometrics · Economic growth · Economic Justice · Economics · Information and Communications Technology · Information technology · Investment (military · Microeconomics · Multilevel model · Panel data · Political science · Politics · Productivity · Public economics · Artificial Intelligence in Law · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Regulation and Compliance Studies

  • Relação entre demanda judicial e força de trabalho nas Justiças Estaduais no Brasil

    Open Access•André De Oliveira Gomes, Adalmir De Oliveira Gomes et al.•Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania•2019

  • Integrating industry 4.0 technologies for the administration of courts and justice dispensation—a systematic review

    Open Access•Hitesh Bhatt, Rajesh Bahuguna et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Overcoming the Productivity Paradox in the Public Sector by Managing Deliberate Learning

    Open Access•Linn Slettum Bjerke-Busch, Sebastian Thorp•Public Management Review•2024

  • Judicial enforcement and caseload

    Open Access•Caio Castelliano, Peter Grajzl et al.•European Journal of Law and…•2021

  • How information technology contributes to justice efficiency

    Open Access•Bruno Mathis, Stéphane Mussard•European Journal of Law and…•2025

  • Judges and court productivity

    Open Access•Ángel L Martín-Román, Alfonso Moral De Blas et al.•European Journal of Law and…•2025

  • E-justice evaluation factors

    Open Access•Yu Jia, Jia Yu et al.•Information Development•2021

  • Fatores que aumentam o tempo do processo judicial no Brasil

    Open Access•Caio Castelliano, Talita Antunes Guimarães et al.•Revista de Administração Pública•2024

  • When autonomy is necessary for performance

    Open Access•Bernardo Oliveira Buta, Marco Antônio C Teixeira et al.•Revista de Administração Pública•2022

  • Quando a autonomia é necessária para o desempenho

    Open Access•Bernardo Oliveira Buta, Marco Antônio C Teixeira et al.•Revista de Administração Pública•2022

  • A relação entre demanda e desempenho dos magistrados

    Open Access•Renan Marçal Manz, Marcos De Moraes Sousa•Revista de Administração Pública•2021

  • Factors increasing case disposition time in Brazil

    Open Access•Caio Castelliano, Talita Antunes Guimarães et al.•Revista de Administração Pública•2024

  • Multidomain judging and administration of justice

    Open Access•Caio Castelliano, Peter Grajzl et al.•International Review of…•2022

  • Digital governance and civic inclusion to enhance public participation in political decision-making processes

    Open Access•Anwar Sadat•Frontiers in Political Science•2025

  • Artificial intelligence and speedy trial in the judiciary

    Open Access•Weslei Gomes de Sousa, Rafael Antunes Fidelis et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Does electronic case-processing enhance court efficacy? New quantitative evidence

    Open Access•Caio Castelliano, Peter Grajzl et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2023

  • Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation.

    Lawrence R James, Jeanne M Brett•Journal of Applied Psychology•1984

  • Organizational structure and ICT strategies in the Brazilian Judiciary System

    Open Access•André Andrade, Luiz Antonio Joia•Government Information Quarterly•2011

  • Risk factors in e-justice information systems

    Open Access•João Rosa, João G Rosa et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2013

  • Information technology and time of judgment in specialized courts

    Open Access•Mario Procopiuck•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • Management Innovation at the Brazilian Superior Tribunal of Justice

    Open Access•Talita Antunes Guimarães, Tomas de Aquino Guimarães et al.•The American Review of Public…•2010

  • The sooner the better management of time in district courts

    Open Access•A J G M Van Montfort, P O de Jong et al.•International Journal of the…•2005

  • Research Note

    Hal G Rainey, Sanjay K Pandey et al.•Public Administration Review•1995

  • The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research

    Reuben M Baron, D A Kenny•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research

    Reuben M Baron, D A Kenny•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • Information Technology and Restructuring in Public Organizations

    Theresa Heintze, Stuart Bretschneider et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2000

  • Judicial Work and Judges’ Motivation

    Open Access•André De Oliveira Gomes, Adalmir Oliveira Gomes et al.•Law & Policy•2016

  • O governo eletrônico no Brasil

    Open Access•Eduardo Henrique Diniz, Alexandre Fernandes Barbosa et al.•Revista de Administração Pública•2009

  • Understanding and Using Mediators and Moderators

    Open Access•Amery D Wu, Bruno D Zumbo•Social Indicators Research•2008

Citations per year2.29
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae