Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

One tool to rule? – A field experimental longitudinal study on the costs and benefits of mobile device usage in public agencies

Bibliographic Data

ID12080870
AuthorsKristina Lemmer (0000-0003-1477-6232, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, corresponding author), Katharina Jahn (0000-0002-9943-5279, Chemnitz University of Technology), Adela Chen (0000-0001-9495-2800, Colorado State University), Björn Niehaves (0000-0002-2682-6009, University of Bremen), Bjoern Niehaves
Year2023
Volume40
Issue3
Pages101836-101836
Publication date2023-05-27
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGovernment Information Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0740-624X • E-ISSN: 1872-9517
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.giq.2023.101836
OpenAlexW4378575655
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited58

With the rising number of mobile technologies used in work- and private-life domains, opportunities, and challenges of mobile device usage in daily lives arise. Against this background, we strive to investigate how corporately provided mobile devices, i.e., tablets, affect work-life conflict and innovation behavior of public sector employees over time. We analyze employees in German public agencies due to their high intrinsic motivation goals alongside strict working schedules, regulations, and payments in contrast to the employees of the private sector. Our research pursues a sequential explorative multi-method approach of conducting a field experiment with qualitative and quantitative data. Twenty employees were divided into two equal groups: 1.) employees with tablets, 2.) employees without tablets. After analyzing the interviews and survey data using methods from grounded theory, we found that a) digital competences can create a bottleneck for employees' innovation behavior, b) corporately provided mobile devices (COPE) decrease employees work-life conflict despite increasing their workload, and c) COPE-IT can support innovation behavior of employees in public agencies, assisting them in keeping up their efficient work when work demands are high. All these effects can be mediated by the development of employee's ownership towards their COPE-IT

Bottleneck · Business · Economics · Grounded theory · Management · Mobile payment · Operations management · Payment · Political science · Private sector · Public relations · Public sector · Qualitative research · Sociology · Work (physics · Workload · E-Government and Public Services · Engineering · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour · Work-Family Balance Challenges · Marketing

  • Digital transformation decoupling

    Open Access•Jonathan Crusoe, Johan Magnusson et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2024

  • Smart Interaction vs. Face-to-Face? Evidence from a Survey Experiment on Perceived Government Responsiveness in China

    Open Access•Huanhuan Li, Limei Gu et al.•Journal of Chinese Political…•2025

  • Research in Organizational Behavior

    Barry M Staw•Research in Organizational Behavior•1992

  • Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations

    Jon L Pierce, Tatiana Kostova et al.•Academy of Management Review•2001

  • Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation

    Open Access•Dennis A Gioia, Kumar Chittipeddi•Strategic Management Journal•1991

  • Using social exchange theory to predict the effects of hrm practice on employee outcomes

    Julian Gould-Williams, Julian Gould‐Williams et al.•Public Management Review•2005

  • Trust, Satisfaction, and Online Repurchase Intention

    Yulin Fang, Israr Qureshi et al.•MIS Quarterly•2014

  • Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research

    Open Access•Dennis A Gioia, Kevin G Corley et al.•Organizational Research Methods•2013

  • Grounded Theory – Strategien qualitativer Forschung

    Barney G Glaser, Barney Glaser et al.•Pflege•2006

  • Creating Balance

    Open Access•T A Beauregard, Max Ringlstetter et al.•Creating Balance?•2011

  • Telecommuting, control, and boundary management

    Open Access•Ellen Ernst Kossek, Brenda A Lautsch et al.•Journal of Vocational Behavior•2005

  • Work–Family Boundary Dynamics

    Tammy D Allen, E Cho et al.•Annual Review of Organizational…•2014

  • Psychological ownership

    Open Access•Sarah Dawkins, Amy Wei Tian et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2017

  • Government 2.0

    Soon Ae Chun, Stuart W Shulman et al.•Information Polity•2010

  • Boundary control and controlled boundaries

    Open Access•Matthew Piszczek•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2016

  • Consequences of work‐home segmentation or integration

    Open Access•Glen E Kreiner•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2006

  • A comparison of the strategic priorities of public and private sector information resource management executives

    Open Access•Mark Ward, Mark A Ward et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2004

  • Innovative policies to support technology and ICT development

    Open Access•Jarunee Wonglimpiyarat•Government Information Quarterly•2014

  • Digital government evolution

    Open Access•Tomasz Janowski•Government Information Quarterly•2015

  • The impact of polices on government social media usage

    Open Access•John Carlo Bertot, Paul T Jaeger et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2011

  • Adaptive governance

    Open Access•Marijn Janssen, Haiko Van Der Voort•Government Information Quarterly•2016

  • Defining digital transformation

    Open Access•Ines Mergel, Noella Edelmann et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • The use of smart work in government

    Open Access•Seok-Jin Eom, Choi Nakbum et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2016

  • Public Versus Private Information Systems

    Open Access•Bruce Rocheleau, Liangfu Wu•The American Review of Public…•2002

  • What’s Valued Most? Similarities and Differences Between the Organizational Values of the Public and Private Sector

    Open Access•Zeger Van Der Wal, G De Graaf et al.•Public Administration•2008

  • Innovation in Strategic Human Resource Management

    Open Access•Ali Farazmand•Public Organization Review•2004

  • Failing forward in Economic and Monetary Union

    Open Access•David Howarth, Lucia Quaglia•Journal of European Public Policy•2021

  • Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research

    John W Creswell, Vicki L Plano Clark•Designing and Conducting Mixed…•2017

  • An Analysis of Differences in Work Motivation between Public and Private Sector Organizations

    Open Access•Marc Buelens, Herman Van Den Broeck•Public Administration Review•2007

  • Comparing Public and Private Organizations

    Hal G Rainey, Robert W Backoff et al.•Public Administration Review•1976

  • Management Information Systems in Public and Private Organizations

    Stuart Bretschneider•Public Administration Review•1990

  • Digital government and wicked problems

    Jing Zhang, Yushim Kim•Information Polity•2016

  • Undisclosed creators of digitalization

    Open Access•Katarina L Gidlund, Leif Sundberg•Information Polity•2021

  • Grounded theory research

    Open Access•Juliet M Corbin, Juliet Corbin et al.•Qualitative Sociology•1990

  • Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction

    Open Access•Noelle Chesley•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2005

Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae