I can see it in your eyes”
Biased Processing and Increased Arousal in Dishonest Responses
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12166253 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Guy Hochman (0000-0001-7486-8265, Social Science Research Institute Duke University Durham NC USA, corresponding author), Andreas Glöckner (0000-0002-7766-4791, Institut für Psychologie University of Hagen Hagen Germany), Susann Fiedler (0000-0001-9337-2142, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods Bonn Germany), Shahar Ayal (0000-0002-7357-1969, Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya Israel) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 322-335 |
| Publication date | 2015-12-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/bdm.1932 |
| OpenAlex | W3123293788 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 21 |
| References cited | 84 |
According to self‐maintenance theory, people notice their dishonest acts and thus experience ethical dissonance between their misconduct and their positive moral self. In this view, dishonesty is facilitated by justifications that redefine moral boundaries. By contrast, the bounded ethicality approach suggests that biased perception prevents people from becoming aware of their dishonesty. We tested the key process assumptions behind these accounts using pupillary responses and fixation data and found physiological evidence for both kinds of mechanisms. In particular, physiological arousal increased at the initial stage of cheating responses. This suggests that people are on some level aware of their wrongdoings. At the same time, however, we found attentional biases that can reduce the likelihood for detecting potentially disadvantageous information. We suggest that dishonest acts come at the internal cost of increased tension, which people aim to avoid by pre‐emptive biased processing as well as post hoc justifications. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Arousal · Cheating · Cognitive dissonance · Cognitive psychology · Dishonesty · Misconduct · Morality · Notice · Perception · Law · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Collective self-justification and resistance to integration
Motivated Cognition in Cooperation
Temptation shapes dishonesty and can alter working memory
Effectiveness of Formal and Informal Controls in Deterring Misreporting
Honest mistake or perhaps not
The Zero Effect
The heterogeneous processes of cheating
Guiding Decision Makers' Eye Movements with (Un)Predictable Object Locations
Card or dice? An improved experimental approach to measure dishonesty
Visual experience in self and social judgment
Resource Constraints Lead to Biased Attention but Decrease Unethical Behavior
A Spillover Effect of Altruistic Cheating
Proud to Be Dishonest
Cheating among children
Applications and Innovations of Eye‐movement Research in Judgment and Decision Making
Do individuals successfully cover up their lies? Evidence from a compliance experiment
Tracing risky decisions for oneself and others
Taking shortcuts
Choosing not to see
Loss framing increases self-serving mistakes (but does not alter attention)
Understanding cognitive and affective mechanisms in social psychology through eye-tracking
Blind Spots
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
White Lies
Honesty Requires Time (and Lack of Justifications)
Justified ethicality
Attention and choice
Goal Setting as a Motivator of Unethical Behavior.
Strategic Information Transmission
Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others
Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression
The Dishonesty of Honest People
How Stories Make Sense of Personal Experiences
Self-Serving Justifications
Washing Away Your Sins
Contagion and Differentiation in Unethical Behavior
Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions
Pupillometry
Do Green Products Make Us Better People?
Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing
Deception
Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference
Bounded Ethicality as a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflicts of Interest
Behavioral Ethics
Sex, Lies and Pharmaceuticals
Loss aversion in the eye and in the heart
An eye‐tracking study on information processing in risky decisions
Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources
Dissonance arousal
The dark side of creativity
See what you want to see
Information-gathering strategies in hypothesis-testing
What lies beneath
The totalitarian ego
Human, all too human
Motivated recruitment of autobiographical memories
Sweeping dishonesty under the rug
Lying in everyday life
The self-importance of moral identity
Physiological arousal, dissonance, and attitude change
Reciprocal relation between attitudes and behavior recall
The case for motivated reasoning
Eye movements in reading and information processing
Self- and interpersonal evaluations
Psychological significance of pupillary movements
| Unique citing works | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,1 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 21 |