Serious Games, Knowledge Acquisition, and Conflict Resolution
The Case of PeaceMaker as a Peace Education Tool
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12170395 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Iolie Nicolaidou (0000-0002-8267-0328, Cyprus University of Technology, Cyprus, corresponding author), Ronit Kampf (0000-0003-2327-2669, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 214-231 |
| Publication date | 2024-04-26 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Science Computer Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0894-4393 • E-ISSN: 1552-8286 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/08944393241249724 |
| OpenAlex | W4395692619 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 29 |
Israeli-Jews and Palestinians cannot easily be exposed to contradicting information about “the other” in the intractable Israeli-Palestinian conflict because of the emotionally charged situation and prevailing ethnocentrism. Serious games like PeaceMaker are used as innovative interventions for peace education. Winning PeaceMaker indicates better conflict resolution skills and developing an informative viewpoint regarding the situation, which is required for conflict resolution and peacebuilding. The evaluation of the effectiveness of prosocial games in educating about conflict and peace in the literature is severely lacking. We examine the effects of this computerized simulation of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict on enhancing knowledge about the conflict and “the other” among undergraduate players who are direct parties (i.e., Israeli-Jews and Palestinians) and third parties (i.e., Americans and Cypriots). In addition, we investigate the knowledge gap between direct parties and third parties who won and did not win the game. Using questionnaires, we conducted a quasi-experimental study with 168 undergraduates using a pre- and post-intervention research design. We found that direct parties to the conflict acquired significantly more knowledge about the other side, and third parties acquired significantly more knowledge about the conflict after playing PeaceMaker. In addition, PeaceMaker minimized the knowledge gap after playing the game among direct parties who won the game and those who did not win and increased the knowledge gap between third parties who won the game and those who did not win. Our results suggest that serious games might be effective interventions for peace education, because they appear to enhance knowledge about the conflict, and about “the other” particularly for young people who are direct parties to this divide
Conflict resolution · Peacebuilding · Political science · Prosocial behavior · Psychological intervention · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Win-win game · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · Law · Peace and Human Rights Education · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
The “contact hypothesis”
Intergroup Contact and Social Change
The effect of games and simulations on higher education
Intergroup contact as a tool for reducing, resolving, and preventing intergroup conflict
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
To learn scientifically, effectively, and enjoyably
Computerized simulation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, knowledge gap, and news media use
The Effects of a Serious Game on Role-Taking and Willingness to Help
Palestinian-Arab Minority in Israel, 1948-2000, The
It's Complicated
What we do and don’t know
Nationalizing States and the Constitution of ‘Hollow Citizenship’
Between Communicative Interaction and Structures of Signification
Learning about dialogue and partnership between rival groups during an intractable conflict
Developing Fact Finders
Learning About the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict Through Computerized Simulations
Mass Media Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge
Intergroup Contact Theory
Does contact work in protracted asymmetrical conflict? Appraising 20 years of reconciliation-aimed encounters between Israeli Jews and Palestinians
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |