Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Against Skills‐based Testing in Science

Bibliographic Data

ID12285396
AuthorsDerek Hodson (a Ontario Institute for Studies in Education , Toronto, Canada, corresponding author)
Year1993
Volume1
Issue1
Pages127-148
Publication date1993-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCurriculum Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0965-9757 • E-ISSN: 1747-5104
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0965975930010108
OpenAlexW1985501445
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited13

In recent years, considerable attention has been focused on the need to develop effective and efficient strategies and procedures for the assessment of students’ laboratory work, on the assumption that only when practical aspects of doing science are rewarded through allocation of marks and grades will teachers give these activities the curriculum priority that many believe they should have. There is no doubt that examinations do exert a significant influence on the curriculum, and can promote or hinder the adoption of particular classroom activities. So, in one sense, the Ontario Ministry of Education's statement in 1987 that assessment of laboratory work should constitute 15% of the final mark in “all Intermediate and Senior Division science courses”, is to be welcomed. So, too, is the growing interest in the assessment of laboratory work in the USA, Australia and New Zealand, and the renewal of interest in the United Kingdom, where such assessment has a long history. Increasingly, however, the emphasis for such assessment seems to be shifting towards a skills‐based approach. In my view, this represents an undesirable trend – one that should be strenuously resisted by teachers. It is my contention that the skills‐based approach is philosophically unsound (because it is not based on a valid model of science), educationally worthless (because it trivialises learning), pedagogically dangerous (because it encourages bad teaching), professionally debasing (because it de‐skills teachers) and socially undesirable (because of powerful hidden messages concerning control and compliance). Instead of skills‐based testing, an approach that recognises the holistic and idiosyncratic nature of scientific inquiry, and affords teachers a more active, decision‐making role, is advocated

Christian ministry · Curriculum · Engineering ethics · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Political science · Statement (logic · Work (physics · Educational Assessment and Pedagogy · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Engineering · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy

  • Science fiction

    Derek Hodson•Curriculum Studies•1998

  • Inclusion without assimilation

    Derek Hodson•Canadian Journal of Science…•2001

  • Clashing Epistemologies of Mathematics Education

    Leone Burton•Curriculum Studies•1994

  • Personal Knowledge

    Michael Polanyi, Mary Jo Nye•Personal Knowledge•2015

  • Cultural and Economic Reproduction in Education

    Michael W Apple•Cultural and Economic Reproduction…•2017

  • Experiments in science and science teaching

    Derek Hodson•Educational Philosophy and Theory•1988

  • Case Studies in Curriculum Administration History

    Richard Aldrich, Henning Haft et al.•British Journal of Educational…•1991

  • Quality in Teaching

    Pauline Perry, William Carr et al.•British Journal of Educational…•1990

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,09
Citation span1994 - 2001 (8)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae