Income, political affiliation, urbanism and geography in stated preferences for electric vehicles (EVs) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technologies in Northern Europe
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12293237 |
|---|---|
| Authors | B K Sovacool (0000-0002-4794-9403, University of Sussex, corresponding author), Johannes Kester (0000-0001-5384-0247, Aarhus University), Lance Noel (0000-0001-9396-2361, Aarhus University), Gerardo Zarazua De Rubens (0000-0002-6698-2516, Aarhus University) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 78 |
| Pages | 214-229 |
| Publication date | 2019-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Transport Geography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0966-6923 • E-ISSN: 1873-1236 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.06.006 |
| OpenAlex | W2954239807 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 18 |
| References cited | 65 |
Despite a potentially revolutionary shift towards electric mobility in the passenger vehicle market, the academic and policymaking communities remain wedded to a techno-economic paradigm that may not fully appreciate deeper social and geographic elements of a transition to electric vehicles. In this paper, based primarily on bivariate statistical analysis as well as a hierarchical regression analysis of a survey distributed to >5000 respondents across Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, we analyze how perceptions and attitudes towards electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid technologies differ by income, political affiliation, and geography. Although our findings confirm EV ownership and mobility patterns in general are related to income—those with higher incomes both own more EVs and drive more generally—they also confirm that interest in EVs is not so strongly related. Lower income groups seem to ask less from their cars, thus potentially opening up a market for cheaper low-range alternates. Political orientation is correlated to car and EV ownership, with those on the “left” more interested yet those on the “right” more able and willing to buy expensive cars. Moreover, we see variation in preferences across urban and rural subcategories, and our findings strongly suggest that EVs need not be promoted only for city or suburban areas. When controlling for variables, a multilevel regression analysis does not change the overall thrust of these associations
Bivariate analysis · Demographic economics · Economic geography · Economics · Electric vehicle · Geography · Multilevel model · Political science · Politics · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Energy and Environment Impacts · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Spatial variabilities in factors affecting electric vehicle adoption across Virginia
The adoption of electric vehicles in public transport services
Electric vehicle adoption intentions among UK residents parking in shared and public spaces
The role of electric vehicle-to-X in net zero energy systems
Norway’s electric vehicle revolution
Towards sustainable e-mobility adoption
Unlocking geographic differences
How to integrate users into smart charging – A critical and systematic review
The partisan politics of low-carbon transport
Why does electric vehicle deployment vary so much within a nation? Comparing Chinese provinces by policy, economics, and socio-demographics
Taking the car out of the countryside
From interest to evangelist
Clear support for an unclear concept? Public attitudes towards local energy systems in the United Kingdom
Plugged in, split apart
The neglected electric vehicle adoption context
Spatial dimensions of electric mobility—Scenarios for efficient and fair diffusion of electric vehicles in the Milan Urban Region
Take a ride on the green side
EVs Are Not the Answer
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Scientists rise up against statistical significance
Moving to a World Beyond “ p < 0.05”
Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization
Residential energy-efficient technology adoption, energy conservation, knowledge, and attitudes
A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan
Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research
A roadmap for rapid decarbonization
Conservative political parties and energy transitions in Europe
The trouble with negative emissions
A long panel survey to elicit variation in preferences and attitudes in the choice of electric vehicles
Understanding the positioning of “the electric vehicle consumer”
Stories of the future
Creating transitions to electric road transport in Norway
Consumer preferences and the influence of networks in electric vehicle diffusion
Ideology, capitalism, and climate
Unpacking sustainabilities in diverse transition contexts
Energy and environmental attitudes in the green state of Denmark
Mobility or mobilities
Social influence in the global diffusion of alternative fuel vehicles – A meta-analysis
Socio-technical transition governance and public opinion
Why live far? — Insights from modeling residential location choice in Bangladesh
Politics eclipses climate extremes for climate change perceptions
The demographics of decarbonizing transport
Modelling social influence and cultural variation in global low-carbon vehicle transitions
It's political
Who emits most? Associations between socio-economic factors and UK households' home energy, transport, indirect and total CO2 emissions
Energy Injustice and Nordic Electric Mobility
Older male and female drivers in car-dependent settings
Whittier Boulevard, Sixth Street Bridge, and the Origins of Transportation Exploitation in East Los Angeles
Strategies for shifting technological systems
Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients
Explaining variance in national electric vehicle policies
Conspicuous diffusion
Freedom as Mobility
If Mobility is Everything Then it is Nothing
Potential Mobilities
Coordination of land-use planning and transportation
The 'System' of Automobility
| Unique citing works | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 18 |