Russia’s quest for respect in the international conflict management in Kosovo
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12302097 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Regina Heller (0000-0002-8999-101X, Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (IFSH), Beim Schlump 83, 20144 Hamburg, Germany, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 333-343 |
| Publication date | 2014-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Communist and Post-Communist Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0967-067X • E-ISSN: 1873-6920 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.09.001 |
| OpenAlex | W2070529022 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 31 |
This article examines the emotion-based status-seeking logic in Russia’s foreign policy vis-à-vis the West, presenting the example of Russia’s reactions to NATO’s military campaign against Serbia in 1999. It is argued that Russian assertiveness in combination with expressive rhetoric must be understood as a result of the ruling elite’s need to have Russia’s identity and self-defined social status as an equal great power in world politics respected by its Western interaction partners. Russia’s reactions to NATO’s intervention, which was not authorized by the UN Security Council, must be read as a strategy coping with the emotion anger about the perceived humiliation and provocation of status denial and ignorance by the West. We find various elements of such a coping strategy, among them the verbalization of the feeling of anger among Russian political circles and the media; uttering retaliation threats, but no ‘real’ aggressive, retaliatory action; minor and temporary activities aimed at restoring Russia’s image and status as an influential an equal power. On the surface, the Kosovo episode did not result in any visible break or rift in the RussianeWestern relationship. However, emotionally it has lead to a significant loss of trust in the respective partner on both sides
Anger · Denial · Elite · Foreign policy · Humiliation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Lost in Translation
Tracing the development of Kosovar and Albanian identities using urban toponyms
Russia’s Power Politics in Ukraine and Syria
Important, not impotent
The Psychological Dimension of Russian Foreign Policy
Great power identity in Russia’s position on autonomous weapons systems
Putin’s Arctic Strategy
Conflict as imbalance
From status inconsistency to revisionism
Between Deference and Defiance
Taking interaction seriously
How to challenge an international order
A Social interactional theory of emotions
Political Psychology in International Relations
Theorizing States’ Emotions1
The emotional dog and its rational tail
Major Powers and the Quest for Status in International Politics
Sprache und Emotion
Sozialwissenschaftliche Hermeneutik
Russia's Post-Imperial Condition
Emotions in Social Life
Respect and disrespect in international politics
Prestige in world politics
Russia's Identity
Examining Emotions in Identity Theory
Status Seekers
The moral emotions
Studies on anger and aggression
Theory of international politics
Taking Preferences Seriously
A Cause in Search of Its Effect, or What Does Political Culture Explain
Intergroup emotions
Fear, anger, and risk
Upheavals of Thought
Fear no more
Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation
Illusion and well-being
Russia as a 'great power' in world affairs
What are emotions? And how can they be measured
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1.2 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2024 (9) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |