Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Influence of supplier trust and relationship commitment on green supplier integration

Bibliographic Data

ID12307145
AuthorsGang Wang (0000-0002-2288-3807, School of Business Administration Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics Hohhot China), Taiwen Feng (0000-0002-1620-7431, School of Economics and Management Harbin Institute of Technology (Weihai) Weihai China), Xuesong Zhao (0000-0002-7698-8495, School of Management Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an China), Yongtao Song (0000-0002-2709-0742, Institute of Management Science and Engineering Henan University Kaifeng China, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume26
Issue6
Pages879-889
Publication date2018-06-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSustainable Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0968-0802 • E-ISSN: 1099-1719
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/sd.1857
OpenAlexW2805218981
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited46

Although the importance of green supplier integration has been recognized, our knowledge on what influences green supplier integration remains limited. Based on transaction cost theory and social exchange theory, this article develops hypotheses regarding the impacts of supplier trust and relationship commitment on green supplier integration, and the moderating effect of monitoring difficulty. We conduct hierarchical regression analyses to test these hypothesized relationships using survey data collected from 187 Chinese firms. The results reveal that supplier trust is positively related to normative commitment and instrumental commitment. Furthermore, normative commitment and instrumental commitment are positively related to green supplier integration, and partially mediate the relationship between supplier trust and green supplier integration. The results also indicate that monitoring difficulty negatively moderates the relationship between supplier trust and instrumental commitment, but does not significantly moderate the relationship between supplier trust and normative commitment. This study contributes to theory and practice by opening the “black box” of the trust–integration link

Business · Multilevel model · Normative · Supplier relationship management · Supply chain · Supply chain management · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Psychology · Quality and Supply Management · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Marketing

  • Curbing relationship conflict for achieving green customer integration

    Open Access•Jieyu Wang, Taiwen Feng•International Journal of Conflict…•2024

  • Sustainable supply chain finance adoption and firm performance

    Open Access•Xiaoli Guo, Weili Xia et al.•Sustainable Development•2022

  • Embracing green innovation via green supply chain learning

    Open Access•Wei Lisi, Rui Zhu et al.•Sustainable Development•2019

  • Sustainable development across the supply chain

    Open Access•Asif Muzaffar, Aitzaz Khurshid et al.•Sustainable Development•2019

  • How to convert green supply chain integration efforts into green innovation

    Open Access•Ting Kong, Taiwen Feng et al.•Sustainable Development•2020

  • Evaluating the Synergy Between Lean Practices and Sustainability in Supply Chains

    Open Access•Luís Fonseca, José Carlos Sá et al.•Sustainable Development•2025

  • How environmental orientation influences firm performance

    Open Access•Cong Zhou, Weili Xia et al.•Sustainable Development•2019

  • Achieving the environmental profits of green supplier integration

    Open Access•Lei Ji, Chunlin Yuan et al.•Sustainable Development•2020

  • Impact of green manufacturing on consumer ecological behavior

    Open Access•Abdul Waheed, Qingyu Zhang et al.•Sustainable Development•2020

  • Efficiency of lean practices and blockchain combinations for green supplier integration improvements in sustainable development

    Open Access•Ping-Kuo Chen•Sustainable Development•2022

  • Environmental management and manufacturing performance

    Open Access•Stephan Vachon, Robert D Klassen•International Journal of…•2008

  • Common method biases in behavioral research

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Open Access•Claes Fornell, David F Larcker•Journal of Marketing Research•1981

  • Drivers and Barriers to Energy Efficiency Management for Sustainable Development

    Open Access•Ki‐Hoon Lee, Ki-Hoon Lee•Sustainable Development•2014

  • Supporting Smallholders to Access Sustainable Supply Chains

    Open Access•Laia Fayet, Walter J V Vermeulen•Sustainable Development•2012

  • Towards green loyalty

    Open Access•Yu‐Shan Chen•Sustainable Development•2010

  • The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research

    Reuben M Baron, D A Kenny•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research

    Reuben M Baron, D A Kenny•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • Exchange and power in social life

    Peter Michael Blau•Exchange and power in social life•1986

  • How Green Management Influences Product Innovation in China

    Open Access•Chang Shu, Chengli Shu et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2014

Unique citing works10
Citations per year1,43
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae