Conducting a Distance Education Course When You Are the Distant One
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12379740 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steven D Roper (0000-0002-2166-9323, Eastern Illinois University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 477-479 |
| Publication date | 2004-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1049096504004718 |
| OpenAlex | W2170850900 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
There has been a great deal of discussion in PS: Political Science & Politics concerning the development, use, and evaluation of distance education courses delivered via the Internet (Young 1998; Botsch and Botsch 2001; Pollock and Wilson 2002). While the literature in this new area of teaching instruction varies in terms of its focus and recommendations, one common assumption is that the delivery of the distance education course is accomplished while the faculty member is on campus. For example, Young (1998) does an excellent job of describing how university resources can be utilized in the gradual process of incorporating technology to develop a “cyberclass.” The analysis of Botsch and Botsch (2001) concerning outcomes in online and traditional courses was based on online courses offered during the regular semester as part of the normal teaching load
Course (navigation · Distance education · Focus (optics · Mathematics education · Online course · Political science · Politics · Pollock · Process (computing · Sociology · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Engineering · History · Online and Blended Learning · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2008 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |