Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Gendered Policy Leadership in the Judicial Branch

Bibliographic Data

ID12419953
AuthorsRichard L Vining (0000-0001-5769-6289, University of Georgia), Teena Wilhelm (0000-0002-8719-8851, University of Georgia), Levi Hudson (University of Georgia)
Year2025
Publication date2025-09-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Research Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/10659129251368774
OpenAlexW4414312324
LanguageEN
References cited57

In most states, the chief justice is tasked with leading the judiciary and working within the political environment to address its shortcomings. This requires public advocacy that emphasizes the needs of the justice system and appropriate reforms. Given the increase of gender diversity among judicial leaders in the American states in recent decades, the extent to which male and female chief justices approach these duties differently is an important but unknown consideration. In this research, we consider the extent that female chief justices exhibit gendered policy leadership in their public rhetoric. We find that female chiefs devote more attention to women’s issues in their advocacy efforts, suggesting that the gender diversity among modern chief justices has a meaningful impact on agendas for reform of the justice system

Gender Politics and Representation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Legal Education and Practice Innovations

  • Women, Power and Political Systems

    Margherita Rendel•Women, Power and Political Systems•2018

  • Representing Women

    Beth Reingold•Representing Women•2000

  • How Women Represent Women

    Tracy Osborn, Tracy L Osborn•How women represent women•2012

  • The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Harold J Spaeth•Supreme Court and the Attitudinal…•2002

  • Steadfast Democrats

    Open Access•Ismail K White, Chryl N Laird•Steadfast Democrats - How Social…•2020

  • The Role of Emotional Language in Briefs before the US Supreme Court

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Matthew E K Hall et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2016

  • Determinants of Writing Style on the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Jeffrey Budziak, Matthew P Hitt et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • She’ll Settle It

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd•Journal of Law and Courts•2013

  • Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the U.S. States

    Open Access•William D Berry, Richard C Fording et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2010

  • Gender, Race, and Dissensus on State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•John Szmer, Robert K Christensen et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2015

  • Judges' Race and Judicial Decision Making

    Open Access•Darrell Steffensmeier, Chester L Britt et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2001

  • Gender and Justice

    Open Access•Susan Gluck Mezey•Political Science Quarterly•2013

  • Justices and Legal Clarity

    Open Access•Ryan J Owens, Justin Wedeking et al.•Law & Society Review•2011

  • Beyond Consensus

    Mikel Norris•Women & Politics•2022

  • Women Rule

    Mikel Norris, Holley Tankersley•Women & Politics•2018

  • A view from the top

    Thomas Little, Thomas D C Little et al.•Women & Politics•2001

  • Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges

    Paul Brace, Laura Langer et al.•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • A Reappraisal of Diversification in the Federal Courts

    Donald R Songer, Sue Davis et al.•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • Political Constraints on Legal Doctrine

    Jeffrey R Lax•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Judicial Reform in the American States

    Open Access•Teena Wilhelm, Richard L Vining et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2020

  • Chief Justice Selection Rules and Judicial Ideology

    Open Access•Teena Wilhelm, Richard L Vining et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2023

  • In the Interest of Millennials? Exploring Generational Representation in US State Legislatures

    Open Access•Stella M Rouse, Charles R Hunt et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2025

  • Updating Pajid Scores for State Supreme Court Justices (1970–2019)

    Open Access•David A Hughes, Teena Wilhelm et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2023

  • Gender Differences in Policy Preferences

    Robert Y Shapiro, Harpreet Mahajan•Public Opinion Quarterly•1986

  • The Politics of Court Budgeting in the States

    Open Access•James W Douglas, Roger E Hartley•Public Administration Review•2003

  • Diversity in Judicial Leadership in the American States

    Teena Wilhelm, Richard L Vining et al.•Polity•2024

  • Women and Representation

    Open Access•Jessica C Gerrity, Tracy Osborn et al.•Politics & Gender•2007

  • Quasi-Experimental Design, Constituency, and Advancing Women’s Interests

    Open Access•Jason A Macdonald, Erin E O'Brien et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators’ Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Sarah Poggione•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • Representation on the Courts? The Effects of Trial Judges’ Sex and Race

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • The Influence of Precedent on State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Benjamin Kassow, Benjamin J Kassow et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2012

  • The Social Causes and Political Consequences of Group Empathy

    Open Access•Cigdem V Sirin, Nicholas A Valentino et al.•Political Psychology•2017

  • Connecting Descriptive and Substantive Representation

    Open Access•Michele L Swers•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges

    Open Access•Paul Brace, Brent D Boyea•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Lee Epstein et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Case Visibility and the Electoral Connection in State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Damon M Cann, Damon Cann et al.•American Politics Research•2011

  • The Impact of Judicial Selection Method on State Supreme Court Justice Ideology

    Open Access•Nicholas W Waterbury, Alan J Simmons•American Politics Research•2025

  • Hispanic Public Opinion and Partisanship in America

    Open Access•M Abrajano, Marisa A Abrajano et al.•Political Science Quarterly•2011

  • The (Dis)Advantage of Certainty

    Open Access•Pamela C Corley, Justin Wedeking•Law & Society Review•2014

  • Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions

    Open Access•Brandice Canes-Wrone, Tom S Clark et al.•American Political Science Review•2014

  • The Impact of Gender on Activities and Priorities of State Legislators

    Sue Thomas, Susan Welch•The Western Political Quarterly•1991

  • Women and Men Policymakers

    Darrell Steffensmeier, Chris Hebert•Social Forces•1999

  • The Psychological Meaning of Words

    Open Access•Yla R Tausczik, Yla Tausczik et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2010

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae