Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges

Bibliographic Data

ID6231950
AuthorsPaul Brace (Rice University), Brent D Boyea (0000-0003-4904-4795, The University of Texas at Arlington)
Year2008
Volume52
Issue2
Pages360-372
Publication date2008-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00317.x
OpenAlexW2153655895
LanguageEN
Citations received111
References cited39

Do state supreme courts act impartially or are they swayed by public opinion? Do judicial elections influence judge behavior? To date these questions have received little direct attention due to the absence of comparable public opinion data in states and obstacles to collecting data necessary for comprehensive analysis of state supreme court outcomes. Advances in measurement, data archiving, and methodology now allow for consideration of the link between public opinion and judicial outcomes in the American states. The analysis presented considers public opinion's influence on the composition of courts (indirect effects) and its influence on judge votes in capital punishment cases (direct effects). In elective state supreme courts, public support for capital punishment influences the ideological composition of those courts and judge willingness to uphold death sentences. Notably, public support for capital punishment has no measurable effect on nonelective state supreme courts. On the highly salient issue of the death penalty, mass opinion and the institution of electing judges systematically influence court composition and judge behavior

Capital punishment · Certiorari · Concurring opinion · Ideology · Judicial opinion · Majority opinion · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Punishment (psychology · State (computer science · State supreme court · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Judicial Independence

    Open Access•Michael J Nelson•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • On the Social Foundations for Crimmigration

    Open Access•Justin T Pickett•Journal of Quantitative Criminology•2016

  • The Punitiveness of the Mass Public

    Open Access•Kevin J Mullinix, Nathan Brophy et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2026

  • Between law and conscience

    Open Access•Mane Kara-Yakoubian, Jonathan A Fugelsang et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2026

  • Exploring Causality between Public Opinion and the Death Penalty Using Granger Testing

    Open Access•Kennedy Tatro, Jeffrey R Oliver•Advances in Applied Sociology•2023

  • The Evolution of State Courts Research in the Twenty-First Century

    Open Access•Brent D Boyea, David A Hughes et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2026

  • Chinese criminal justice practitioners’ death penalty opinion and justifications

    Open Access•Bin Liang, Jianhong Liu et al.•Crime Law and Social Change•2026

  • Post-Conviction Review on Trial

    Open Access•Heather L Scheuerman, Elizabeth Griffiths et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2023

  • Justice in America

    Open Access•Mark Peffley, Jon Hurwitz•Justice in America•2010

  • Who Lives and Dies on Death Row? Race, Ethnicity, and Post-Sentence Outcomes in Texas

    Michelle Petrie, Michelle A Petrie et al.•Social Problems•2010

  • Immigration and Preferences for Greater Law Enforcement Spending in Rich Democracies

    Open Access•Joshua J Fink, Joshua Fink et al.•Social Forces•2019

  • Racial Resentment and the Death Penalty

    Open Access•F R Baumgartner, Christian Caron et al.•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2023

  • The globalization of childhood

    Open Access•Robyn Linde•European Journal of International…•2014

  • On the Politics of Imprisonments

    Open Access•David R Jacobs, David Jacobs et al.•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2010

  • Judicial Review as a Limit on Government Domination

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall•Perspectives on Politics•2016

  • Public Opinion and Criminal Justice Policy

    Justin T Pickett•Annual Review of Criminology•2018

  • Does Judicial Selection Affect Judicial Performance? Evidence from a Natural Experiment

    Open Access•Mona Vakilifathi, Thad Kousser•The Forum•2020

  • Does Local Journalism Stimulate Voter Participation in State Supreme Court Elections

    Open Access•David A Hughes•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Judicial Selection and Criminal Punishment

    Open Access•Travis N Taylor•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • Responsive Justice

    Open Access•Michael J Nelson•Journal of Law and Courts•2014

  • The Electoral Connection in Court

    Open Access•Joshua Boston, Bernardo Silveira•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • Contextualizing the “Black Box”

    Open Access•Tao L Dumas•Journal of Law and Courts•2016

  • On Courts and Pocketbooks

    Open Access•Deborah Rice•Journal of Law and Courts•2014

  • Strategic Retirement in Comparative Perspective

    Open Access•Aníbal Pérez-Liñán, Ignacio Arana Araya•Journal of Law and Courts•2017

  • Explaining Indigenous Peoples’ Success in State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Rebecca A Reid, Todd A Curry•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Does Merit Selection Work

    Open Access•Greg Goelzhauser•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Facing the Public

    Open Access•Kayla S Canelo, Brent D Boyea et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • We are a part of the problem they protest”

    Michael Catalano, Todd A Curry et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2024

  • How Does Race Moderate the Effect of Religion Dimensions on Attitudes toward the Death Penalty

    Open Access•Soheil Sabriseilabi, James L Williams et al.•Societies•2022

  • Counterbalancing the disadvantages of the “Have Nots”

    Open Access•Bianca Easterly•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2019

  • The use of surveys in interest group research

    Open Access•Kathleen Marchetti•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2015

  • May it please the twitterverse

    Todd A Curry, Michael P Fix•Journal of Information Technology…•2019

  • The association of gender role attitudes and offense type with public punitiveness toward male and female offenders

    Open Access•Ayşe Esra Tuncer, Nick J Broers et al.•International journal of law,…•2018

  • An interreality study of race and homicide news coverage in Baton Rouge, Louisiana

    Open Access•Tim V Klein, Quincy Hodges•Crime Media Culture An…•2022

  • Impact of Judicial Elections on Judicial Decisions

    Herbert M Kritzer•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2016

  • Does the death penalty save lives

    Open Access•Tomislav V Kovandzic, Lynne M Vieraitis et al.•Criminology & Public Policy•2009

  • The Punitive Public? Exploring the Opinion-Election Connection in Criminal Justice Policy

    Open Access•Arvind Krishnamurthy, Curtis Bram et al.•American Politics Research•2025

  • The Role of Constitutional Features in Judicial Review

    Open Access•Adam R Brown•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2018

  • Public Opinion in the U.S. States

    Open Access•Peter K Enns, Julianna Koch•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2013

  • Judging Judicial Review in the American States

    Open Access•Charles Crabtree, Michael J Nelson•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2019

  • Hell to pay

    Open Access•J O Baker, Alexis L Booth•Punishment & Society•2016

  • Decision Making in the Hidden Judiciary

    William D Schreckhise, Daniel E Chand et al.•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2018

  • Gendered Policy Leadership in the Judicial Branch

    Open Access•Richard L Vining, Teena Wilhelm et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Among the Bodies of Our Children

    Open Access•Hope Martinez, H Salvador Martínez•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Jobs and Punishment

    Open Access•Simon St-Georges, Vincent Arel-Bundock et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Judicial Institutions, Independence, and the Separation of Powers

    Open Access•Teena Wilhelm, David A Hughes•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Appointed or Elected

    Open Access•Herbert M Kritzer•Law & Social Inquiry•2022

  • An Experimental Investigation of How Judicial Elections Affect Public Faith in the Judicial System

    Open Access•Anthony J Nownes, Colin Glennon•Law & Social Inquiry•2015

  • Supreme Court Elections

    Open Access•Lawrence Baum•Law & Social Inquiry•2017

  • Explaining High-Profile Coverage of State Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Richard L Vining, Teena Wilhelm•Social Science Quarterly•2010

  • Policy Venues and Policy Change

    Open Access•Damon Cann, Teena Wilhelm•Social Science Quarterly•2011

  • Does Seniority Matter? The Conditional Influence of State Methods of Judicial Retention

    Open Access•Brent D Boyea•Social Science Quarterly•2010

  • Evaluating diffuse support for state high courts among individuals with varying levels of policy agreement

    Open Access•Damon Cann, Jeff Yates•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • Rigid rules and slippery standards

    Open Access•Matthew Montgomery, Michael P Fix et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • Effects of selection regimes on state supreme court opinion writing

    Open Access•Marcy Shieh•Social Science Quarterly•2023

  • Unmasking the American death penalty debate

    Open Access•Mark D Ramirez•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • Turning to the Courts

    Melinda D Kane, Thomas Elliott et al.•Sociological Focus•2014

  • The Pragmatic American

    Open Access•Justin T Pickett, Thomas Baker•Criminology•2014

  • Vulnerable Victims, Monstrous Offenders, and Unmanageable Risk

    Open Access•Justin T Pickett, Christina Mancini et al.•Criminology•2013

  • Holding Justice Accountable

    Open Access•Dvir Yogev•Public Opinion Quarterly•2025

  • The Incumbency Advantage in Judicial Elections

    Open Access•Michael P Olson, Andrew Stones et al.•Political Behavior•2022

  • Elections Improve Support for State Trial Court Judges in the United States

    Open Access•Andrew Stones, Michael P Olson•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • So Many Open Doors

    Mary Walsh, Mary Barbara Walsh et al.•Women & Politics•2016

  • Gender Diversity, Women’s Leadership, and Consensus in State Supreme Courts

    Meghan E Leonard, Joseph V Ro•Women & Politics•2020

  • Strategic Retirements of Elected and Appointed Justices

    Todd A Curry, Mark S Hurwitz•The Journal of Politics•2016

  • Incentive Effects of Recall Elections

    Sanford C Gordon, Sidak Yntiso•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • Stare Decisisand the Electoral Connection

    Open Access•Marilyn G Miller, Michael G Miller et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2020

  • How Courts Structure State-Level Representation

    Open Access•Jonathan P Kastellec•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2018

  • Judicial Reform in the American States

    Open Access•Teena Wilhelm, Richard L Vining et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2020

  • Consensus and Cooperation on State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Meghan E Leonard, Joseph V Ro•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2014

  • New Data on State Supreme Court Cases

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall, Jason Harold Windett•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2013

  • New Data on Court Curbing by State Legislatures

    Open Access•Meghan E Leonard•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2022

  • The Influence of Legislative Reappointment on State Supreme Court Decision-Making

    Open Access•Thomas Gray•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2017

  • Classifying Judicial Selection Institutions

    Open Access•Greg Goelzhauser•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2018

  • Individual Contributions to State Supreme Court Campaigns

    Open Access•Brent D Boyea•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2017

  • A Market-Based Model of State Supreme Court News

    Open Access•Richard L Vining, Teena Wilhelm et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2015

  • Judicial Independence and Opinion Clarity on State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Greg Goelzhauser, Damon M Cann et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2014

  • Judicial Deference and Executive Control Over Administrative Agencies

    Open Access•Gbemende Johnson•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2014

  • Public Opinion and Judicial Behavior in Direct Democracy Systems

    Open Access•Daniel C Lewis, Frederick S Wood et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2014

  • Democratic Backsliding in the American States

    Open Access•Meghan E Leonard•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2024

  • Public Opinion and American Democracy

    Robert Y Shapiro•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • Measuring Case Salience in State Courts of Last Resort

    Open Access•Richard L Vining, Teena Wilhelm•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Assessing the Impact of State Judicial Structures on Citizen Litigiousness

    Open Access•Jeff Yates, Holley Tankersley et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Conditions for Competition in Low-Information Judicial Elections

    Open Access•Matthew J Streb, Brian Frederick•Political Research Quarterly•2009

  • Informational Need, Institutional Capacity, and Court Receptivity

    Open Access•Jenna Becker Kane•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Representation in State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Melinda Gann Hall•Political Research Quarterly•2014

  • Executive Power and Judicial Deference

    Open Access•Gbemende Johnson•Political Research Quarterly•2015

  • Judicial Merit Selection

    Open Access•Nancy Arrington•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Out‐party, out of luck

    Open Access•Pedro C Magalhães, Luís De Sousa et al.•Political Psychology•2025

  • Judicial Institutions and the Political Economy of Retirements

    Open Access•David A Hughes•Political Behavior•2021

  • Theorizing the Submerged State

    Open Access•Ursula Hackett•Policy Studies Journal•2017

  • Lingering Debates and Innovative Advances

    Open Access•Kevin J Mullinix•Policy Studies Journal•2011

  • Two Sides of the Same Coin? Congruence and Responsiveness as Representative Democracy's Currencies

    Open Access•Daniela Beyer, Miriam Hänni•Policy Studies Journal•2018

  • Why do lawmakers seek to sanction state courts

    Jonathan S Hack•Journal of Legislative Studies•2022

  • And Justice for Some

    Open Access•Jon Hurwitz, Mark Peffley•Canadian Journal of Political…•2010

  • The Public's Increasing Punitiveness and Its Influence on Mass Incarceration in the United States

    Open Access•Peter K Enns•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Selection Method, Partisanship, and the Administration of Elections

    Open Access•Barry Burden, David T Canon et al.•American Politics Research•2013

  • How Supreme Court Justices Supervise Ideologically Distant States

    Open Access•Amanda Clare Bryan, Ryan J Owens•American Politics Research•2017

  • Discouraging Dissent

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall, Jason Harold Windett•American Politics Research•2016

  • Case Visibility and the Electoral Connection in State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Damon M Cann, Damon Cann et al.•American Politics Research•2011

  • Democracy in America

    Alexis De Tocqueville, Alexis Charles Henri Maurice Clérel De Tocqueville et al.•The Two Narratives of Political…•2010

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • The Population Ecology of Interest Representation

    Virginia Gray, David Lowery•The population ecology of…•1996

  • The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior

    Lawrence Baum•The puzzle of judicial behavior•1997

  • The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy

    Open Access•Paul Burstein•Political Research Quarterly•2003

  • Hardening of the Attitudes

    Open Access•Phoebe C Ellsworth, Samuel R Gross•Journal of Social Issues•1994

  • Explaining Spatial Variation in Support for Capital Punishment

    Eric P Baumer, F Messner et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2003

  • The Influence of Values on Consensus and Contentious Morality Policy

    Christopher Z Mooney, Mei-Hsien Lee et al.•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • Professionalization as a Policy Choice

    Open Access•David L Kirp•World Politics•1982

  • The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited

    Kevin T Mcguire, James A Stimson•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Why Do White Americans Support the Death Penalty

    Joe So, Joe Soss et al.•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Recruitment of Chief Justices on State Supreme Courts

    Laura Langer, Jody Mcmullen et al.•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Beyond the Demand-Input Model

    Patricia A Hurley, Kim Quaile Hill et al.•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Expanding the Integrated Model of Judicial Decision Making

    Carol Ann Traut, Craig F Emmert•The Journal of Politics•1998

  • Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges

    Paul Brace, Laura Langer et al.•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice

    Paul Brace, Paul R Brace et al.•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts

    Melinda Gann Hall•The Journal of Politics•1987

  • The Multi-Layered Impact of Public Opinion on Capital Punishment Implementation in the American States

    Open Access•Barbara Norrander•Political Research Quarterly•2000

  • Does State Political Ideology Change over Time

    Open Access•Paul Brace, Kevin Arceneaux et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • Comparing GEE and Robust Standard Errors for Conditionally Dependent Data

    Open Access•Christopher Zorn•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • Understanding Interaction Models

    Open Access•Thomas Brambor, William R Clark et al.•Political Analysis•2006

  • Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93

    William D Berry, Evan J Ringquist et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • The Hierarchy of Justice

    Donald R Songer, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • Public Opinion in the American States

    Paul Brace, Kellie Sims-Butler et al.•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Accountability and Coercion

    Open Access•Gregory A Huber, Sanford C Gordon•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • Does Quality Matter? Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections

    Open Access•Melinda Gann Hall, Chris W Bonneau•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Legislative Agendas and Interest Advocacy

    Open Access•Virginia Gray, David Lowery et al.•American Politics Research•2005

  • Constituency Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Warren E Miller, Donald E Stokes et al.•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Challenges to the Impartiality of State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•James L Gibson•American Political Science Review•2008

  • Pluralism, Federalism and the Protection of Civil Liberties

    Open Access•James L Gibson•The Western Political Quarterly•1990

  • The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•William Mishler, Reginald S Sheehan•American Political Science Review•1993

  • Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Helmut Norpoth, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Political Science Review•1994

  • State Supreme Courts in American Democracy

    Open Access•Melinda Gann Hall•American Political Science Review•2001

Unique citing works111
Citations per year6,17
Citation span2008 - 2026 (19)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 111

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae