Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Elections Improve Support for State Trial Court Judges in the United States

Bibliographic Data

ID6436399
AuthorsAndrew Stones (0000-0003-4683-8119, University of Mississippi, University), Michael P Olson (0000-0002-8023-1815, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis)
Year2025
Volume13
Issue2
Pages440-462
Publication date2025-01-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Law and Courts (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2164-6589 • E-ISSN: 2164-6570
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/jlc.2024.14
OpenAlexW4406246374
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited49

Do constituents care how judges are chosen? We conduct two nationally representative survey experiments focusing on state trial courts. Our first study indicates that respondents prefer judges who are elected to those who are appointed, though this does not affect their perceptions of the judiciary’s legitimacy. Our second study explores three potential mechanisms: efficacy, experience with democracy, and perceived ideological proximity. We find evidence that real-world experience with judicial elections is associated with a preference for such elections, but we do not find evidence for other mechanisms. Our study offers important new evidence for assessing proposed reforms to judicial selection

Algorithm · Political science · State (computer science · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Psychology

  • Democratizing U.S. Courts

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, John M Bruce•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Institutional Structures and Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Michael J Nelson, James L Gibson•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Stealth Democracy

    Open Access•John R Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse et al.•Stealth Democracy•2002

  • In Defense of Judicial Elections

    Chris W Bonneau, Melinda Gann Hall•In defense of judicial elections•2009

  • A field experiment on community policing and police legitimacy

    Open Access•Kyle Peyton, Michael Sierra-Arévalo et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2019

  • Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior

    Open Access•Jens Hainmueller, Dominik Hangartner et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2015

  • Losers' Consent

    Christopher Anderson, Christopher J Anderson et al.•Losers' consent•2005

  • Demographic Disparities Using Ranked-Choice Voting? Ranking Difficulty, Under-Voting, and the 2020 Democratic Primary

    Open Access•Joseph A Coll•Politics and Governance•2021

  • Is the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Vulnerable to Intense Appointment Politics? Democrats’ Changed Views Around Justice Ginsburg’s Death

    Open Access•Douglas Glick, David M Glick•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Incumbent Behavior

    Sanford C Gordon, Gregory A Huber•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2007

  • The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Michael J Nelson•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2014

  • Mind the Gap! Populism, Participation and Representation in Europe

    Open Access•Robert A Huber, Saskia P Ruth et al.•Swiss Political Science Review•2017

  • Public Views of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Aftermath of the Kavanaugh Confirmation

    Open Access•Christopher N Krewson, Christopher Krewson et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2020

  • One Bad Apple Spoils the Bunch

    Open Access•Nathan Carrington, Colin French•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • The Incumbency Advantage in Judicial Elections

    Open Access•Michael P Olson, Andrew Stones et al.•Political Behavior•2022

  • New-Style” Judicial Campaigns and the Legitimacy of State High Courts

    James L Gibson•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Delegation and Accountability

    Justin Fox, Stuart V Jordan•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Presidential Approval and Legislative Success

    Brandice Canes-Wrone, Scott De Marchi•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • Campaign Spending, Diminishing Marginal Returns, and Campaign Finance Restrictions in Judicial Elections

    Chris W Bonneau, Damon M Cann et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • The Two Opposing Effects of Judicial Elections on Legitimacy Perceptions

    Open Access•Benjamin Woodson•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2017

  • The Supreme Court as an electoral issue

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Elizabeth N Simas et al.•Political Science Research and…•2022

  • Descriptive representation and public support for Supreme Court nominees

    Open Access•Jaclyn Kaslovsky, Jon C Rogowski et al.•Political Science Research and…•2021

  • Conditions for Competition in Low-Information Judicial Elections

    Open Access•Matthew J Streb, Brian Frederick•Political Research Quarterly•2009

  • Someone like Me

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Katelyn E Stauffer•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations

    Open Access•Malcolm Sen, Maya Sen•Political Research Quarterly•2017

  • Predicting Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections

    Open Access•Chris W Bonneau, Melinda Gann Hall•Political Research Quarterly•2003

  • Words Speak Louder than Actions

    Open Access•Jon C Rogowski, Andrew Stones et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice

    Open Access•Jens Hainmueller, Jonathan Mummolo et al.•Political Analysis•2019

  • Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis

    Open Access•Jens Hainmueller, D J Hopkins et al.•Political Analysis•2014

  • The effect of primaries on voter evaluations of candidate quality

    Open Access•Jana Schwenk•Party Politics•2024

  • Job Approval and Senate Election Outcomes In the United States

    Open Access•Benjamin Highton•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Concordance and Projection in Citizen Perceptions of Congressional Roll-Call Voting

    Open Access•J Matthew Wilson, Paul Gronke•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2000

  • Organizing consent

    Open Access•Marcia Grimes•European Journal of Political…•2006

  • State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges

    Open Access•Paul Brace, Brent D Boyea•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • What Do We Learn about Voter Preferences from Conjoint Experiments

    Open Access•Scott F Abramson, Korhan Kocak et al.•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • Congressional Representation

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Shiro Kuriwaki•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • Accountability and Coercion

    Open Access•Gregory A Huber, Sanford C Gordon•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • Does Quality Matter? Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections

    Open Access•Melinda Gann Hall, Chris W Bonneau•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • How Political Contestation Over Judicial Nominations Polarizes Americans’ Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Jon C Rogowski, Andrew Stones et al.•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Homegrown Institutional Legitimacy

    Open Access•Damon M Cann, Damon Cann et al.•American Politics Research•2008

  • Politicized Battles

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, Elizabeth A Lane•American Politics Research•2023

  • Does Public Financing Affect Judicial Behavior? Evidence From the North Carolina Supreme Court

    Open Access•Morgan L W Hazelton, Jacob M Montgomery et al.•American Politics Research•2016

  • Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation

    T R Tyler•Annual Review of Psychology•2005

  • Voting for women in nonpartisan and partisan elections

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Katelyn E Stauffer•Electoral Studies•2019

  • Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States

    Open Access•Matthew H Graham, Milan W Svolik•American Political Science Review•2020

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae