Disentangling the factors driving electronic word-of-mouth use through a configurational approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12420714 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ping Wang (0000-0001-6354-2235, Central China Normal University, corresponding author), Hongxiu Li (0000-0002-7447-1222, Tampere University), Liu Yong (0000-0002-0228-8971, Aalto University) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 925-943 |
| Publication date | 2020-02-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Internet Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1066-2243 • E-ISSN: 2054-5657 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/intr-01-2019-0031 |
| OpenAlex | W3006815374 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 55 |
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to show how different combinations of the subdimensions of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) information quality (consisting of its accuracy, completeness, relevance, timeliness, and sidedness) may affect consumers' eWOM use behavior from a configurational approach. Design/methodology/approach Based on a synthesis of past literature, five precursors of eWOM use were considered. A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was employed to understand the configurations that lead to travel-related eWOM use. The study was conducted with 311 consumers from an online travel service company. Findings Findings identified six solutions that explain eWOM use. EWOM accuracy, completeness, and sidedness are found to be core conditions reinforcing consumers' use of eWOM in combination with different peripheral conditions, including the subdimensions of eWOM information quality and the traits of the consumers (such as social media use time and gender). Practical implications Factors related to eWOM information quality and traits of the consumers, when considered in combination, predict eWOM use behavior in particular sets of conditions. Originality/value This work enriches the eWOM literature by providing an in-depth understanding of eWOM use from a configuration perspective. Configuration analysis serves as a better tool for explaining the complex relationships among variables than a regression analysis approach does. Additionally, in response to the need to move beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithmic approaches, this study shifts the emphasis from a symmetric paradigm to an asymmetric perspective for data analysis focused on eWOM use
Advertising · Business · Completeness (order theory · Information quality · Information system · Originality · Perspective (graphical · Qualitative comparative analysis · Quality (philosophy · Regression analysis · Computer Science · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour · Wine Industry and Tourism · Artificial Intelligence
Informational Influence in Organizations
New consumer behavior
Common method biases in behavioral research
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Self-Reports in Organizational Research
Vacationers and eWOM
E-WOM and Accommodation
The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication
Using case‐based approaches to analyse large datasets
The impact of electronic word‐of‐mouth
Explaining user experience in mobile gaming applications
Online travel reviews as persuasive communication
What makes an online consumer review trustworthy
Asymmetric effects of online consumer reviews
Why do travelers trust TripAdvisor? Antecedents of trust towards consumer-generated media and its influence on recommendation adoption and word of mouth
Using social network analysis to explain communication characteristics of travel-related electronic word-of-mouth on social networking sites
Hotel decision-making during multiple crises
Using Likert Scales in L2 Research. A Researcher Comments
Set Relations in Social Research
Explaining accountability for public policies
Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2023 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |