The Financialization of Knowledge and the Pooling of Populations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12424166 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Judith Solomon (0000-0002-1232-4761, corresponding author), Jon Solomon |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 175-207 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | positions asia critique (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1067-9847 • E-ISSN: 1527-8271 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/10679847-7251884 |
| OpenAlex | W2912825114 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 19 |
This essay presents a genealogy of the postcolonial/postimperial apparatus of area and charts its contemporary mutation in relation to the transition currently underway from industrial capitalism to bioinformatic capitalism. The restructuring of the university into a service industry that debuted in the 1990s has dramatically affected the milieu in which area studies are practiced. The key to understanding this dramatic change is to be found in the articulation of financialization, bioinformatic technologies, and population management. The creation of an intrinsic link between value production and life, understood as code, has profound ramifications for the organization of the humanities, which are still indebted to very powerful presuppositions not only about species difference (such as the difference between human and animal) but also about the way in which species difference is related to or reflected in social difference. While area studies remain tenaciously tied to the geographical index of anthropological difference inherited from the colonial-imperial modernity, they are today in the business, like the rest of the humanities, of contributing to the construction of an entirely new topography. This topography is generally not visible to the “specialists” who engage in area studies work, nor to the “native social species” they study. It is accessible only from the perspective of the facilities and institutions that handle the “metadata” produced out of academic evaluation bureaucracies. Such topography, based on the algorithmic abstractions of financialization, is capable of mapping movements in everything from gene pools and student migration to recombinant DNA and literary studies, and then further mapping all manner of correlations among the various domains. Hence, while the area studies apparatus was previously a form of institutionalized nation-state racism, today it is becoming part of the bioinformatic circuits of anthropological sampling in the neocon/neoliberal loop between corporate sovereignty and mass surveillance
Business · Capitalism · Epistemology · Financialization · Political science · Politics · Population · Presupposition · Relation (database · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Race, Genetics, and Society
Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor
Strange Circulations
Anthropos and Humanitas
Border as Method
Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America
Micro-Politics of Capital, The
The University in Ruins
The Order of Things
The Topicality of Prehistory
Primitive Accumulation and the Formation of Difference
Gilbert Simondon and the philosophy of the transindividual
Theory and Asian humanity
Sur la contestation du capital cognitif
"What Is an Apparatus?" and Other Essays
Neoliberal Political Economy, Biopolitics and Colonialism
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |