Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Defining and Measuring Democratic Norms

Bibliographic Data

ID12463514
AuthorsGretchen Helmke (0000-0002-6322-9086, Department of Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA; email: [email protected]), Jean Rath (0000-0003-1961-2763, University of Rochester), Josiah Rath (Department of Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA; email: [email protected])
Year2025
Volume28
Issue1
Pages233-251
Publication date2025-04-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnnual Review of Political Science (BOOK_SERIES)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1094-2939 • E-ISSN: 1545-1577
PublisherAnnual Reviews (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322-040610
OpenAlexW4409307142
LanguageEN
References cited65

If scholars and pundits are right, the erosion of norms in the United States and abroad poses a significant danger to democracy. Understanding what exactly norms are, what makes them democratic, and how best to measure them is thus essential for generating and evaluating explanations of how such norms weaken and collapse. Our article addresses each of these key elements. On the conceptual front, we argue for more precision in defining norms and more consideration in labeling them as democratic. On the measurement front, we develop a general utility function and use it to evaluate the various methodological strategies that researchers have deployed to causally identify democratic norms. In between, we synthesize the fast-growing literature on norms and democratic backsliding using a fourfold typology, with transgressors and enforcers on one dimension and political elites and citizens on the other. We conclude by pinpointing several new areas for future research

Democracy · Economics · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Sociology · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Public Administration

  • Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms

    Open Access•Katherine Clayton, Nicholas T Davis et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2021

  • Who will defend democracy? Evaluating tradeoffs in candidate support among partisan donors and voters

    John Michael Carey, Katherine Clayton et al.•Journal of Elections Public…•2022

  • Ethnic antagonism erodes Republicans’ commitment to democracy

    Open Access•Larry M Bartels•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • Current research overstates American support for political violence

    Open Access•Sean Westwood, Justin Grimmer et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2022

  • Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans’ support for partisan violence

    Open Access•Joseph S Mernyk, Sophia L Pink et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2022

  • Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts

    Open Access•John T Jost, Delia Baldassarri et al.•Nature Reviews Psychology•2022

  • The Evolution of Social Norms

    H Peyton Young•Annual Review of Economics•2015

  • From Extreme to Mainstream

    Leonardo Bursztyn, Georgy Egorov et al.•American Economic Review•2020

  • Social Norms and Community Enforcement

    Michihiro Kandori•The Review of Economic Studies•1992

  • Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans

    Open Access•Samantha L Moore-Berg, Lee-Or Ankori-Karlinsky et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct

    Robert B Cialdini, Carl A Kallgren et al.•Advances in Experimental Social…•1991

  • What shapes public support for climate change mitigation policies? The role of descriptive social norms and elite cues

    Open Access•Adrian Rinscheid, Silvia Pianta et al.•Behavioural Public Policy•2020

  • Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change

    Open Access•Margaret Tankard, Elizabeth Levy Paluck•Social Issues and Policy Review•2016

  • Social Norms and Social Change

    Ethan Bueno De Mesquita, Mehdi Shadmehr•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2023

  • The State as a Firm

    Open Access•Lenka Bustikova, Petra Guasti•East European Politics and…•2018

  • Rationality, emotions, and social norms

    Open Access•Jon Elster•Synthese•1994

  • Preference Falsification, Policy Continuity and Collective Conservatism

    Timur Kuran•The Economic Journal•1987

  • Social norms as choreography

    Open Access•Herbert Gintis•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2010

  • Democratic Hypocrisy and Out-Group Threat

    Gábor Simonovits, Jennifer Mccoy et al.•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • Social Norm Change, Political Symbols, and Expression of Stigmatized Preferences

    Elias Dinas, Sergi Martínez et al.•The Journal of Politics•2024

  • Fundamental Principles of Democracy

    James W Prothro, Charles M Grigg•The Journal of Politics•1960

  • How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms

    Open Access•Jon Kingzette, James N Druckman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • The impact of social desirability bias on conspiracy belief measurement across cultures

    Open Access•Steven M Smallpage, A M Enders et al.•Political Science Research and…•2023

  • How to study democratic backsliding

    Open Access•James N Druckman•Political Psychology•2024

  • Unwritten Rules

    Open Access•Julia R Azari, Julia Azari et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2012

  • Raising the Red Flag

    Open Access•Matthew Rhodes-Purdy, Fernando Rosenblatt•Perspectives on Politics•2023

  • Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency

    Open Access•John Michael Carey, Gretchen Helmke et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2019

  • Is the American Public Really Turning Away from Democracy? Backsliding and the Conceptual Challenges of Understanding Public Attitudes

    Open Access•Amel Ahmed•Perspectives on Politics•2023

  • On Democratic Backsliding

    Open Access•Nancy Bermeo•Journal of democracy•2016

  • Illusions About Consolidation

    Open Access•Guillermo A O''Donnell, Guillermo O’donnell et al.•Journal of democracy•1996

  • Who Decides What Is Democratic

    Open Access•Adam Przeworski•Journal of democracy•2024

  • False Commitments

    Open Access•Karisa Cloward•International Organization•2014

  • The partisan nature of support for democratic backsliding

    Open Access•Elisabeth Gidengil, Dietlind Stolle et al.•European Journal of Political…•2022

  • What Do We Learn about Voter Preferences from Conjoint Experiments

    Open Access•Scott F Abramson, Korhan Kocak et al.•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • Why Politicians Are More Tolerant

    Open Access•John L Sullivan, Pat Walsh et al.•British Journal of Political…•1993

  • Measuring Democratic Backsliding

    Open Access•Andrew T Little, Alicia Meng•PS Political Science & Politics•2024

  • Do the right thing

    Open Access•Cristina Bicchieri, Erte Xiao•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2008

  • Social Norms and Social Roles

    Cass R Sunstein•Columbia Law Review•1996

  • Ending Footbinding and Infibulation

    Gerry Mackie•American Sociological Review•1996

  • Social Norms and Economic Theory

    Open Access•Jon Elster•The Journal of Economic…•1989

  • The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections

    Open Access•Joshua L Kalla, David E Broockman•American Political Science Review•2018

  • The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of the Law

    Open Access•Barry R Weingast•American Political Science Review•1997

  • The Authentic Appeal of the Lying Demagogue

    Open Access•Oliver Hahl, Minjae Kim et al.•American Sociological Review•2018

  • Why voters who value democracy participate in democratic backsliding

    Open Access•Ann Braley, Gabriel S Lenz et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

  • The general fault in our fault lines

    Open Access•Kai Ruggeri, Bojana Većkalov et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2021

  • Spontaneous Order

    Open Access•Robert Sugden•The Journal of Economic…•1989

  • Institutions

    Open Access•Douglass C North•The Journal of Economic…•1991

  • Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies

    Open Access•Dennis Chong, James N Druckman•American Political Science Review•2007

  • Some Social Requisites of Democracy

    Open Access•Seymour Martin Lipset•American Political Science Review•1959

  • Social Pressure and Voter Turnout

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber, Donald P Green et al.•American Political Science Review•2008

  • Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States

    Open Access•Matthew H Graham, Milan W Svolik•American Political Science Review•2020

  • An Evolutionary Approach to Norms

    Open Access•Robert Axelrod•American Political Science Review•1986

  • Norms

    C Horne, Mollborn et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2020

  • Changing Social Norms

    Jean Ensminger, Jack Knight•Current Anthropology•1997

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae