Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evaluation Paradoxes

Responding to Tensions Between Stability and Change in Social Investment Evaluation

Bibliographic Data

ID12470980
AuthorsKettil Nordesjö (0000-0003-3565-6563, Malmö University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume45
Issue4
Pages519-535
Publication date2023-07-24
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/10982140231185741
OpenAlexW4385241563
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited38

The relationship between stability and change is a central paradox of administration that pervades all forms of organizing. Evaluation is not unfamiliar with paradoxical objectives and roles, which can result in tensions for evaluators and stakeholders. In this article, paradoxes between stability and change in the implementation of evaluation, and responses to them, are investigated through the case of social investment funds in Swedish local government. From interviews with staff, managers, and evaluators, findings show how responses to four main paradoxes give priority to top-down summative evaluation that produces instrumental knowledge on outcomes and costs for decision makers. The responses show that the concept of social investment fund evaluation is elastic to contain paradoxes and address different audiences. Also, paradoxes within the structure of the organization develop into paradoxes concerning the roles and goals of evaluation, raising the question of whether individual actors can deal with paradoxes

Administration (probate law · Economics · Epistemology · Formative assessment · Government (linguistics · Investment (military · Management · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Public relations · Sociology · Stability (learning theory · Summative assessment · Theory of change · Community Development and Social Impact · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Law · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Psychology

  • The persuasion of evaluation

    Open Access•Kettil Nordesjö•Acta Sociologica•2025

  • Toward a Theory of Paradox

    Wilson K Smith, Wendy K Smith et al.•Academy of Management Review•2011

  • Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension

    Sarah J Tracy•Journal of Applied Communication…•2004

  • Beyond Dualism

    Moshe Farjoun•Academy of Management Review•2010

  • Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review

    Sarah De Rijcke, Paul Wouters et al.•Research Evaluation•2016

  • Social Impact Measurement

    Open Access•Hans Rawhouser, Michael Cummings et al.•Entrepreneurship Theory and…•2019

  • Responding to competing strategic demands

    Open Access•Paula Jarzabkowski, Jane Kirsten Lê et al.•Strategic Organization•2013

  • Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations

    Linda L Putnam, Gail T Fairhurst et al.•Academy of Management Annals•2016

  • Thematic analysis.

    Braun, Victoria Clarke•APA Handbook of Research Methods…•2012

  • Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning

    James G March•Organization Science•1991

  • Dynamic persistence in UK policy making

    Open Access•Alex Nicholls, Simon Teasdale•Public Management Review•2021

  • Systems thinking, knowledge and action

    Allan Best, Bev Holmes•Evidence & Policy•2010

  • A small wins framework to overcome the evaluation paradox of governing wicked problems

    Open Access•Catrien J A M Termeer, Cjam Termeer et al.•Policy and Society•2018

  • Understanding social impact assessment through Public Value Theory

    Open Access•Bryan Dufour, Francesca Petrella et al.•Annals of Public and Cooperative…•2021

  • The logics of performance management

    Open Access•Christopher Pollitt•Evaluation•2013

  • The constitutive effects of social investment evaluation

    Open Access•Kettil Nordesjö•Evaluation•2020

  • Made in Sweden

    Open Access•Kettil Nordesjö•Evaluation•2018

  • Does Evaluation Build or Destroy Trust

    Open Access•Christine Schwarz, Gerlinde Struhkamp•Evaluation•2007

  • Understanding evaluation practice within the context of social investment

    Open Access•Anne T Vo, Christina A Christie et al.•Evaluation•2016

  • Biopolitical power and paradoxes in evaluation research with transnational migrant youth

    Open Access•Sylvia Rodríguez, Jeremy Acree•Evaluation•2020

  • Responsive Evaluation and Performance Management

    Open Access•Peter van der Knaap•Evaluation•2006

  • Choosing Evaluation Models

    Open Access•Hanne Foss Hansen•Evaluation•2005

  • Paradoxes of Social Impact Bonds

    Open Access•Florentine Maier, Gian Paolo Barbetta et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2018

  • Dilemmas in a general theory of planning

    Open Access•Horst W J Rittel, Melvin M Webber•Policy Sciences•1973

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae