Money or children? Power sources in divorce mediation 1

Bibliographic Data

ID12517153
AuthorsKatalien Bollen (0000-0002-2850-2104, KU Leuven, corresponding author), Katalien N L Bollen, Alain-Laurent Verbeke (KU Leuven), Martin C Euwema, Martin Euwema (0000-0003-0981-4855, KU Leuven)
Year2013
Volume19
Issue2
Pages159-173
Publication date2013-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Family Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1322-9400 • E-ISSN: 1839-3543
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.5172/jfs.2013.19.2.159
OpenAlexW2092198834
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited3

In Western societies, family law has transformed from a hierarchical relationship into a system of gender-neutral equality aspiring terms. Many families however, still apply traditional, gendered patterns in their division of labour and family life, even in a country like The Netherlands which is characterised by strong gender egalitarianism. In this paper we argue that the division of gender-based roles in family life affects power distribution in divorce mediation as well as the use of certain power resources by men and women. To test this, we survey 60 experienced Dutch mediators and introduce a new classification model for power sources distinguishing between material and immaterial power. As predicted, in divorce mediation, mediators perceive generally an equal power distribution between men and women, but power bases differ strongly: whereas men were considered to rely more on material resources, women were considered to rely more on immaterial resources. Implications for mediation practice are discussed

Demographic economics · Distribution (mathematics · Economics · Egalitarianism · Mediation · Political science · Power (physics · Social science · Sociology · Gender and Women's Rights · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Law · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub