Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Understanding the social worker–family relationship through self‐determination theory

A realist synthesis of Signs of Safety

Bibliographic Data

ID12569996
AuthorsLouise Caffrey (0000-0003-1608-5830, Social Policy, School of Social Work & Social Policy Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland, corresponding author), Freda Browne (0000-0002-8370-629X, General Nursing, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems University College Dublin Dublin Ireland)
Year2022
Volume27
Issue3
Pages513-525
Publication date2022-01-26
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChild & Family Social Work (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1356-7500 • E-ISSN: 1365-2206
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/cfs.12903
PMID36246041
OpenAlexW4210429362
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited31

Signs of Safety (SofS) is a popular framework for child protection social work practice, used in more than 200 jurisdictions worldwide. Although workers tend to find SofS tools easy to use, skilled application of the approach is challenging, and research has found that SofS is often not implemented as intended. This study aimed to deepen and inform the explanation (initial theory) of what key SofS tools and processes are expected to achieve in the family-worker interaction and why. A realist synthesis was used, involving a realist review of literature and focus groups with 22 international SofS experts. Using self-determination theory, we detail how SofS can be conceptualized as aiming to support families to experience 'autonomous' rather than 'controlled' motivation by supporting basic human needs for 'autonomy' (feeling a sense of volition), 'competence' (feeling effective) and 'relatedness' (feeling cared for). This explanation can be used for training and evaluation purposes to better explain and test how SofS expects to engage families in the child protection process. More broadly, we suggest that self-determination theory may contribute a mechanistic explanation of effective social work practice more generally and that this hypothesis should be empirically investigated

Developmental psychology · Economics · Sociology · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Social Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work

  • Reconocer a la familia como sujeto democrático

    Open Access•Lina María Martínez-González, Natalia Andrea Castrillón-Agudelo et al.•Eleuthera•2025

  • Parent Engagement and the Child Welfare System

    Open Access•Carrie Furrer, Nicole Lauzus et al.•Families in Society The Journal…•2023

  • Solution-focused approach

    Karmen Toros, Asgeir Falch‐eriksen•Journal of Family Social Work•2024

  • Self-determination Theory and Social Work Values

    Open Access•Rachel S Kirzner, Marianne Miserandino•Research on Social Work Practice•2023

  • Families’ perspectives on the impact of signs of safety in child protection services through the lens of self-determination theory

    Open Access•Lana De Clercq, Florien Meulewaeter et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2025

  • The signs of safety framework in child protection practice

    Open Access•Karmen Toros, Andrew Turnell et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2026

  • Health and social care practitioners' experiences of exercising professional curiosity in child protection practice

    Open Access•Christine E Muirden, Jane V Appleton•Health & Social Care in the…•2022

  • Children’s experiences of Signs of Safety

    Open Access•Louise Caffrey, Eavan Brady et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2024

  • New-materialist bricolage

    Open Access•Suzanne Flynn, Louise Caffrey et al.•International Journal of Social…•2024

  • Understanding the social worker–family relationship through self‐determination theory

    Open Access•Louise Caffrey, Freda Browne•Child & Family Social Work•2022

  • Creating conditions that encourage youth engagement in family child welfare case planning meetings

    Open Access•Carrie Furrer, Carrie J Furrer et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2023

  • The challenge of implementation in complex, adaptive child welfare systems

    Open Access•Louise Caffrey, Freda Browne•Children and Youth Services Review•2023

  • Just because we can does not mean we should

    Open Access•Lisa Holmes, R Hood et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2026

  • Evidence-Based Policy

    Nancy Cartwright, Jeremy Hardie•Evidence-based policy•2012

  • The Science of Evaluation

    Ray Pawson•The Science of Evaluation•2013

  • Self-Determination Theory

    Richard M Ryan, Edward L Deci•Self-Determination Theory•2017

  • Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions

    Open Access•Ray Pawson, Trisha Greenhalgh et al.•Journal of Health Services…•2005

  • Motivational Interviewing and Self–Determination Theory

    David Markland, Richard M Ryan et al.•Journal of Social and Clinical…•2005

  • Self-Determination Theory Applied to Health Contexts

    Open Access•Johan Y Y Ng, Nikos Ntoumanis et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2012

  • Process evaluation of complex interventions

    Open Access•Gary F Moore, Suzanne Audrey et al.•BMJ•2015

  • Social learning theory

    Albert Bandura•Social learning theory•1977

  • Middle-range theory

    Open Access•Nancy Cartwright•THEORIA An International Journal…•2020

  • Classical Sociological Theory

    Open Access•Alan Sica•The Wiley Blackwell Companion to…•2019

  • Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations

    Edward L Deci, Anja H Olafsen et al.•Annual Review of Organizational…•2017

  • Practice Frameworks in Children’s Services in England

    Mary Baginsky, Graham Ixer et al.•Practice•2020

  • Understanding the social worker–family relationship through self‐determination theory

    Open Access•Louise Caffrey, Freda Browne•Child & Family Social Work•2022

  • An International Effort to Develop a Fidelity Measure for Signs of Safety®

    Open Access•Yvonne Humenay Roberts, Michael Caslor et al.•Research on Social Work Practice•2018

  • Changing the way we do child protection’

    Open Access•Mary Salveron, Leah Bromfield et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2015

  • Theorising the signs of safety approach to child protection social work

    Open Access•E Keddell•Children and Youth Services Review•2014

  • Signs of effectiveness of signs of safety? – A pilot study

    Open Access•Sari E Reekers, Sharon Dijkstra et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2018

  • Implementation of a solution based approach for child protection

    Open Access•Brigit Rijbroek, Mathilde M H Strating et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2017

  • Reasoning Processes in Child Protection Decision Making

    E Keddell•The British Journal of Social Work•2011

  • Realist Evaluation for Practice

    M Kazi•The British Journal of Social Work•2003

  • Retroductive theorizing in Pawson and Tilley's applied scientific realism

    Justin Jagosh•Journal of Critical Realism•2020

  • The craft of interviewing in realist evaluation

    Open Access•Ana Manzano•Evaluation•2016

  • Building Realist Program Theory for Large Complex and Messy Interventions

    Open Access•Katie Shearn, Peter Allmark et al.•International Journal of…•2017

  • Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices

    Open Access•C May, Tracy Finch•Sociology•2009

Citations per year3.25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae