The Video Engagement Scale (VES)
Measurement properties of the full and shortened VES across studies
Bibliographic Data
The Video Engagement Scale (VES) is a quality indicator to assess engagement in experimental video-vignette studies, but its measurement properties warrant improvement. Data from previous studies were combined (N = 2676) and split into three subsamples for a stepped analytical approach. We tested construct validity, criterion validity, reliability, and measurement invariance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) reiterated poor fit of the previously suggested subscales. An alternative 2-factor structure is presented, which was cross-validated and further shortened (VES-sf). Reliability of both subscales (Immersion, Emotional Impact) was very high (alpha > .86). Multi-group CFAs demonstrated partial and complete measurement invariance among male/female and differently educated participants respectively. Invariance between healthy versus ill participants was not established, but CFAs supported the VES-sf structure in both groups separately. To conclude, we provide the VES-sf with sound measurement properties and demonstrated the appropriateness of comparing certain subgroups. Overall, we recommend the VES-sf to assess engagement/ecological validity in video-vignette research
Confirmatory factor analysis · Construct validity · Criterion validity · External validity · Measurement invariance · Psychometrics · Reliability (semiconductor · Scale (ratio · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Vignette · Aging and Gerontology Research · Applied Psychology · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Child Abuse and Trauma · Clinical Psychology · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology
Identification as a Mechanism of Narrative Persuasion
Recent Developments in Structural Equation Modeling
Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
A Scaled Difference Chi-Square Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis
Can Naive Viewers Put Themselves in the Patients’ Shoes
Three Likelihood-Based Methods for Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis with Nonnormal Missing Data
A power primer
Exploratory Factor Analysis
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |