Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Using artificial intelligence (AI)? Risk and opportunity perception of AI predict people’s willingness to use AI

Bibliographic Data

ID12598486
AuthorsRebekka Schwesig (0000-0003-1761-1660, University of Tübingen), Irina Brich (0000-0001-6425-290X, Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany), Jürgen Buder (0000-0002-0872-3487, Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany), Markus Huff (0000-0002-1433-4656, University of Tübingen), Nadia Said (0000-0002-0462-8554, University of Tübingen, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume26
Issue10
Pages1053-1084
Publication date2023-10-03
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Risk Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1366-9877 • E-ISSN: 1466-4461
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13669877.2023.2249927
OpenAlexW4387540157
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited50

Surveys worldwide show that the public perceives artificial intelligence (AI) as a double-edged sword: A risk and an opportunity. However, how this ambiguous perception of AI is related to people’s willingness to use AI-based applications has yet to be investigated. To this end, two online experiments were conducted, including two samples, N = 246 and N = 495 (quota-sample, representative for age and gender). As hypothesized, people’s risk-opportunity perception of AI applications correlated positively with the probability of using AI. Exploratory analyses indicated that people’s willingness to use AI significantly depended on the context of AI use (medicine vs. transport vs. media vs. psychology). This research expands existing behavioral research by investigating ambiguous and not solely risk-taking behavior for different AI application contexts. Study results motivate the investigation of causal-effect relations and underline the need to understand risk and opportunity perception stability across different contexts of AI use

Context (archaeology · Exploratory research · Perception · Research ethics · Risk perception · Social science · Sociology · Applied Psychology · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Risk Perception and Management · Social Psychology

  • What generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) risks make the news? representation of GenAI risk in Australian digital news

    Chenchen Wang•Media International Australia•2026

  • Identifying Measurement Dimensions of Users’ Benefit-Risk Perceptions of AI in Healthcare

    Open Access•Haoning Shi, Yue Xiang et al.•INQUIRY The Journal of Health…•2026

  • “There Are Risks, but I Will Use It Anyway”

    Open Access•Jörg Matthes, Selma Hodzic et al.•Human Behavior and Emerging…•2026

  • Health sciences students’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Cihan Unal, Selim Şahin•BMC Medical Education•2026

  • Fear of the new technology

    Open Access•Guoyu Wang, Bojan Obrenovic et al.•Current Psychology•2025

  • Quality of Decision-Making Processes in Teams

    Open Access•Marisa Schirmer, Selina Fußwinkel et al.•Group Decision and Negotiation•2026

  • From interface to inference

    Open Access•Haoyu Zhao, Huan Zhong et al.•Telematics and Informatics•2025

  • Extending the planned risk information seeking model (PRISM) in the context of artificial intelligence

    P Ai, Benjamin J Li et al.•Behaviour and Information…•2026

  • Trust in ChatGPT for political information consumption

    Open Access•Bingyu Chen, Ruolan Deng et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2026

  • Government regulation or industry self-regulation of AI? Investigating the relationships between uncertainty avoidance, people’s AI risk perceptions, and their regulatory preferences in Europe

    Open Access•Bartosz Wilczek, Sina Thäsler-Kordonouri et al.•AI & Society•2025

  • What factors predict user acceptance of ChatGPT for mental and physical healthcare

    Open Access•Sage Kelly, Sherrie-Anne Kaye et al.•AI & Society•2025

  • Seeking With Sentiment

    Open Access•Bingbing Zhang, Nihar Sreepada•Media and Communication•2026

  • Charting the AI perception gap

    Open Access•Philipp Brauner, Felix Glawe et al.•AI & Society•2026

  • Maximizing work efficiency in the age of AI

    Ali Khan, Ali Nawaz Khan et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2025

  • The multidimensional structure of risk

    Tyler Romualdi, Tyler Girard et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2025

  • Do AI systems think fast or slow? Testing dual-process patterns in AI risk assessment

    Russell Lundberg•Journal of Risk Research•2026

  • Welcome to the dark side

    Edoardo Crocco, Elisa Ballesio et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2026

  • Generative AI for enhanced risk management in SMEs

    Open Access•Eamon Leonard, Barry Sheehan et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2026

  • AI scientists’ and lay publics’ views of AI’s social impacts

    Luye Bao, Mikhaila N Calice et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2025

  • Association between Generative AI self-efficacy and Generative AI acceptance

    Open Access•Gen Zhang, Tingrong Yu•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • Artificial intelligence in medicine

    Open Access•Nadia Said, Lea Schumacher et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2025

  • Attitudes toward AI in health- and non-health-related contexts

    Open Access•Kamilla Boda, Andras Matuz et al.•Acta Psychologica•2026

  • Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Baobao Zhang, Allan Dafoe•SSRN Electronic Journal•2019

  • Risk Perception and Self-Protective Behavior

    Joop Van Der Pligt•European Psychologist•1996

  • Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making

    Open Access•Valerie F Reyna, Frank H Farley et al.•Psychological Science in the…•2006

  • Model Selection and Multimodel Inference

    Open Access•Fred S Guthery, Kenneth P Burnham et al.•Journal of Wildlife Management•2003

  • Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior

    Noel T Brewer, Neil D Weinstein et al.•Annals of Behavioral Medicine•2004

  • Developing a Broadly Applicable Measure of Risk Perception

    Open Access•Robyn S Wilson, Adam Zwickle et al.•Risk Analysis•2019

  • Perceived Risk Attitudes

    Open Access•Elke U Weber, Richard A Milliman•Management Science•1997

  • Are Women Really More Risk‐averse Than Men? A Re‐analysis of the Literature Using Expanded Methods

    Open Access•Julie A Nelson•Journal of Economic Surveys•2015

  • Chapter 113 Men, Women and Risk Aversion

    Catherine C Eckel, Philip J Grossman•Handbook of Results in…•2008

  • Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior

    Noel T Brewer, Gretchen B Chapman et al.•Health Psychology•2007

  • Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model

    Open Access•Irwin M Rosenstock•Health Education Monographs•1974

  • The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

    J R Landis, Gary G Koch•Biometrics•1977

  • The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards

    Open Access•Gisela Wachinger, Ortwin Renn et al.•Risk Analysis•2013

  • User Perceptions of Algorithmic Decisions in the Personalized AI System

    Doh Shin•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2020

  • In Platforms We Trust?Unlocking the Black-Box of News Algorithms through Interpretable AI

    Doh Shin, Bouziane Zaid et al.•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2022

  • Whose AI? How different publics think about AI and its social impacts

    Open Access•Luye Bao, Nicole M Krause et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2022

  • An artificial intelligence perspective

    Open Access•Nadia Said, Andreea E Potinteu et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2023

  • Expert and Public Perception of Risk from Biotechnology

    Open Access•Lucia Savadori, Stefania Savio et al.•Risk Analysis•2004

  • A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1

    Ronald W Rogers•The Journal of Psychology•1975

  • A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship Between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit

    Open Access•Ali Alhakami, Ali Siddiq Alhakami et al.•Risk Analysis•1994

  • Assessing adolescent decision-making competence

    Open Access•Baruch Fischhoff•Developmental Review•2008

  • A dual-process approach to health risk decision making

    Open Access•Meg Gerrard, Frederick X Gibbons et al.•Developmental Review•2008

  • The role of expertise in risk communication

    Jan M Gutteling, M KUTTSCHREUTER•Journal of Risk Research•2002

  • Perception of risk

    Michael Siegrist, Heinz Gutscher et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2005

  • Extending a broadly applicable measure of risk perception

    Hugh Walpole, Robyn S Wilson•Journal of Risk Research•2020

  • Not-So-Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking

    Julie A Nelson•Feminist Economics•2015

  • How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits

    Open Access•Baruch Fischhoff, Paul Slovic et al.•Policy Sciences•1978

  • Does heightening risk appraisals change people's intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies

    Paschal Sheeran, Peter R Harris et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2014

Citations per year22
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae