Implications of online incidental and selective exposure for political emotions
Affective polarization during elections
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12656016 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Qinfeng Zhu (0000-0001-8038-0274, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, corresponding author), Brian E Weeks (0000-0003-2355-2302, University of Michigan), Nojin Kwak (University of Michigan) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 450-472 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Media & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-4448 • E-ISSN: 1461-7315 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14614448211061336 |
| OpenAlex | W4200576326 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 68 |
The Internet and social media create an environment in which individuals can selectively approach information supporting their political worldviews while also being incidentally exposed to socially shared information that challenges their beliefs. These competing information consumption patterns may help explain whether and how digital media contribute to affective polarization (i.e. affect-based division between political groups). This study examines how pro-attitudinal selective exposure and counter-attitudinal incidental exposure in tandem influence political emotions. Using data from 2, two-wave panel surveys conducted during the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections, our findings demonstrate that seeking consonant political information is consistently associated with anger toward political opponents and enthusiasm toward like-minded partisans. In contrast, despite the purported democratic benefits endowed on political disagreement, cross-cutting incidental exposure does not temper political emotional responses associated with pro-attitudinal selective exposure. However, we find little evidence that unexpected exposure to disagreeable information backfires either
Affect (linguistics · Anger · Democracy · Enthusiasm · Information seeking · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Unpacking Selective and Incidental Exposure Paths to Political Tolerance
Attitudes or Emotions as News Compasses? Comparing Attitudinal and Emotional Guidance in Selecting News About Migration
Exploring the Paradox of Cross-Cutting Exposure and Affective Polarization
From silence to action
Do we always cast our votes with accurate information? The mediating role of misperception in the relationship between partisan media use and retrospective voting
How Political Overconfidence Fuels Affective Polarization in Cross-cutting Discussions
Frozen discourse
How Mass and Social Media (De) polarize America
Addressing “Political Anger” And “Non-Political Fear” In News Engagement
Hate prompts participation
A review and provocation
Compounded marginalization in social media politics
Do News Frames Really Have Some Influence in the Real World? A Computational Analysis of Cumulative Framing Effects on Emotions and Opinions About Immigration
From information exposure to legal consciousness
Beyond negativity? A laboratory study on emotional responses to populist strategies on social media
Beyond a fragmented account of conflicts in communication
Party or policy? Examining news consumption and affective polarization in Italy
Pathways from incidental news exposure to political knowledge
The Mediating Effects of Counter‐Attitudinal Exposure, Political Knowledge, and Trust in Government on Community Connectedness
Feeling the split
Birds of a Feather Get Angrier Together
When like-minded news heals
Accidentally Informed
Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization
Does Disagreement Mitigate Polarization? How Selective Exposure and Disagreement Affect Political Polarization
Influencing Myself
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations
Facebook news and (de)polarization
Learning Political Information From the News
Online Groups and Political Discourse
Seeing Media as Group Members
Reinforcement of the Political Self Through Selective Exposure to Political Messages
Political Online Information Searching in Germany and the United States
Causal Analysis with Panel Data
Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure
Hearing the Other Side
Political News in the News Feed
Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites
Stumbling upon the other side
Does incidental exposure on social media equalize or reinforce participatory gaps? Evidence from a panel study
Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis
Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom
Connection strategies
Effects of the News-Finds-Me Perception in Communication
Echo chambers online
Incidental Exposure, Selective Exposure, and Political Information Sharing
Reinforcing Spirals
How Messages Affect Their Senders
What Underlies the False Consensus Effect? How Personal Opinion and Disagreement Affect Perception of Public Opinion
Pick and choose” opinion climate
Pulling Toward or Pulling Away
The Matthew Effect in social media news use
Attracting the news
Conceptualizing different forms of news processing following incidental news contact
The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens
Partisan Provocation
Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making
Improving Media Effects Research through Better Measurement of News Exposure
A Cross-Cutting Calm
All the News You Want to Hear
Selective Exposure in the Internet Age
Can Interparty Contact Reduce Affective Polarization? A Systematic Test of Different Forms of Intergroup Contact
Exposure to Political Disagreement in Social Media Versus Face-to-Face and Anonymous Online Settings
Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion
The “Who” Matters
Social Networks and the Affective Impact of Political Disagreement
A Turn Toward Avoidance? Selective Exposure to Online Political Information, 2004–2008
Media Use and Political Predispositions
(Almost) Everything in Moderation
Civic Engagements
Why Do Partisan Media Polarize Viewers
The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
The Hostile Audience
Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments
Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Affect, Not Ideology
Cross-cutting Social Networks
The Myth of Partisan Selective Exposure
Implications of Pro- and Counterattitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization
Social Identity, Selective Exposure, and Affective Polarization
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |