Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Implications of online incidental and selective exposure for political emotions

Affective polarization during elections

Bibliographic Data

ID12656016
AuthorsQinfeng Zhu (0000-0001-8038-0274, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, corresponding author), Brian E Weeks (0000-0003-2355-2302, University of Michigan), Nojin Kwak (University of Michigan)
Year2021
Volume26
Issue1
Pages450-472
Publication date2021-12-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNew Media & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1461-4448 • E-ISSN: 1461-7315
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/14614448211061336
OpenAlexW4200576326
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited68

The Internet and social media create an environment in which individuals can selectively approach information supporting their political worldviews while also being incidentally exposed to socially shared information that challenges their beliefs. These competing information consumption patterns may help explain whether and how digital media contribute to affective polarization (i.e. affect-based division between political groups). This study examines how pro-attitudinal selective exposure and counter-attitudinal incidental exposure in tandem influence political emotions. Using data from 2, two-wave panel surveys conducted during the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections, our findings demonstrate that seeking consonant political information is consistently associated with anger toward political opponents and enthusiasm toward like-minded partisans. In contrast, despite the purported democratic benefits endowed on political disagreement, cross-cutting incidental exposure does not temper political emotional responses associated with pro-attitudinal selective exposure. However, we find little evidence that unexpected exposure to disagreeable information backfires either

Affect (linguistics · Anger · Democracy · Enthusiasm · Information seeking · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Unpacking Selective and Incidental Exposure Paths to Political Tolerance

    Open Access•Muhammad Masood, Saifuddin Ahmed•International Journal of Public…•2025

  • Attitudes or Emotions as News Compasses? Comparing Attitudinal and Emotional Guidance in Selecting News About Migration

    Open Access•Nico Spreen, Pablo Jost•The International Journal of…•2026

  • Exploring the Paradox of Cross-Cutting Exposure and Affective Polarization

    Han Lin, Xuejin Jiang et al.•Media Psychology•2025

  • From silence to action

    Open Access•Sihao Yang, Kun Peng•Current Psychology•2025

  • Do we always cast our votes with accurate information? The mediating role of misperception in the relationship between partisan media use and retrospective voting

    Jinwan Kim, Jaewan Lee et al.•Asian Journal of Communication•2025

  • How Political Overconfidence Fuels Affective Polarization in Cross-cutting Discussions

    Open Access•Han Lin, Yonghwan Kim•Communication Research•2026

  • Frozen discourse

    Open Access•Tal Orian Harel•Information Communication & Society•2025

  • How Mass and Social Media (De) polarize America

    Open Access•Seungsu Lee, Jaeho Cho•Communication and the Public•2026

  • Addressing “Political Anger” And “Non-Political Fear” In News Engagement

    W Zou, Jiayu Gina Qu et al.•Mass Communication & Society•2026

  • Hate prompts participation

    Open Access•Sangwon Lee, Jihyang Choi et al.•New Media & Society•2023

  • A review and provocation

    Open Access•Daniel Krei, Shannon C Mcgregor•New Media & Society•2024

  • Compounded marginalization in social media politics

    Open Access•Saifuddin Ahmed, Ruolan Deng et al.•New Media & Society•2026

  • Do News Frames Really Have Some Influence in the Real World? A Computational Analysis of Cumulative Framing Effects on Emotions and Opinions About Immigration

    Open Access•Лэй Гуо, Charlie C Su et al.•The International Journal of…•2023

  • From information exposure to legal consciousness

    Open Access•Liu Peng, Min Tian et al.•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • Beyond negativity? A laboratory study on emotional responses to populist strategies on social media

    Open Access•Jenny Lindholm, Jesper Eklund et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2024

  • Beyond a fragmented account of conflicts in communication

    Open Access•Wenqing Zhao, Yan Jin et al.•Annals of the International…•2025

  • Party or policy? Examining news consumption and affective polarization in Italy

    David Coppini•Contemporary Italian Politics•2025

  • Pathways from incidental news exposure to political knowledge

    Open Access•Saifuddin Ahmed, Teresa Gil-Lopez et al.•New Media & Society•2024

  • The Mediating Effects of Counter‐Attitudinal Exposure, Political Knowledge, and Trust in Government on Community Connectedness

    Open Access•Ying Xiong•Social Science Quarterly•2025

  • Feeling the split

    Open Access•Pedro Fierro•Environment and Planning C…•2026

  • Birds of a Feather Get Angrier Together

    Open Access•Z Cheng, Hugo Marcos-Marne et al.•Political Behavior•2024

  • When like-minded news heals

    Open Access•Minwei Ai•Media International Australia•2025

  • Accidentally Informed

    Open Access•David Tewksbury, Andrew J Weaver et al.•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2001

  • Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization

    Levi Boxell, Matthew Gentzkow et al.•National Bureau of Economic…•2020

  • Does Disagreement Mitigate Polarization? How Selective Exposure and Disagreement Affect Political Polarization

    Open Access•Yonghwan Kim•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2015

  • Influencing Myself

    Open Access•Jaeho Cho, Saifuddin Ahmed et al.•Communication Research•2018

  • Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook

    Open Access•Eytan Bakshy, Messing et al.•Science•2015

  • Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization

    Open Access•Christopher A Bail, Chris Bail et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations

    Henri Tajfel•Annual Review of Psychology•1982

  • Facebook news and (de)polarization

    Michael A Beam, Myiah J Hutchens et al.•Information Communication & Society•2018

  • Learning Political Information From the News

    Open Access•Clarissa C David•Journal of Communication•2009

  • Online Groups and Political Discourse

    Open Access•Magdalena Wojcieszak, Magdalena E Wojcieszak et al.•Journal of Communication•2009

  • Seeing Media as Group Members

    Open Access•Natalie Jomini Stroud, Ashley Muddiman et al.•Journal of Communication•2014

  • Reinforcement of the Political Self Through Selective Exposure to Political Messages

    Open Access•Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia Knobloch‐westerwick et al.•Journal of Communication•2011

  • Political Online Information Searching in Germany and the United States

    Open Access•Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia Knobloch‐westerwick et al.•Journal of Communication•2015

  • Causal Analysis with Panel Data

    Steven E Finkel, Steven Finkel•Causal analysis with panel data•1995

  • Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure

    Open Access•Natalie Jomini Stroud•Journal of Communication•2010

  • Hearing the Other Side

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•Hearing the Other Side•2006

  • Political News in the News Feed

    Leticia Bode•Mass Communication & Society•2015

  • Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites

    Open Access•Kyle A Heatherly, Yanqin Lu et al.•New Media & Society•2016

  • Stumbling upon the other side

    Open Access•Yanqin Lu, Jae Kook Lee•New Media & Society•2018

  • Does incidental exposure on social media equalize or reinforce participatory gaps? Evidence from a panel study

    Open Access•Robert Hei, Jörg Matthes•New Media & Society•2019

  • Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis

    Open Access•Richard Fletcher, R K Nielsen•New Media & Society•2017

  • Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Augusto Valeriani, C Vaccari•New Media & Society•2015

  • Connection strategies

    Open Access•Nicole B Ellison, Charles Steinfield et al.•New Media & Society•2011

  • Effects of the News-Finds-Me Perception in Communication

    Open Access•Homero Gil De Zúñiga, Brian E Weeks et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2017

  • Echo chambers online

    Open Access•R Kelly Garrett•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2009

  • Incidental Exposure, Selective Exposure, and Political Information Sharing

    Open Access•Brian E Weeks, D S Lane et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2017

  • Reinforcing Spirals

    Open Access•Michael D Slater•Communication Theory•2007

  • How Messages Affect Their Senders

    Open Access•Raymond J Pingree•Communication Theory•2007

  • What Underlies the False Consensus Effect? How Personal Opinion and Disagreement Affect Perception of Public Opinion

    Magdalena Wojcieszak, Vincent Price•International Journal of Public…•2009

  • Pick and choose” opinion climate

    Daniel Sude, Daniel J Sude et al.•Communication Monographs•2019

  • Pulling Toward or Pulling Away

    Open Access•Magdalena Wojcieszak•Social Science Quarterly•2011

  • The Matthew Effect in social media news use

    Open Access•Anna Sophie Kümpel•Journalism•2020

  • Attracting the news

    Open Access•Kjerstin Thorson•Journalism•2020

  • Conceptualizing different forms of news processing following incidental news contact

    Open Access•Mareike Wieland, Katharina Kleinen-Von Königslöw et al.•Journalism•2020

  • The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens

    W P Eveland, JR WILLIAM P EVELAND•Political Communication•2004

  • Partisan Provocation

    Open Access•A Hasell, Brian E Weeks•Human Communication Research•2016

  • Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making

    David P Redlawsk•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • Improving Media Effects Research through Better Measurement of News Exposure

    Markus Prior•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • A Cross-Cutting Calm

    L Mason•Public Opinion Quarterly•2016

  • All the News You Want to Hear

    Susanna Dilliplane, Dilliplane•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • Selective Exposure in the Internet Age

    Open Access•Nicholas A Valentino, Antoine J Banks et al.•Political Psychology•2009

  • Can Interparty Contact Reduce Affective Polarization? A Systematic Test of Different Forms of Intergroup Contact

    Magdalena Wojcieszak, Benjamin R Warner•Political Communication•2020

  • Exposure to Political Disagreement in Social Media Versus Face-to-Face and Anonymous Online Settings

    Matthew Barnidge•Political Communication•2017

  • Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion

    Vincent Price, Joseph N Cappella et al.•Political Communication•2002

  • The “Who” Matters

    Alyssa C Morey, W P Eveland et al.•Political Communication•2012

  • Social Networks and the Affective Impact of Political Disagreement

    Open Access•Bryan M Parsons•Political Behavior•2010

  • A Turn Toward Avoidance? Selective Exposure to Online Political Information, 2004–2008

    Open Access•R Kelly Garrett, Dustin Carnahan et al.•Political Behavior•2013

  • Media Use and Political Predispositions

    Open Access•Natalie Jomini Stroud•Political Behavior•2008

  • (Almost) Everything in Moderation

    Open Access•Allison M Gue, Andrew M Gue et al.•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • Civic Engagements

    Open Access•Michael Mackuen, Jennifer Wolak et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Why Do Partisan Media Polarize Viewers

    Open Access•Matthew S Levendusky, Matthew Levendusky•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation

    Diana C Mutz•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • The Hostile Audience

    Open Access•Yphtach Lelkes, Gaurav Sood et al.•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments

    Open Access•Allison M Gue, Andrew Gue et al.•British Journal of Political…•2020

  • Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks

    Sharad Goel, Winter Mason et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2010

  • The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States

    Sharad Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • Affect, Not Ideology

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Cross-cutting Social Networks

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•American Political Science Review•2002

  • The Myth of Partisan Selective Exposure

    Open Access•Jacob L Nelson, James G Webster•Social Media + Society•2017

  • Implications of Pro- and Counterattitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization

    Open Access•R Kelly Garrett, Shira Dvir Gvirsman et al.•Human Communication Research•2014

  • Social Identity, Selective Exposure, and Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Magdalena Wojcieszak, R Kelly Garrett•Human Communication Research•2018

Unique citing works22
Citations per year7,33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 22

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae