Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

European regional policy making

A challenge for our collective intelligence

Bibliographic Data

ID12666170
AuthorsKatharina Fellnhofer (0000-0002-8421-1547, Centre for Social Innovation, corresponding author), Margarita Angelidou (0000-0001-6623-9741, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
Year2024
Volume162
Pages103898-103898
Publication date2024-09-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Science & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1462-9011 • E-ISSN: 1873-6416
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103898
OpenAlexW4402698456
LanguageEN
References cited28

Smart specialization has emerged as a vital strategy for driving responsible research and innovation across Europe. Despite its growing importance, the integration of web-based platforms to support decision-making in policy contexts remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by examining how such platforms can enhance stakeholder engagement and decision-making processes in regional innovation policies. Using structural equation modeling and survey data from 686 respondents across four European countries (United Kingdom/Scotland, Greece, the Netherlands and Spain), we uncover that the presence of both experienced and novice stakeholders does facilitate innovation policy effectiveness. Our findings reveal that stakeholders who find web-based applications valuable for smart specialization tend to have a more favorable view of the decision-making processes and express higher satisfaction with the consensus achieved. This research highlights that web-based platforms can effectively support stakeholder engagement regardless of policy expertise levels, offering significant benefits for regional policymaking. Based on our research, integrating web-based applications into smart specialization strategies will enhance decision-making, support diverse stakeholders and improve overall policy effectiveness. • "Smart specialization drives responsible innovation strategies. • "Web-based tools enhance consensus in policy-making. • "Diverse stakeholders benefit from web apps. • "Inexperienced stakeholders contribute to innovation policy. • "Empowering engagement for better policy outcomes

Business · Economic policy · Geography · Policy making · Political science · Regional Policy · Regional science · Business Strategy and Innovation · Regional Development and Policy · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models

  • Global Patterns in Students’ Views of Science and Interest in Science

    Open Access•Ralf A L F van Griethuijsen, Michiel W van Eijck et al.•Research in Science Education•2015

  • Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities

    Open Access•Jintong Tang, K Michele Kacmar et al.•Journal of Business Venturing•2012

  • Tensions in Stakeholder Theory

    Open Access•Ralph E Freeman, Ruth Anne Phillips et al.•Business & Society•2020

  • How Important are Job Attitudes? Meta-Analytic Comparisons of Integrative Behavioral Outcomes and Time Sequences

    David A Harrison, Daniel A Newman et al.•Academy of Management Journal•2006

  • How Applying Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Can Provide Sustainable Competitive Advantage

    Thomas M Jones, Jeffrey S Harrison et al.•Academy of Management Review•2018

  • Estimation of Composite Reliability for Congeneric Measures

    Open Access•Tenko Raykov•Applied Psychological Measurement•1997

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • Common method biases in behavioral research

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Open Access•Claes Fornell, David F Larcker•Journal of Marketing Research•1981

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • Testing Structural Equation Models

    J Scott Long, Kenneth A Bollen•Testing Structural Equation Models•2012

  • The Sociology of Economic Life

    Mark Granovetter, Richard Swedberg•Sociology of Economic Life•2018

  • Intention—Behavior Relations

    Paschal Sheeran•European Review of Social…•2002

  • E-GovQual

    Open Access•Xenia Papadomichelaki, Gregoris Mentzas•Government Information Quarterly•2011

  • Smart systems of innovation for smart places

    Open Access•Anastasia Panori, Christina Kakderi et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

    Open Access•Lee J Cronbach•Psychometrika•1951

  • Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models

    Stanley A Mulaik, Larry R James et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1989

  • Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Lynn J Frewer•Science Technology & Human Values•2004

  • A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Lynn J Frewer•Science Technology & Human Values•2005

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae