Th’oppressor’s wrong,” or, what’s Hamlet to the Borderlands

Bibliographic Data

ID12722643
AuthorsKathryn Vomero Santos (0000-0002-9812-8859, Trinity University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume22
Issue2
Pages353-375
Publication date2024-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLatino Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1476-3435 • E-ISSN: 1476-3443
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1057/s41276-024-00462-6
OpenAlexW4402601903
LanguageEN
References cited26

This article offers a critical analysis of two poetic appropriations of Hamlet’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy: “El Hamlet Fronterizo” by Guillermo Gómez-Peña and “To be a Pocha or not to be” by Iris De Anda. Both poets use the languages, geographies, and ontological concerns of the US–Mexico Borderlands to reimagine the Danish prince’s famously introspective speech as a performance text that reflects their lived experiences and consciousnesses as border subjects. For Gómez-Peña and De Anda, the figure of Hamlet becomes a means through which to reject Western colonial worldviews, to refuse assimilation, and to center Borderlands ways of knowing, being, and doing. When Hamlet’s soliloquy is reimagined in these ways, the most urgent question is not whether or not to be but rather what it means to be someone whose existence is made vulnerable precisely because it exceeds the increasingly policed boundaries of nation, language, race, and gender

Art · Epistemology · HAMLET (protein complex · Literature · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics · Sociology · Cultural Studies · Law · Philosophy · South Asian Cinema and Culture

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access