The Impact of Restrictive Legislation on Gender-Affirming Care Providers in the United States
A National Survey
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12801568 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aynsley Scheffert (0000-0002-8470-8932, University of Iowa, corresponding author), Veronica L Timbers (0000-0002-3394-9402, Utah State University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-02 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sexuality Research and Social Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1553-6610 • E-ISSN: 1868-9884 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s13178-025-01177-6 |
| OpenAlex | W4414756801 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 45 |
Introduction The wave of legislative restrictions on gender-affirming care for youth in the United States has placed considerable strain on healthcare providers, intensifying emotional labor and increasing risks of occupational distress. This study explored professional quality of life among gender-affirming care providers, with a focus on differences based on state-level legislative restrictions and clinician identity. Methods This cross-sectional survey study collected data from a national sample of healthcare providers ( N = 142) April–August 2024 using validated measures, including the Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL), the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6), and the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS). Results Results indicated most providers reported mild levels of burnout and secondary traumatic stress, and those working in states with legislative restrictions experienced significantly higher levels of compassion satisfaction. Providers who self-identified as trans or gender-expansive (TGE) reported greater secondary traumatic stress and symptoms of distress compared to their cisgender peers. Conclusions The findings underscore the need for healthcare organizations to proactively support clinicians by offering targeted interventions and fostering inclusive environments that mitigate the broader sociopolitical pressures. Policy Implications Healthcare systems must implement structural supports that promote clinician well-being, particularly for TGE providers, in the face of hostile policy environments. At the policy level, there is a pressing need for legislation that safeguards access to gender-affirming care and protects the rights and safety of both patients and providers. Policymakers should consider the unintended workforce consequences of restrictive laws, including increased provider distress and potential threats to retention in already strained healthcare systems
Burnout · Compassion fatigue · Coping (psychology · Distress · Health care · Legislation · Legislature · Psychological intervention · Workforce · Healthcare innovation and challenges · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, work life conditions, and burnout among frontline mental health care professionals.
Burnout in Mental Health Services
A meta-analysis of the relationship between job burnout and secondary traumatic stress among workers with indirect exposure to trauma.
Estimating the Attributable Cost of Physician Burnout in the United States
The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale
Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress
“Death threats and despair”
Building an Academic Transgender Medicine Center of Excellence
LGBTQ+ identity concealment and disclosure within the (heteronormative) health professions
‘Stigma R us’
The Relationships between Stress, Burnout, Mental Health and Well-Being in Social Workers
Predicting Turnover
Conservation of resources
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |