Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The bittersweet rhetoric of controversiality in nineteenth- and twentieth-century French and English medical literature

Bibliographic Data

ID12821789
AuthorsFRANÇOISE SALAGER‐MEYER (University of the Andes, corresponding author), Nahirana Zambrano (University of the Andes)
Year2001
Volume2
Issue1
Pages141-174
Publication date2001-02-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Historical Pragmatics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1566-5852 • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/jhp.2.1.07sal
OpenAlexW2078128565
LanguageEN
Citations received7

This paper investigates the evolution of the linguistic means used by scientists to convey academic conflict in French and English medical discourse. The 185-year span studied (1810–1995) was divided into nine 20-year periods. The rhetorical strategies expressing academic conflicts were recorded in 180 papers and classified as direct or indirect. The results were analyzed using χ 2 tests. Between 1810 and 1929, no cross-linguistic difference was found in the frequency of either direct or indirect academic conflict. Between 1930 and 1995 direct academic conflict was more frequent in medical French than in medical English ( p = .013), and indirect academic conflict more common in medical English than in medical French ( p = .0001). Qualitatively speaking, nineteenth-century medical French and medical English academic conflicts were personal, polemical and provocative. Regarding twentieth-century academic conflict, medical French conflicts tend to remain personal and categorical whereas medical English academic dispute is characterized by its politeness and/or the shifting of conflict responsibility onto some inanimate entity. Our study indicates that the intellectual climate in a given scientific discursive community influences the rhetoric of conflict

Art · Linguistics · Literature · Politeness · Political science · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Classics · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · History · Law · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · linguistics and terminology studies · Philosophy

  • Register, Genre, and Style

    Open Access•Douglas Biber, Susan Conrad•Register, Genre, and Style•2009

  • Register, Genre, and Style

    Open Access•Douglas Biber, Susan Conrad•Register, Genre, and Style•2019

  • Some linguistic features of the physical sciences research article before, during and after the First World War

    Open Access•David Banks•Language, Context and Text. The…•2022

  • Contrastive Pragmatics in a Diachronic Perspective

    Open Access•Irma Taavitsainen, Matylda Włodarczyk•Contrastive Pragmatics•2021

  • Comentarios críticos escritos por estudiantes de Medicina sobre la evaluación del paciente

    Open Access•David Sánchez-Jiménez•Círculo de lingüística aplicada a…•2023

  • Academic criticism in Spanish medical discourse

    Open Access•FRANÇOISE SALAGER‐MEYER, Marı́a Ángeles Alcaraz Ariza et al.•International Journal of Applied…•2003

  • Genres, styles and discourse communities in global communicative competition

    Open Access•Fethi Helal•Discourse Studies•2014

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0.3
Citation span2003 - 2023 (21)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae