International Relations Theory and East Asian History
An Overview
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12847377 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David C Kang (0000-0002-5685-3841, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 181-205 |
| Publication date | 2013-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of East Asian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1598-2408 • E-ISSN: 2234-6643 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1598240800003908 |
| OpenAlex | W2321633124 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 73 |
Long understudied by mainstream international relations (IR) scholars, the East Asian historical experience provides an enormous wealth of patterns and findings, which promise to enrich our IR theoretical literature largely derived from and knowledgeable about the Western experience. The intellectual contributions of this emerging scholarship have the potential to influence some of the most central questions in international relations: the nature of the state, the formation of state preferences, and the interplay between material and ideational factors. Researching historical East Asia provides an opportunity to seek out genuine comparisons of international systems and their foundational components. This introduction surveys the field and sets out to frame debate and the intellectual terms of inquiry to assess progress and guide future research. Theoretically, the essays in this issue provide insights on the emerging literature on hierarchy in international relations, and move beyond simplistic assertions that power “matters” to explore the interplay of material and ideational causal factors. Methodologically, scholars are no longer treating all East Asian history as simply one case, while also becoming more careful to avoid selection bias by avoiding choosing selective evidence from the rich historical record. Collectively, the empirical cases discussed in this volume span centuries of history, include a wide variety of political actors across East Asia, and represent an exciting wave of new scholarship
China · East Asia · Economics · Epistemology · International relations · International relations theory · Mainstream · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Scholarship · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science · Variety (cybernetics · Asian Studies and History · Chinese history and philosophy · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
The International Relations of East Asia
Chosŏn’s Office of Interpreters
US Dominance and American Bias in International Relations Scholarship
Rethinking Hierarchies in East Asian Historical IR
Interpreting the Maritime and Overland Trade Regulations of 1882 between Chosŏn and the Qing
Is strategic studies narrow? Critical security and the misunderstood scope of strategy
How empires emerge
Elusive East Asia
The legacy of Admiral von Tirpitz
Measuring War in Early Modern East Asia, 1368–1841
Trade and Political Fragmentation on the Silk Roads
Why was there no religious war in premodern East Asia
East Asia International Relations and International Relations Theory
China Among Unequals
Revolutions in Sovereignty
In the Shadow of Power
Rationalism v. Constructivism
Bounding Power
The Sovereign State and Its Competitors
Honor, Symbols, and War
Social Theory of International Politics
Cultural Realism
The Origins of Alliances
Non-Western International Relations Theory
North Korea and the Northern Limit Line
The axial age
Balance of Power
The Axial Age
Lost Modernities
China Marches West
On Global Order
War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe
Sovereignty
Beyond the Bronze Pillars
Hegemonic order, September 11, and the consequences of the Bush revolution
The New Sovereignty in International Relations1
The Comedy of Errors? A Reply to Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni
Liberalism and empire
How al-Qaida Ends
Is Anybody Still a Realist
The Emerging Structure of International Politics
Mercantile Realism and Japanese Foreign Policy
Historical Reality vs. Neo-Realist Theory
Unanswered Threats
Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy
Escape from the State of Nature
Hard Times for Soft Balancing
The Stability of a Unipolar World
The Unipolar Illusion Revisited
The Unipolar Illusion
History vs. Neo-realism
Getting Asia Wrong
Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia
Bandwagoning for Profit
East Asia Before the West
Toward a Dynamic Theory of International Politics
The Tragedy of Great Power Politics
Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War
The Balance of Power in the Balance
How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get
Territoriality and beyond
Goliath's Curse
Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics
Socialization and hegemonic power
On Global Order
Domestic Politics, Foreign Policy, and Theories of International Relations
Bargainingtheory Andinternationalconflict
What (If Anything) Does East Asia Tell Us About International Relations Theory
Hierarchy and Legitimacy in International Systems
A ‘Confucian Long Peace’ in pre-Western East Asia
Testing Balance-of-Power Theory in World History
Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy
Power in International Politics
How Hierarchical Can International Society Be
The Middle Empire, a Distant Empire, an Empire Without Neighbors
Evaluating Theories
The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,08 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |