Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Scientific accompaniment

A new model for integrating program development, evidence and evaluation

Bibliographic Data

ID12896887
AuthorsPatricia Lannen (0000-0003-3239-2275, University Children's Hospital Zurich, corresponding author), Lisa Jones (0000-0001-5136-5614), Lisa A Jones (0000-0002-5122-8334, University of New Hampshire)
Year2022
Volume17
Issue4
Pages237-250
Publication date2022-08-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Children s Services (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1746-6660 • E-ISSN: 2042-8677
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/jcs-09-2021-0037
OpenAlexW4291237228
LanguageEN
References cited61

Purpose Calls for the development and dissemination of evidence-based programs to support children and families have been increasing for decades, but progress has been slow. This paper aims to argue that a singular focus on evaluation has limited the ways in which science and research is incorporated into program development, and advocate instead for the use of a new concept, “scientific accompaniment,” to expand and guide program development and testing. Design/methodology/approach A heuristic is provided to guide research–practice teams in assessing the program’s developmental stage and level of evidence. Findings In an idealized pathway, scientific accompaniment begins early in program development, with ongoing input from both practitioners and researchers, resulting in programs that are both effective and scalable. The heuristic also provides guidance for how to “catch up” on evidence when program development and science utilization are out of sync. Originality/value While implementation models provide ideas on improving the use of evidence-based practices, social service programs suffer from a significant lack of research and evaluation. Evaluation resources are typically not used by social service program developers and collaboration with researchers happens late in program development, if at all. There are few resources or models that encourage and guide the use of science and evaluation across program development

Business · Heuristic · Knowledge management · Management science · Originality · Political science · Process management · Program Design Language · Program evaluation · Scope (computer science · Service (business · Software engineering · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science · Psychology · Marketing

  • Research Methods in Education

    Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion et al.•Research Methods in Education•2002

  • Public Health Policy for Preventing Violence

    James A Mercy, Mark L Rosenberg et al.•Health Affairs•1993

  • Diffusion Theory and Knowledge Dissemination, Utilization, and Integration in Public Health

    Lawrence W Green, Judith M Ottoson et al.•Annual Review of Public Health•2009

  • Psychological Treatments That Cause Harm

    Open Access•Scott O Lilienfeld•Perspectives on Psychological…•2007

  • How Can We Increase Translation of Research into Practice? Types of Evidence Needed

    Russell E Glasgow, Karen M Emmons•Annual Review of Public Health•2007

  • Evaluation designs for adequacy, plausibility and probability of public health programme performance and impact

    Jean‐pierre Habicht•International Journal of…•1999

  • The rate of return to the HighScope Perry Preschool Program

    Open Access•James J Heckman, Seong Hyeok Moon et al.•Journal of Public Economics•2010

  • Republished research: Implementation research: what it is and how to do it

    David H Peters, Thomas Adam et al.•British Journal of Sports Medicine•2014

  • A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity

    Open Access•Christopher Carroll, Malcolm Patterson et al.•Implementation Science•2007

  • Academic motivation, self‐concept, engagement, and performance in high school

    Open Access•Joan Pegueroles, Jasmine Green et al.•Journal of Adolescence•2012

  • Bridging Research and Practice

    Open Access•Rachel G Tabak, Rachel Tabak et al.•American Journal of Preventive…•2012

  • Theory of Change

    Open Access•Mary J De Silva, Erica Breuer et al.•Trials•2014

  • “Scaling-out” evidence-based interventions to new populations or new health care delivery systems

    Open Access•Gregory A Aarons, Marisa Sklar et al.•Implementation Science•2017

  • Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs

    Open Access•Brian R Flay•Preventive Medicine•1986

  • Effectiveness of the Incredible Years parent training to modify disruptive and prosocial child behavior

    Open Access•Ankie Menting, Ankie T A Menting et al.•Clinical Psychology Review•2013

  • Combining parenting and economic strengthening programmes to reduce violence against children

    Open Access•J M Lachman, Joyce Wamoyi et al.•BMJ Global Health•2020

  • A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research

    Open Access•Justin Jagosh, Paula Louise Bush et al.•BMC Public Health•2015

  • Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research

    Open Access•Bruno Marchal, Van Belle et al.•Evaluation•2012

  • Emergent Learning

    Open Access•Marilyn Darling, Heidi Guber et al.•The Foundation Review•2016

  • Values Engagement in Evaluation

    Open Access•Jori N Hall, Jeehae Ahn et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2011

  • Core Implementation Components

    Open Access•Dean L Fixsen, Karen A Blasé et al.•Research on Social Work Practice•2009

  • The nurse–family partnership

    Open Access•David L Olds•Infant Mental Health Journal•2006

  • Advances in Bridging Research and Practice

    Open Access•Paul Flaspohler, Catherine A Lesesne et al.•American Journal of Community…•2012

  • Community Science

    Open Access•Abraham Wandersman•American Journal of Community…•2003

  • The Quality Implementation Framework

    Open Access•Duncan C Meyers, Joseph A Durlak et al.•American Journal of Community…•2012

  • Learning from Communities

    Open Access•Robin Lin Miller, Marybeth Shinn•American Journal of Community…•2005

  • Ready, Willing, and Able

    Open Access•Paul Flaspohler, Paul D Flaspohler et al.•American Journal of Community…•2012

  • Bridging the Gap Between Prevention Research and Practice

    Open Access•Abraham Wandersman, Jennifer Duffy et al.•American Journal of Community…•2008

  • The Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation

    Open Access•David Chambers, David A Chambers•American Journal of Community…•2012

  • Program maturity and cost analysis in the evaluation of primary prevention programs

    Open Access•Frank Baker, David V Perkins•Journal of Community Psychology•1984

  • Alternatives to the Randomized Controlled Trial

    Stephen G West, Naihua Duan et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2008

  • Why Don’t We See More Translation of Health Promotion Research to Practice? Rethinking the Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition

    Russell E Glasgow, Edward Lichtenstein et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2003

  • Bullying in school

    Dan Olweus, Susan P Limber•American Journal of Orthopsychiatry•2010

  • Community interventions and effective prevention

    Abraham Wandersman, Paul Florin•American Psychologist•2003

  • When to Intervene

    Open Access•Flavio Francisco Marsiglia, Kuli et al.•Prevention Science•2010

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae