Understanding Influences, Misinformation, and Fact-Checking Concerning Climate-Change Journalism in Pakistan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12909018 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Waqas Ejaz (0000-0002-2492-4115, National University of Sciences and Technology, corresponding author), Muhammad Ittefaq (0000-0001-5334-7567, University of Kansas), Muhammad Arif (0000-0003-0298-2135, National University of Sciences and Technology) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 404-424 |
| Publication date | 2021-08-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journalism Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1751-2786 • E-ISSN: 1751-2794 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17512786.2021.1972029 |
| OpenAlex | W3197259933 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 50 |
Scholars agree on the role of media and communication in mitigating climate change. However, the complex and scientific nature of climate change, particularly within a contemporary media setting that includes growing misinformation, has challenged environmental journalists. To better understand these challenges the present study uses the hierarchy of influences model to explore different levels of influence that shape climate content in an under-researched country, Pakistan. Additionally, this study explains reporters’ experiences in dealing with misinformation on climate change, its ability to impact their work, and their perception of using fact-checking tools to counter it. The results, based on 21 interviews with self-identified climate journalists, revealed that, on an individual level, lack of expertise and education influence their coverage of environmental issues. Furthermore, the reporters expressed that following the Western process and model of environmental journalism impacts their routine and climate coverage. Moreover, the journalists claimed that advertisers and corporations significantly influence their news stories on environmental issues. The study also reveals that the journalists believed that there is no widespread climate misinformation in Pakistan, thus reducing the need for fact-checkers. The paper concludes by discussing the findings while providing recommendations for enhanced journalism coverage of climate change in Pakistan
Citizen journalism · Climate change · Journalism · Misinformation · News media · Perception · Political science · Public relations · Technical Journalism · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Ecology
Contemporary Contested Ethiopian Media Practice and Its Influence on Journalists’ Autonomy and Role
Breaking the stigma
Fact-checking y desinformación climática en España. Tendencias en la cobertura, tematización y gestión de fuentes en la estrategia profesional de EFE Verifica, Maldito Clima y Newtral
How health journalists gatecheck public figures who share misinformation
Beyond the haze
Advocacy journalism and climate justice in a Global Southern country
Analysis of climate change disinformation across types, agents and media platforms
Media reporting of climate change crisis in Pakistan
Increasing Challenges and Shrinking Roles of Environmental Journalists in Nepal
Practicing Regional Climate Journalism
How does misinformation influence the digital agri-food advisory service? Multi-stakeholder Perspectives from Sri Lanka
Finger on the Pulse of Lifestyle Coverage
Resisting the Silence
Climate Change Communication in the Post-Normal Era
Social media, media freedom and misinformation
Science Journalism in Pakistan
The process of frame-building regarding climate change in Indonesia
The Global South and Climate Coverage
Media Portrayal of a Civil Rights Movement
Covering Feminicidios
Ethnic Newspaper Industry in Pakistan and Impacts of Corporate Ownership
Covering Environment and Climate Change in Turkey
The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication
Mediating the Message in the 21st Century
Anatomy of a Fact Check: Objective Practice and the Contested Epistemology of Fact Checking
Dividing climate change
Fact-checking platforms in Spanish. Features, organisation and method
Trust and the Media
Climate Change Reporting in Great Lakes Region Newspapers
Media Representations of Climate Change
Fake news practices in Indonesian newsrooms during and after the Palu earthquake
Science reporting in Accra, Ghana
Science journalism for development in the Global South
Framing and sources
Climate Change Denial
Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods
Who Speaks for the Climate
Climate Change in the Hindu Kush Himalayas
Consensus on consensus
The growth of climate change misinformation in US philanthropy
Journalistic Fact-Checking of Information in Pandemic
Online misinformation about climate change
Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem
Suffering in Silence
Principles and Boundaries of Fact-checking
The two-way flow of news
Checking PolitiFact’s Fact-Checks
How do we know we have global environmental problems? Science and the globalization of environmental discourse
Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union
Press Clubs, the Journalistic Field and the Practice of Journalism in Pakistan
A Media Sociology for the Networked Public Sphere
The science journalist online
News organizations, ideology, and work routines
Constructing Climate Change in the Americas
Converged journalism
Climate Change Skepticism and Denial
Leading Voices in the Denier Choir
A Practical Iterative Framework for Qualitative Data Analysis
Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |