Enthusiasm and Alienation
How Implementing Automated Journalism Affects the Work Meaningfulness of Three Newsroom Groups
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12909327 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gunhild Ring Olsen (0000-0002-0847-5823, Høyskolen Kristiania, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 304-320 |
| Publication date | 2023-03-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journalism Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1751-2786 • E-ISSN: 1751-2794 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17512786.2023.2190149 |
| OpenAlex | W4327732346 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 36 |
Automated journalism is currently being implemented in newsrooms all over the world. This ethnographic case study of two Norwegian newsrooms explores how different newsroom groups relate to the innovation. Finding that editors and developers tend to applaud the possibilities of machine-written news while reporters are more critical, this study applies the concept of work meaningfulness to better understand the divergent reactions. The results show that key aspects making work meaningful—such as skill variety, self-development, autonomy, and sense of purpose—are influenced in severely different ways among the groups. As the investment in automated journalism has led to fewer editorial resources, reporters have experienced less room for in-depth reporting, few opportunities for extending skills, and little self-government. They also state that classical journalistic knowledge is no longer celebrated, while technical competence is perceived as essential. In contrast, the work meaningfulness of most editors and developers has increased. The paper concludes that all three newsroom groups hold a strong secular calling toward their work. It is therefore crucial that editors and media leaders acknowledge different groups’ work-related beliefs and purposes when implementing new technology. If not, the result can be a dramatic loss of work meaningfulness
Alienation · Autonomy · Citizen journalism · Competence (human resources · Enthusiasm · Journalism · Media studies · Norwegian · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Technical Journalism · Variety (cybernetics · Work (physics · Computer Science · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Psychology · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Social Psychology · Team Dynamics and Performance
Artificial intelligence as a game-changer or passing tech fad in journalism? A qualitative study on journalists’ perceptions and technology adoption in a Global South country
Digitalization and Meaning in Journalistic Work (MJoW)
Dancing with AI
Three Identity Groups
Artisan, Advocate, Steward
Revisiting the Algorithms Behind the Headlines. How Journalists Respond to Professional Competition of Generative AI
Make Slot not Art
Beyond the Calling
One Size Fits Some
A Little of that Human Touch
Mapping the Human–Machine Divide in Journalism
Comparing Media Systems
The Future of the Professions
On the meaning of work
Case Study Research
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Robots in the Workplace
Conditional Autonomy
The Algorithms Behind the Headlines
The Aftertaste you Cannot Erase. Career Histories, Emotions and Emotional Management in Local Newsrooms
Applying critical realism in qualitative research
Using thematic analysis in psychology
The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits
The Robotic Reporter
The Sage Handbook of Digital Journalism
Trading zones, boundary objects, and the pursuit of news innovation
Changes in Professionalism of U.S. Journalists in the Turbulent Twenty-First Century
Atomising the News
A Welfare State of Mind
HiPPOs (Highest Paid Person’s Opinion) in the Swedish Media Industry on Innovation
Who are these Guys
Pioneer journalism
Post-industrial fog
Sociological Work
Precarious Passion or Passionate Precariousness? Narratives from co-research in Journalism and Editing
Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |