Les Organisations Hybrides
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12969330 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chantal Hervieux (0000-0002-0339-6982, corresponding author), Jean‐Mathieu Fallu (HEC Montréal, corresponding author), Marie‐france Turcotte (Université du Québec à Montréal, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2016-06-13 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian journal of nonprofit and social economy research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1920-9355 • E-ISSN: 1920-9355 |
| Publisher | University of Alberta Libraries (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.22230/cjnser.2016v7n1a203 |
| OpenAlex | W2469522731 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 25 |
In this article, we study hybrid organizations, namely those practicing social entrepreneurship and those practicing durable entrepreneurship. These organizations do not choose between the contradictory requirements fostered by the objectives that they pursue, be they double objectives (social and economic) or triple (social, economic and environmental). Rather, they choose to accept the tensions inherent in the pursuit of contradictory objectives. This study is based on a cluster analysis of 244 small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It identifies and distinguishes between three main types of organization, commercial SMEs, social entrepreneurship SMEs and sustainable SMEs. These types of SMEs, even though they resemble each other in their structural characteristics (size, age, revenue), differ in terms of the actualization of their entrepreneurial and market orientations. Dans cet article, nous étudions les organisations hybrides, c’est-à-dire celles de l’entrepreneuriat social et de l’entrepreneuriat durable. Ces organisations, plutôt que de choisir entre les exigences contradictoires posées par les objectifs doubles (social et économique) ou triples (social, économique et environnemental) qu’elles s’efforcent d’atteindre, choisissent d’accepter les tensions créées par la poursuite d’objectifs contradictoires. L’étude permet, à partir d’une analyse de regroupement réalisée auprès de 244 PME, d’identifier et de distinguer trois principaux types d’organisation, soit les PME commerciales, les PME d’entreprenariat social et les PME d’entrepreneuriat durable. En outre, ces types de PME, dont les caractéristiques structurelles (taille, âge, revenus) ne sont pas différentes, diffèrent en ce qui concerne l’actualisation de l’orientation entrepreneuriale et de l’orientation envers le marché
Business · Business administration · Economics · Entrepreneurship · Humanities · Political science · Revenue · Social entrepreneurship · Welfare economics · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Innovation and Knowledge Management · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development · Finance
Toward a Theory of Paradox
Toward a Theory of Paradox
Market Orientation
Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship
Social entrepreneurship research
Classifying Managerial Responses to Multiple Organizational Identities
A typology of social entrepreneurs
Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation
Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research
Market Orientation
Corporate Environmentalism
The Legitimacy of Social Entrepreneurship
Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance
Social entrepreneurship
Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship
A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior
Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research
Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts
Entrepreneuriat Social et Participation Citoyenne
The Structure of Social Capital
The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector
Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |