Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Innovation science

Between models and machines

Bibliographic Data

ID12973502
AuthorsJoakim Juhl (Harvard University Press, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume8
Issue2
Pages116-139
Publication date2016-05-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEngineering Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1937-8629 • E-ISSN: 1940-8374
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/19378629.2016.1205593
OpenAlexW2496049646
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited20

Academic scientists are increasingly required to acquire industry funding, which affects the scope and purpose of their research. In Denmark, Mode 2 inflected ideas have turned universities' research toward industrial application where the fabrication of 'robust knowledge' is tied to commercial innovation. By analyzing the representative modeling of theoretical physicists that aided the implementation of new control solutions, this paper investigates how Mode 2 challenged traditional disciplinary boundaries between engineering and physics. The paper thus presents a case of non-engineers' move toward 'engineering' from outside the disciplinary boundary of engineering. The physicists' preference for theoretical rigor resulted in models that despite not being validated with production data were useful to the factory. Questions are raised about the challenges that the physicists' normative baggage entailed when they engaged in commercial application. The case signifies how Mode 2 inspired neoliberal science policy constitutes a new competitive market for the application of science and illuminate how theoretical physics was translated into a service for commercial innovation. In the process, physics, the identities of the physicists, the factory and its process control converged around shared success criteria and thus formed a new domain of work that I conceptualize as innovation science. The case demonstrates some of the demarcation challenges associated with the political reframing of science and the work it takes for science and non-science to develop beneficiary relationships, which translate into new challenges and potential applications for engineering

Cognitive reframing · Discipline · Engineering ethics · Engineering management · Factory (object-oriented programming · Process (computing · Scope (computer science · Social science · Sociology · Work (physics · Computer Science · Engineering · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · International Science and Diplomacy · Research, Science, and Academia · Mechanical Engineering

  • Challenging the “deficit model” of innovation

    Open Access•Sebastian Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M Pfotenhauer et al.•Research Policy•2019

  • Managing academics vis-a-vis the university’s third mission

    Ricardo A Ayala, Karol W Leja et al.•Higher Education Research &…•2026

  • Making and breaking the manual – a case of tests and rapport in an interdisciplinary team

    Open Access•Helene Ilkjær, Mette My Madsen•Journal of Organizational…•2020

  • America by Design

    David Franklin Noble•America by Design•1979

  • The new production of knowledge

    Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny et al.•The new production of knowledge•1994

  • The sociology of science

    Robert King Merton•The sociology of science•1973

  • How the Laws of Physics Lie

    Nancy Cartwright•How the laws of physics lie•1983

  • Designs on Nature

    Sheila Jasanoff•Designs on Nature•2005

  • Science

    Vannevar Bush•Transactions of the Kansas…•1945

  • Boundaries of Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•Handbook of Science and…•1995

  • Institutions for Simulations

    Open Access•Ann Johnson•Science & Technology Studies•2006

  • Making Lists, Enlisting Scientists

    Open Access•C B Jensen•Science & Technology Studies•2011

  • Do Artifacts Have Politics

    Langdon Winner•Computer Ethics•2017

  • Dreamscapes of Modernity

    Sheila Jasanoff, Sang-Hyun Kim•Dreamscapes of Modernity•2015

  • The Republic of Science

    Open Access•Michael Polanyi•Minerva•2000

  • Containing the Atom

    Open Access•Sheila Jasanoff, Sang-Hyun Kim•Minerva•2009

  • Pandora's hope

    Bruno Latour•Pandora's hope•1999

  • Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Sanctioning Models

    Open Access•Eric Winsberg•Science in Context•1999

  • Models, Simulations, and Their Objects

    Open Access•Sergio Sismondo•Science in Context•1999

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,43
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae