Mixed-reality simulations to build capacity for advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion in the geosciences
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12975773 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jason A Chen (0000-0002-3768-6339, University of Wisconsin–Madison, corresponding author), M Shane Tutwiler (0000-0002-6135-0579, University of Wisconsin–Madison), Jerlando F L Jackson (0000-0001-9915-5771, University of Wisconsin–Madison) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 557-568 |
| Publication date | 2020-05-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Diversity in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1938-8934 • E-ISSN: 1938-8926 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/dhe0000190 |
| OpenAlex | W3020856412 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 22 |
We report on data collected at 3 time points during a 1-year intervention designed to teach a purposive sample of geoscience faculty members (n = 29) from 27 universities throughout the United States howto identify and address issues related to diversity, equity, and inclusion in their departments. For the intervention we used mixed-reality simulations to help participants practice specific skills to address common situations in geoscience departments. The intervention also included an intensive 3-dayworkshop and 3 journal clubs. Using a Bayesian analytical approach we explored: (a) general trends in participants’ self- and collective efficacy for identifying and addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion over a 1-year period; (b) relationships between self-efficacy and collective efficacy; and (c) demographic factors that explain variation in self- and collective efficacy. Results showed that self- and collective efficacy rose sharply from preintervention to 5 months after beginning. Although both self- and collective efficacy retreated toward baseline at the 1-year mark, only 1-year self-efficacy was still credibly higher than preintervention. Also, preintervention self-efficacy predicted 5-month collective efficacy. Efficacy beliefs varied as a function of race/ethnicity. Only collective efficacy varied as a function of academic rank. We discuss these findings in relation to social–cognitive theory and the literature regarding the use of digital learning environments to address diversity, equity, and inclusion
Diversity (politics · Equity (law · Inclusion (mineral · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Anthropology · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Career Development and Diversity · Gender Studies · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Law · Psychology
Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy
Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning
Beyond Power Calculations
Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and Waic
Reconceptualizing the Sources of Teaching Self-Efficacy
A Gentle Introduction to Bayesian Analysis
Self-Efficacy
The Effect of an Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Habit for Faculty at One Institution
The Racial and Ethnic Microaggressions Scale (Rems)
Diversity in political science
Testing the effectiveness of an online diversity course for faculty and staff
Promoting institutional change through bias literacy
Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching
Maybe I can teach those kids.” The influence of contextual factors on student teachers’ efficacy beliefs
Attitudes and Advocacy
Breaking the prejudice habit
Long-term reduction in implicit race bias
A Course on Effective Teacher-Child Interactions
Social Cognitive Theory
Does Diversity Pay
Carrying the Burden of Transformation
Why Doesn't Diversity Training Work? The Challenge for Industry and Academia
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |