Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Justifiable narratives

The rise and fall of family politicians in South Korea

Bibliographic Data

ID13021173
AuthorsJung Hoon Park (0000-0002-5897-4428, Sogang University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume8
Issue3
Pages689-707
Publication date2023-01-18
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Journal of Comparative Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2057-8911 • E-ISSN: 2057-892X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/20578911221129653
OpenAlexW4317254396
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited36

Like other Asian democracies, family politics is not unknown to South Korea. The triumph of Park Geun–hye, daughter of former authoritarian ruler Park Chung–hee, in the 2012 presidential election was in particular interpreted as a precursor of ‘dynastization’ in Korean politics. Nevertheless, up to the present day, political families in South Korea have been significantly less successful in securing offices through electoral competition than their Asian counterparts. Using extensive evidence from statistical and documentary sources, I argue the following: First, South Korean family politicians are more likely to face unfavorable popular sentiment towards their candidacies in elections than family politicians in other Asian democracies. Second, in addition to inheriting their predecessors' political advantages, they are required to enhance their own electoral appeal by properly justifying that their electoral participation is compatible with popular demands for meritocracy and procedural fairness. This argument highlighting politico–cultural requirements, or what I call justifiable narratives, for dynastic succession is empirically supported by case studies of four South Korean family politicians

Argument (complex analysis · Authoritarianism · Democracy · Face (sociological concept · Narrative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Ruler · Social science · Sociology · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Socioeconomic Development in Asia

  • Retracted

    Open Access•Menghan Zhang, Qi Xue et al.•SAGE Open•2024

  • Political dynasties in the age of democracy

    Open Access•Ade Irfan Abdurahman, Evie Ariadne Shinta Dewi et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2025

  • Null

    Open Access•null null•Philosophy study•2016

  • Political Parties

    R Michels, Seymour Martin Lipset et al.•Political Parties•2017

  • Political Dynasties

    Ernesto Dal Bó, Pedro Dal Bó et al.•The Review of Economic Studies•2009

  • House of clans

    Julio C Teehankee•Routledge Handbook of the…•2018

  • Democratic dynasties

    Rashmi Singh•Commonwealth and Comparative…•2018

  • Political Dynasties in Thailand

    Stithorn Thananithichot, Wichuda Satidporn•Asian Studies Review•2016

  • Understanding family politics

    Open Access•Jemma Purdey, Edward Aspinall et al.•South East Asia Research•2016

  • Towards Confucian democratic meritocracy

    Open Access•Kyung Rok Kwon•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2020

  • Becoming a Candidate

    Open Access•Samuel H Fisher•Political Science Quarterly•2013

  • America's Political Dynasties

    Vincent P De Santis, Stephen Hess•The Journal of Southern History•1967

  • Political dynasties in the Philippines

    Open Access•Jemma Purdey, Teresa S Encarnacion Tadem et al.•South East Asia Research•2016

  • Inequality in democracy

    Ronald U Mendoza, Edsel L Beja et al.•Philippine Political Science…•2012

  • A Century of Contention in South Korea

    Dylan Stent•Asian Survey•2019

  • Legacy Candidates in Taiwan Elections, 2001–2016

    Nathan F Batto•Asian Survey•2018

  • Dynastic Politics

    Stratos Patrikio, Stratos Patrikios et al.•South European Society & Politics•2015

  • President Park Geun-Hye of South Korea

    Young-Im Lee, Farida Jalalzai•Politics & Gender•2017

  • Political Dynasties and Particularistic Campaigns

    Open Access•Taishi Muraoka•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Economic Evaluations, Procedural Fairness, and Satisfaction with Democracy

    Open Access•Pedro C Magalhães•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research

    Open Access•Jason Seawright, John Gerring•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • The Perils of Presidentialism

    Open Access•Juan J Linz•Journal of democracy•1990

  • South Korea's Democratic Decay

    Open Access•Gi-Wook Shin, Gi‐wook Shin•Journal of democracy•2020

  • Dynastic Politicians

    Open Access•Yasushi Asako, Taku Iida et al.•Japanese Journal of Political…•2015

  • Democratic regression in Asia

    Aurel Croissant, J Haynes•Democratization•2021

  • The Philippine presidency in Southeast Asian perspective

    Mark R Thompson•Contemporary Politics•2017

  • Bureaucracy and Growth

    Open Access•Peter Evans, James E Rauch•American Sociological Review•1999

  • Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics

    Open Access•Giovanni Sartori•American Political Science Review•1970

  • How Meritocracy is Defined Today

    Open Access•Chang-Hee Kim, Chang H Kim et al.•Economics & Sociology•2017

  • Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

    Open Access•Bent Flyvbjerg•Qualitative Inquiry•2006

Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae