Assessing the Impact of Political Involvement on the Reliability and Validity of Virtualized Real-time-response Measurement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13036659 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tobias Waldvogel (0000-0002-0268-2135, University of Freiburg, corresponding author), Thomas Metz (0000-0001-6049-3968, University of Freiburg), Uwe Wagschal (0000-0002-6694-232X, University of Freiburg), Bernd Becker (0000-0003-4031-3258, University of Freiburg), Linus Feiten (University of Freiburg), Samuel Weishaupt (University of Freiburg) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 53-86 |
| Publication date | 2021-05-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Statistics Politics and Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2151-7509 • E-ISSN: 2194-6299 |
| Publisher | De Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/spp-2020-0014 |
| OpenAlex | W3162304732 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 31 |
How does political involvement impact on data quality of virtualized Real-Time-Response (RTR) Measurement? The article addresses this issue, drawing on a large field study (n = 5660) conducted during the 2017 German general election campaign. Since it is unclear how heterogeneous characteristics of individuals influence data quality of RTR-Measurement from audiences surveyed outside the lab, we assess the impact of political involvement on the reliability and validity of virtualized real-time-response data. We show that political involvement shapes reliability and validity systematically but to a degree that does not compromise established standards of data quality. Thus, we conclude that virtualized RTR outside the laboratory with limited means of control is an appropriate method to survey heterogeneous samples in large N-field studies and therefore offers new paths of data collection
Compromise · Data collection · Data quality · Data science · Field (mathematics · Geography · German · Operations management · Political science · Politics · Quality (philosophy · Reliability (semiconductor · Reliability engineering · Statistics · Survey data collection · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Computer Science · Engineering · Law · Mathematics · Media Influence and Health · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology
Merkel gegen Steinbrück
Paul F. Lazarsfeld/Bernard Berelson/Hazel Gaudet, The People’s Choice. How the Voter Makes Up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign, New York/London 1944
Die Wirkung verbaler und nonverbaler Kommunikation in TV-Duellen
Unifying or Polarizing? Short-Term Effects and Postdebate Consequences of Different Rhetorical Strategies in Televised Debates
Schröder gegen Stoiber
Statistik für Politikwissenschaftler
Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation
Debating Europe
Reliability and Validity of Real-Time Response Measurement
Measuring Real-Time Response in Real-Life Settings
A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates
Presidential Debates, Partisan Motivations, and Political Interest
This time it’s different? Effects of the Eurovision Debate on young citizens and its consequence for EU democracy – evidence from a quasi-experiment in 24 countries
Sagen Bilder mehr als tausend Worte? Die Relevanz verbaler und visueller Informationen für die Urteilsbildung über Personen im Fernsehen
The Power of Television Images
Real-Time Reactions to a 2012 Presidential Debate
Breaking Out of the Lab
Dimensions of Political Involvement
Presidential Campaigns and the Knowledge Gap
Miniature Campaigns’ in Comparison
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.75 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |