The Cyberfare State
Divergent models of digital governance and control
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13137759 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Roland Kelemen (Széchenyi István University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2673-3145 • E-ISSN: 2673-3145 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpos.2026.1748562 |
| OpenAlex | W7127602163 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 125 |
The digital transformation of state functions has produced a profound paradox: technologies that enhance welfare provision simultaneously enable unprecedented surveillance and control. While optimistic accounts celebrate e-government and Digital-Era Governance for increasing efficiency and citizen engagement, critical scholarship warns of surveillance capitalism and digital authoritarianism. This article introduces the Cyberfare State as a new theoretical framework that transcends the utopia–dystopia binary, conceptualising digital governance as the dialectical unity of welfare and warfare functions in cyberspace. Drawing on historical welfare-state and warfare-state models, the analysis distinguishes two ideal-typical configurations: the smart total-control Cyberfare State, characteristic of authoritarian regimes, which fuses state and corporate power to maximise surveillance and offensive capability; and the cooperating Cyberfare State, viable only under rule-of-law constraints, which requires sustained, rights-compliant collaboration among state, private-sector, and individual actors. The cooperating model’s viability hinges on systemic cybersecurity education and the integration of citizens as active co-producers of national resilience, yet persistent educational deficits and reliance on sporadic awareness campaigns leave individuals as the weakest link. Failure to implement comprehensive reform risks irreversible societal harm and strategic disadvantage against authoritarian rivals. The Cyberfare State framework thus offers a roadmap for transatlantic democracies to navigate hybrid threats while preserving democratic values
Authoritarianism · Control (management · Corporate governance · Democracy · Hacker · Offensive · Scholarship · State (computer science · Welfare state · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Digital Era Governance
Revolutionizing healthcare
The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism
A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production
Why We Need a New Welfare State
Topological network and fuzzy AHP modeling framework for the suitability analysis of evacuation shelters
Digital sovereignty
Informality and Courts
Rescaling the legal dimensions of grey zones
Digitally-induced change in the public sector
The Political Philosophy of Data and AI
Government in the digital age
Public Trust in Australia’s Law Enforcement Agencies and Collecting National Security Intelligence Data
Censorship from Plato to Social Media
The European Union general data protection regulation
Enhancing community preparedness
Messaging strategies of Ukraine and Russia on Telegram during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
Cybersecurity Regulations and Software Resilience
From Voice to Action
The better angels of our digital nature? Offensive cyber capabilities and state violence
Surveillance capitalism and the surveillance state
The absorbent digital welfare state
Street-level morality at the digital frontlines
Citizen engagement in co-creation of e-government services
Voices in Hostile Sources
Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government
Advancing E-governance for development
A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on the Impacts of e‐Government
Digital and spatial knowledge management in urban governance
Transnational governance of cybersecurity
On the asymmetric advantages of cyberwarfare. Western literature and the Chinese journal Guofang Keji
Cyber campaigns and strategic outcomes
Technological capacity in the public sector
Theater of state
The Warfare State
Cyber Warfare & Inadvertent Escalation
The European Union's Regulatory Power
Blurring Boundaries
Digital Authoritarianism and the Future of Human Rights
How Authoritarianism Transforms
Determinants of digital finance in India
Data science, artificial intelligence and the third wave of digital era governance
Implementing digitalization in the public sector. Technologies, agency, and governance
Digital identity as platform-mediated surveillance
Between surveillance and recognition
How platforms govern
Digital health for all
E-government and moral citizenship
Introduction to the digital welfare state
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |