Comparison of Conservation Training Procedures
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13657136 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David R Anderson (0000-0002-1128-6206, Duke Medical Center, corresponding author), Alice T Clark (University of North Dakota) |
| Year | 1978 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 495-499 |
| Publication date | 1978-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.1978.43.2.495 |
| OpenAlex | W2023735347 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 7 |
Direct comparisons were made among four different conservation training procedures, reversibility training, compensation training, addidition/subtraction training and a verbal reinforcement method in order to determine which might best facilitate conservation acquisition in previously nonconserving first grade students. The data indicated that verbal methods stressing principles of reversibility and addition/subtraction resulted in the acquisition of concepts of conservation statistically comparable to that of a group of natural conservers
Arithmetic · Compensation (psychology · Geography · Reinforcement · Subtraction · Training (meteorology · Animal and Plant Science Education · Art Education and Development · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.04 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1979 - 2005 (27) |
| Highly cited | No |