Physiological inequalities do not result in psychological inequalities in vision field
Evidence from a test of visual selective attention
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13916635 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xufeng Liu (0000-0001-9492-966X, corresponding author), Jing Lü (0000-0001-5766-2775), Jingjing Gong (0009-0007-4072-3982), Jing-jing Gong, Shengjun Wu (0000-0001-5144-2050), Sheng-Jun Wu, Wei Wang (0000-0001-5806-2368) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 405-414 |
| Publication date | 2010-03-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0301-2212 • E-ISSN: 1179-6391 |
| Publisher | Scientific Journal Publishers Limited (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2224/sbp.2010.38.3.405 |
| OpenAlex | W2018727950 |
| Language | EN |
It is well known that there are some characteristics of physiological inequality among vision fields. But, based on many studies, this inequality does not lead to psychological inequalities. Our aim was to assess directly the effect of vision field (foveal, parafoveal, peripheral) on irrelevant distractors' rejection of selective attention and to determine whether or not the physiological inequalities of different vision fields bring out psychological inequalities. Results showed that there were significant differences in reaction time and error rate among 3 vision fields, but no distractor effect. Results demonstrated that perception processing efficiency was not balanced among the 3 types of vision, but does have a similar function of distractor rejection
Cognitive psychology · Computer vision · Field (mathematics · Foveal · Function (biology · Inequality · Perception · Peripheral vision · Test (biology · Visual field · Computer Science · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neuroscience · Ocular and Laser Science Research · Psychology · Visual perception and processing mechanisms
| Highly cited | No |
|---|