Restoring Balance
A Consensus Statement on the Protection of Vulnerable Research Participants
Bibliographic Data
A diverse panel convened in June 2011 to explore a dilemma in human research: some traits may make individuals or communities particularly vulnerable to a variety of harms in research; however, well-intended efforts to protect these vulnerable individuals and communities from harm may actually generate a series of new harms. We have presented a consensus statement forged by the panel through discussion during a 2-day meeting and the article-writing process. We have identified practical problems that sometimes arise in connection with providing additional safeguards for groups labeled as vulnerable and offered recommendations on how we might better balance concerns for protection with concerns for justice and participant autonomy
Autonomy · Balance (ability) · Dilemma · Economic Justice · Harm · Political science · Public relations · Statement (logic) · Variety (cybernetics) · Ethics in Clinical Research · Ethics in medical practice · Health Policy Implementation Science · Law · Medicine · Psychology
The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics
Ethical Research in Business Ethics
Intersections of Women as Survivors
Key Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Motivators for Research Participation Among Individuals Who Are Incarcerated
Australian Mental Health Consumer and Carer Perspectives on Ethics in Adult Mental Health Research
Recognizing Risk and Vulnerability in Research Ethics
Teaching Vulnerability in Research
Lived experiences of participation in mental health research in Canada
Whose story is it? Mental health consumer and carer views on carer participation in research
A New Brief Instrument for Assessing Decisional Capacity for Clinical Research
Bad blood
The ethics of reimbursing injecting drug users for public health research interviews
Informed Consent Documents
Therapeutic Misconception" and "Recruiting Doublespeak" in the Informed Consent Process
IRB Member Judgments of Decisional Capacity, Coercion, and Risk in Medical and Psychiatric Studies
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,82 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2023 (9) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |