Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bridging or Breaking? A Systematic Review of How Generative AI Shapes Equity in Foreign Language Education

Bibliographic Data

ID14817740
AuthorsNgo Cong‐Lem (0009-0005-3299-477X, Faculty of Foreign Languages Dalat University Lamdong Province Vietnam), Chau Ngoc Van Bui (0009-0009-5164-4790, Faculty of Foreign Languages Dalat University Lamdong Province Vietnam), Nguyen Phan Nhat Nguyen (0000-0002-2016-5481, Faculty of Foreign Languages Dalat University Lamdong Province Vietnam), Minh Quang Huynh (0000-0002-4258-1697, Faculty of Education Dalat University Lamdong Province Vietnam)
Year2025
Publication date2025-11-21
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Applied Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0802-6106 • E-ISSN: 1473-4192
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ijal.70052
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited41

This systematic review examines how generative AI (GenAI) technologies, such as ChatGPT, shape equity in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education. Drawing on 22 peer‐reviewed empirical studies published between January 2023 and June 2025, selected from an initial pool of 430 records across five major databases (Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, ProQuest, and Google Scholar), the review synthesizes emerging evidence on GenAI's dual impact. Findings reveal that GenAI can bridge equity gaps by expanding access, providing personalized scaffolding, supporting multilingual and inclusive learning, and promoting teacher innovation, yet it can also widen disparities through infrastructural inequities, digital literacy divides, algorithmic bias, and English‐dominant linguistic norms. To address these tensions, the review introduces the Equity‐Positioned Implementation of AI (EPI‐AI) Framework, which conceptualizes equitable GenAI integration as systemic, relational, and contextually contingent across five interrelated domains: access and infrastructure, AI literacy, pedagogy, governance, and sociocultural responsiveness. By consolidating empirical insights through an educational justice lens, this review repositions GenAI research in EFL from tool‐focused innovation toward an evidence‐based and equity‐oriented understanding of how technology mediates inclusion, participation, and opportunity

  • Using DeepSeek’s reasoning-based AI model to support written feedback practices

    Open Access•Chenze Wu, Wentao Li et al.•Assessing Writing•2026

  • Artificial Intelligence for Academic Writing and Speaking in Higher Education

    Open Access•Abdullah Alazemi, Abdullah Alenezi et al.•Education Sciences•2026

  • GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers

    Open Access•Weixin Liang, Mert Yuksekgonul et al.•Patterns•2023

  • EFL students’ perceptions about the role of generative artificial intelligence (GAI)-mediated instruction in their emotional engagement and goal orientation

    Open Access•Ali Derakhshan•Learning and Motivation•2025

  • Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning

    Open Access•Locky Law•Computers and Education Open•2024

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • From Redistribution to Recognition?

    Nancy Fraser•New Social Theory Reader•2020

  • What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature

    Open Access•Chung Kwan Lo•Education Sciences•2023

  • A year of generative AI in English language teaching and learning - A case study

    Gökhan Hınız•Journal of Research on Technology…•2026

  • Empowering international PhD students

    Open Access•Lynette Pretorius, Huy-Hoang Huynh et al.•The Internet and Higher Education•2025

  • Investigating L2 writers' critical AI literacy in AI-assisted writing

    Open Access•Chaoran Wang, Zhaozhe Wang•Journal of Second Language Writing•2025

  • Ethical use of generative AI for writing practices

    Open Access•Anh Dang, Anh Kim Dang et al.•Journal of Second Language Writing•2024

  • Translanguaging with generative AI in EFL writing

    Open Access•Wanli Yang, Chenming Lin et al.•Journal of Second Language Writing•2025

  • The synergy of generative AI and inquiry-based learning

    Hui-Chin Yeh, Hui‐Chin Yeh•Interactive Learning Environments•2025

  • Generative AI (GenAI) in the language classroom

    Open Access•Seongyong Lee, Hohsung Choe et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • Adaptive Teaching for Autistic Graduate Students in Indonesia

    Naufal Rangkuti, Sri Setyarini•Changing English•2026

  • Personalizing AI tools for second language speaking

    Open Access•Yiran Du, Chenghao Wang et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2025

  • Exploring dual language teachers’ experiences, perceptions and pedagogical implications of ChatGPT in emergent bilingual education

    Open Access•Magdalena Pando, Maricela León et al.•Bilingual Research Journal•2025

  • The educational affordances and challenges of generative AI in Global Englishes-oriented materials development and implementation

    Open Access•Alfred W T Lo•System•2025

  • AI-generated storytelling for socially just EFL pedagogy

    Open Access•Akram Ramezanzadeh, Saman Ebadi•System•2024

  • The impact of different conversational generative AI chatbots on EFL learners

    Open Access•Chenghao Wang, B Zou et al.•System•2024

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae